Bug#738981: Fwd: Bug#738981: Switch to use generic_fpu for ARM

2014-03-02 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Sat, 01 Mar 2014 01:00:02 +0900
schrieb Taihei Momma t...@mac.com: 

 OK, after some investigation with armhf cross environment and qemu, finally 
 the current mpg123 svn (r3517) should work 

After Tahei didn't stop at this (big thanks from here!), we got a new
snapshot,

http://mpg123.org/snapshot/mpg123-20140302115523.tar.bz2 ,

that will hopefully become mpg123 1.19.0 soon (not 1.18.x
because of feature additions regarding this very debian issue). The
main points:

- float output with all decoders (also arm_nofpu)
- ARM decoders (esp. NEON) working with debian toolchain
- new --with-cpu=arm_fpu choice with runtime detection to switch
  between NEON or normal FPU

So, the number of builds for optimal treatment of differing platforms
reduces to two:

1. --with-cpu=arm_nofpu
2. --with-cpu=arm_fpu

I hope we can all be happy about that. I'd also be glad to get some
confirmation from debian that it really works now. Release will be
imminent, then.

Thanks for staying with us with all the chattering about this ...


Alrighty then,

Thomas



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#740496: Please change build dependency from slv2-dev to lv2-dev + lv2core

2014-03-02 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Package: traverso
Version: 0.49.2

Hello,

Please change build dependency from slv2-dev to lv2-dev + lv2core.
slv2-dev is deprecated and is be replaced by lv2-dev.

slv2 will be removed  from archive in future.

best regards

mira___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#740122: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-03-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libplotmm-dbg |0.1.2-2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
libplotmm-dbg | 0.1.2-2+b1 | hurd-i386
libplotmm-dev |0.1.2-2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
libplotmm-dev | 0.1.2-2+b1 | hurd-i386
libplotmm-doc |0.1.2-2 | all
libplotmm0 |0.1.2-2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
libplotmm0 | 0.1.2-2+b1 | hurd-i386
plotmm |0.1.2-2 | source
plotmm-examples |0.1.2-2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
plotmm-examples | 0.1.2-2+b1 | hurd-i386

--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete, dead upstream, unused
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 740...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/740122

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#740123: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-03-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

 jack-rack | 1.4.8~rc1-2 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc

--- Reason ---
ROM; dead upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 740...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/740123

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#740123: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-03-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 1.4.8~rc1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package jack-rack has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/740123

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#732670: marked as done (segfault on loading of setting files)

2014-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:45:41 +
with message-id e1wk6i5-0003ha...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#740123: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #732670,
regarding segfault on loading of setting files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
732670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: jack-rack
Version: 1.4.8~rc1-2
Severity: important

1. Set some filters in jack-rack
2. save
3. load
4. [segfault]

Attached is an example file that segfaults.

[39022.436412] jack-rack[9415]: segfault at 0 ip   (null) sp
7fffa607eb38 error 14 in jack-rack[40+19000]

[48599.653336] jack-rack[9513]: segfault at 10081 ip
7ffd45d15542 sp 7fffe3e0b130 error 4 in
libjack.so.0.1.0[7ffd45d02000+55000]

I start jack server via jack_control, if that matters.

- Adam


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages jack-rack depends on:
ii  jackd 5
ii  libasound21.0.27.2-3
ii  libatk1.0-0   2.10.0-2
ii  libc6 2.17-97
ii  libcairo2 1.12.16-2
ii  libfontconfig12.11.0-2
ii  libfreetype6  2.5.1-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.28.2-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.36.4-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.24.22-1
ii  libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116]  1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
ii  liblrdf0  0.4.0-5
ii  libpango-1.0-01.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0   1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0 1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libxml2   2.9.1+dfsg1-3
ii  python2.7.5-5

Versions of packages jack-rack recommends:
ii  blop 0.2.8-6
ii  cmt  1.16-1
ii  swh-plugins  0.4.15+1-7

jack-rack suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


rack_settings
Description: application/gzip
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 1.4.8~rc1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package jack-rack has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/740123

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#734020: marked as done (FTBFS: error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’)

2014-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:45:41 +
with message-id e1wk6i5-0003ha...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#740123: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #734020,
regarding FTBFS: error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
734020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: jack-rack
Version: 1.4.8~rc1-2
Severity: serious


adamm@mira:/tmp$ apt-get source jack-rack
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
NOTICE: 'jack-rack' packaging is maintained in the 'Git' version control system 
at:
git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/jack-rack.git
Need to get 140 kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ sid/main jack-rack 1.4.8~rc1-2 (dsc) 
[2,144 B]
Get:2 http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ sid/main jack-rack 1.4.8~rc1-2 (tar) 
[122 kB]
Get:3 http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ sid/main jack-rack 1.4.8~rc1-2 (diff) 
[15.9 kB]
Fetched 140 kB in 0s (7,200 kB/s)
dpkg-source: info: extracting jack-rack in jack-rack-1.4.8~rc1
dpkg-source: info: unpacking jack-rack_1.4.8~rc1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking jack-rack_1.4.8~rc1-2.debian.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying 01-desktop_file.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying 02-gcc45_binutils_gold.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying 03-remove_midi_when_replacing_plugin.patch


$ debuild

In file included from
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/libgnomeui.h:35:0,
 from ui_callbacks.c:34:
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/gnome-app-helper.h:620:2:
error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
  GtkCallbackMarshal relay_func;
  ^
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/gnome-app-helper.h:687:9:
error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
 GtkCallbackMarshal relay_func, gpointer data,
 ^
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/gnome-app-helper.h:725:11:
error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
   GtkCallbackMarshal relay_func, gpointer data,
   ^
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/gnome-app-helper.h:771:9:
error: unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
 GtkCallbackMarshal relay_func, gpointer data,
 ^
In file included from
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/libgnomeui.h:62:0,
 from ui_callbacks.c:34:
/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0/libgnomeui/gnome-client.h:457:13: error:
unknown type name ‘GtkCallbackMarshal’
 GtkCallbackMarshal function,
 ^

Full log is attached. This *could* a problem with libgnomeui when
using GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED . See 

/usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtktypeutils.h

The symbol in question is on line 50. It probably would be re-enabled
if GTK_COMPILATION was defined, but I don't know what that means (I'm
not a Gnome person).

- Adam



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages jack-rack depends on:
ii  jackd 5
ii  libasound21.0.27.2-3
ii  libatk1.0-0   2.10.0-2
ii  libc6 2.17-97
ii  libcairo2 1.12.16-2
ii  libfontconfig12.11.0-2
ii  libfreetype6  2.5.1-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.28.2-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.36.4-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.24.22-1
ii  libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.116]  1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
ii  liblrdf0  0.4.0-5
ii  libpango-1.0-01.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0   1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0 1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libxml2   2.9.1+dfsg1-3
ii  python2.7.5-5

Versions of packages jack-rack recommends:
ii  blop 0.2.8-6
ii  cmt  1.16-1
ii  swh-plugins  0.4.15+1-7

jack-rack suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package jack-rack
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.4.8~rc1-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
 dpkg-source --before-build 

Bug#738981: Fwd: Bug#738981: Switch to use generic_fpu for ARM

2014-03-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Thomas Orgis thomas-fo...@orgis.org wrote:
 Am Sat, 01 Mar 2014 01:00:02 +0900
 schrieb Taihei Momma t...@mac.com:

 OK, after some investigation with armhf cross environment and qemu, finally 
 the current mpg123 svn (r3517) should work

 After Tahei didn't stop at this (big thanks from here!), we got a new
 snapshot,

 http://mpg123.org/snapshot/mpg123-20140302115523.tar.bz2 ,

 that will hopefully become mpg123 1.19.0 soon (not 1.18.x
 because of feature additions regarding this very debian issue). The
 main points:

 - float output with all decoders (also arm_nofpu)
 - ARM decoders (esp. NEON) working with debian toolchain
 - new --with-cpu=arm_fpu choice with runtime detection to switch
   between NEON or normal FPU

 So, the number of builds for optimal treatment of differing platforms
 reduces to two:

 1. --with-cpu=arm_nofpu
 2. --with-cpu=arm_fpu

 I hope we can all be happy about that. I'd also be glad to get some
 confirmation from debian that it really works now. Release will be
 imminent, then.

That sounds like if the mpg123 package should use:

on armel: --with-cpu=arm_nofpu
on armhf: --with-cpu=arm_fpu


Does this make sense to everybody?

 Thanks for staying with us with all the chattering about this ...

Thank you for handling this issue (and basically every issue other
that popped out in Debian for mpg123) so quickly!


-- 
regards,
Reinhard

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


brp-pacu 2.1.1+git20111020-4 MIGRATED to testing

2014-03-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the brp-pacu source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.1.1+git20111020-3
  Current version:  2.1.1+git20111020-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


dvdwizard 0.7.1-2 MIGRATED to testing

2014-03-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the dvdwizard source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: (not in testing)
  Current version:  0.7.1-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


mididings 0~20120419~ds0-4 MIGRATED to testing

2014-03-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the mididings source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: (not in testing)
  Current version:  0~20120419~ds0-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


silan 0.3.2-2 MIGRATED to testing

2014-03-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the silan source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.3.2-1
  Current version:  0.3.2-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#738811: handbrake: crashes after source DVD is selected - request to change severity

2014-03-02 Thread tony mancill
Does this bug have to be severity grave and thus RC?  This implies that
the package isn't usable at all, and that it should removed from testing
(and will be, on March 14th).  Yet I had no problems using the current
version to rip several DVDs.

Would the submitter consider a severity of 'important' instead, so the
package won't be automatically removed?

  important - a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a
  package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone [1]

Thank you,
tony

[1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers