Processing of bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

2017-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.dsc
  bs1770gain_0.4.12.orig.tar.gz
  bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
  bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports->backports-policy

2017-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:53:34 +0200
Source: bs1770gain
Binary: bs1770gain
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.12-2~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team 

Changed-By: Wouter Verhelst 
Description:
 bs1770gain - measure and adjust audio and video sound loudness
Changes:
 bs1770gain (0.4.12-2~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
 .
   * Reupload to backports
Checksums-Sha1:
 0ab6204ac3200dc13e4675e41ed28325ebf11433 2101 bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 31fd42d0f8add14fbd1858d26c8c1ea687354a5c 182968 bs1770gain_0.4.12.orig.tar.gz
 9c4cf97369908702e2f9f3bbd0a1f8b58045c8e6 519048 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 47ca0dccf11d5b843b943f1f9bca88ff978e37ff 43096 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 1943903f41957a76b23d4a11b3236067845f67ca3f767a48c5c3a717e0310625 2101 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 cafc5440cf4940939c675e98c8dbeb839f4965d60f74270a37d4ee70559b3a59 182968 
bs1770gain_0.4.12.orig.tar.gz
 6a9710bc26b974fac9420b6107b0adb14076726f2e413dafd25ed773dbaf4493 519048 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 249a86abe2d0df9049e52a49f3aac650813d40cf62be02e94185484116714c5a 43096 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Files:
 658a6755e77d4b1c535c584a40e82b7c 2101 sound optional 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.dsc
 8a3bed994e5b511054e493871509d5a5 182968 sound optional 
bs1770gain_0.4.12.orig.tar.gz
 dc4b4101c4258bf13bf82d832e627b32 519048 sound optional 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
 c251f568aa5a55027f05ec15c9bf5999 43096 sound optional 
bs1770gain_0.4.12-2~bpo8+1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=AdiF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-10 Thread Peter Hanappe



Hello all,

I agree that the licenses in fluidsynth are not completely consisted and
Debian is right to make sure that they are.
However, it seems that chorus.c is now under the LGPL license. From
https://sourceforge.net/p/sox/code/ci/master/tree/COPYING:

  SoX source code is distributed under two main licenses. The two
  licenses are in the files LICENSE.GPL and LICENSE.LGPL. sox.c,
  and thus SoX-the user application, is distributed under the
  GPL, while the files that make up libsox are licensed under the
  less restrictive LGPL.

In the Makefile.am, you can see that chorus.c is part of libsox
(https://sourceforge.net/p/sox/code/ci/master/tree/src/Makefile.am).

I don't check the list of contributors to
fluidsynth_chorus.c. There was Markus Nentwig and me but surely
others, too. However, since fluidsynth was under LGPL
with "Copyright (C) 2003 Peter Hanappe and others" from the
beginning, I don't believe any contributors to
fluidsynth_chorus.c would object to putting their changes to that
file under the LGPL. I'll happily make my changes available under
that license.

So, because SoX/chorus.c is now under the LGPL and all the
changes that have been made between chorus.c and
fluidsynth_chorus.c fall under the LGPL, I believe that
fluidsynth_chorus.c can be put under the LGPL, too.

Cheers,
Peter



On 04/10/2017 12:38 PM, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:

El dl 10 de 04 de 2017 a les 09:24 +0200, David Henningsson va escriure:

What makes things slightly easier for us as upstream is that FluidSynth
is released under LGPL rather than GPL. LGPL allows linking to custom
licenses.

This is not the case because fluid_chorus.c is part of the library and
must respect rights under LGPL.

Rewriting fluid_chorus.c could be one first step. However, we could wait
some time until Chris Bagwell tells us about the original source; Chris
Bagwell or Peter Hanappe, it is not clear to me that fluid_chorus.c
comes from SoX.


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


[bts-link] source package inkscape

2017-04-10 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package inkscape
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #858617 (http://bugs.debian.org/858617)
# Bug title: Fails to load certain JPEG files
#  * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679442
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> Triaged
usertags 858617 + status-Triaged

thanks

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-10 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dl 10 de 04 de 2017 a les 09:24 +0200, David Henningsson va escriure:
> What makes things slightly easier for us as upstream is that FluidSynth 
> is released under LGPL rather than GPL. LGPL allows linking to custom 
> licenses.

This is not the case because fluid_chorus.c is part of the library and
must respect rights under LGPL.

Rewriting fluid_chorus.c could be one first step. However, we could wait
some time until Chris Bagwell tells us about the original source; Chris
Bagwell or Peter Hanappe, it is not clear to me that fluid_chorus.c
comes from SoX.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-10 Thread David Henningsson

Hi.

This came as a surprise for me. What's worse, it seems like none of the 
maintainers are currently active in Fluidsynth, and AFAIK none of us 
have time to either rewrite fluid_chorus.c, or track down all 
contributors to it since 1998.


What makes things slightly easier for us as upstream is that FluidSynth 
is released under LGPL rather than GPL. LGPL allows linking to custom 
licenses.


Thus, my suggestion for us as upstream is that we clearly document (in 
readme files etc) that we have one file that is not LGPL. That I can do.


Perhaps Debian has the time/manpower required to track down 
contributors? FWIW,


In the event that I should hold any copyright in fluid_chorus.c, I'm 
happy to allow these to be relicensed under GNU

LGPL 2.0+.

Regards,
  David Henningsson

On 2017-04-07 20:01, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:



2017-04-07 14:16 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo >:


Source: fluidsynth
Version: 1.1.6-4
Severity: wishlist

fluid_chorus.c is under a custom license, granting the following:

This source code is freely redistributable and may be used for
any purpose.


Hi fluidsynth devs,

we serious licensing issue in debian in fluid_chorus.c file.
Is there any chance to relicense this file with some GPL friendly license?
Full bug report here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859793

best regards

mira



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers