Bug#740708: libjack0:amd64 uninstallable with libjack0:i386

2014-05-16 Thread Adrian Knoth

On 05/07/14 17:01, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:


Hello,


Hi!


Since it seems to be caused only by the tiny version number difference
which was introduced by the binNMU, there should be a very simple fix
for it: artificially bump the version number to
1:0.124.1+20140122git5013bed0-3, changing nothing else, upload and let
the buildd do the job, producing binaries linked with db5.3 for all
architectures.

Can Debian Multimedia Maintainers do that, or should I (src)NMU it?


Will do in a second.


Cheers

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#740708: libjack0:amd64 uninstallable with libjack0:i386

2014-05-07 Thread Tanguy Ortolo

Hello,

This issue is pretty annoying for Debian testing, as it renders Wine 
uninstallable on amd64, as it depends on libjack0:i386, which is 
uninstallable together while keeping libjack0:amd64.


Since it seems to be caused only by the tiny version number difference 
which was introduced by the binNMU, there should be a very simple fix 
for it: artificially bump the version number to 
1:0.124.1+20140122git5013bed0-3, changing nothing else, upload and let 
the buildd do the job, producing binaries linked with db5.3 for all 
architectures.


Can Debian Multimedia Maintainers do that, or should I (src)NMU it?

--
 ,--.
: /` )   Tanguy Ortolo  xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu
| `-'Debian Developer   irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
 \_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers