Re: [SCM] jack-audio-connection-kit/master: Build adding -fPIC to CFLAGS

[James Cowgill]

Hi Bálint,

On 28/09/16 22:13, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> It would be nice if this change could be uploaded in the not too distant
> future. I did not want to upload it now since the last upload was made
> just 2 days ago.
[...]
>> Build adding -fPIC to CFLAGS
>>
>> Closes: 837423

Am I right in thinking this commit is now obsolete and can be reverted?
That bug is already closed.

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [SCM] jack-audio-connection-kit/master: Build adding -fPIC to CFLAGS

[Jaromír Mikeš]

2016-09-28 23:13 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :

> It would be nice if this change could be uploaded in the not too distant
> future. I did not want to upload it now since the last upload was made
> just 2 days ago.

Hi,

if you are plan upload it. I think it would be great if watch file
would be be fixed to track github repository rather than old place.

https://github.com/jackaudio/jack1
http://jackaudio.org/download

Than we can see easily new releases ;)

best regards

mira

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: [SCM] jack-audio-connection-kit/master: Build adding -fPIC to CFLAGS

[Debian/GNU]

On 2016-09-28 23:13, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> I did not want to upload it now since the last upload was made
> just 2 days ago.

could you explain the reasoning behind this?

i agree that it would be better (as in: less ressources needed from
ftp-masters and snapshots.d.o,...) to collect all fixes before doing an
upload.
but since an upload withOUT a fix for #837423 has already been done,
what is the benefit of witholding the fix?

the only possible reason i see is that the unfixed version of
jack-audio-connection-kit might enter testing two days earlier.
given that this package is probably *mostly* used as a B-D (with the
runtime dependencies mostly being satisfied by jackd2) i don't think
that this is a big advantage.

fgmasdr
IOhannes

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers