Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Oh, I now see what happened with swh-plugins now with '+  * Fix
multi-arch path."' (I received email to deb-multimedia mailing list
and replied without checking bug context).  Sorry about that!  I'll
move my OT discussion to the mailing list.

Best regards,
Nicholas

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
It was not intended to install plugins to multi-arch dir.
This topic was discused already once without a clear result :(
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036278.html

mira

2016-06-01 2:58 GMT+02:00 Nicholas D Steeves :
> On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaromír Mikeš  wrote:
>> Will be fixed soon.
>>
>> mira
>>
>> 2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo :
>>> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure:
 +  * Fix multi-arch path.
>>>
>>> Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in
>>> favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA
>>> plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa.
>
> A few of my hopefully-baseless worries:
>
> Would someone please confirm that this is a mechanism in place to
> insure that any of /usr/lib/*/ladspa and /usr/lib/ladspa will be
> correctly added to $LADSPA_PATH?  Also, will the multiarch approach
> necessitate a LADSPA32_PATH LADSPA64_PATH in the case of a mixed i386
> and amd64 system?  Or is this the beginning of a formal transition
> from /usr/lib/ladspa to /usr/lib/$primary_arch/ladspa?
>
> Sincerely,
> Nicholas

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-05-31 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaromír Mikeš  wrote:
> Will be fixed soon.
>
> mira
>
> 2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo :
>> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure:
>>> +  * Fix multi-arch path.
>>
>> Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in
>> favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA
>> plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa.

A few of my hopefully-baseless worries:

Would someone please confirm that this is a mechanism in place to
insure that any of /usr/lib/*/ladspa and /usr/lib/ladspa will be
correctly added to $LADSPA_PATH?  Also, will the multiarch approach
necessitate a LADSPA32_PATH LADSPA64_PATH in the case of a mixed i386
and amd64 system?  Or is this the beginning of a formal transition
from /usr/lib/ladspa to /usr/lib/$primary_arch/ladspa?

Sincerely,
Nicholas

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-05-31 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Will be fixed soon.

mira

2016-05-31 20:42 GMT+02:00 Javier Serrano Polo :
> El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure:
>> +  * Fix multi-arch path.
>
> Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in
> favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA
> plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa.
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-05-31 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure:
> +  * Fix multi-arch path.

Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in
favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA
plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of /usr/lib/ladspa.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Processed: Bug#824211 marked as pending

2016-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 824211 pending
Bug #824211 [swh-plugins] swh-plugins: Package new upstream version
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
824211: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824211
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers