Re: dvd-slideshow depends
Hi, >On 14-09-2016 07:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> Herbert Fortes wrote: >>> I did not understand. xorriso[0] Debian package is from >>> libisoburn source package. >> >> Sorry for causing confusion! >> >> I just remembered that GNU xorriso was not exactly the same as >> libisoburn's xorriso. We package the latter in Debian, but the link you >> provided in the context of missing UDF support pointed to the GNU xorriso >> page. >> >> Anyway, the only difference seems to be that GNU xorriso has all the >> libraries bundled togther and is statically linked, whereas libisoburn's >> xorriso requires all the other libburn libraries separately and is >> dynamically linked. Feature-wise, they seem to be identical. >> > > Thanks for the explanation. I really did not notice > that (two projects). > > I hope to have something to show tomorrow. Using > genisoimage and cdrskin will be easy to replace > mkisofs and dvdrecord commands, I guess. -mkisofs -dvd-video -udf -o dvd.iso "$dvd_dir" +genisoimage -dvd-video -udf -o dvd.iso "$dvd_dir" The line can the same, but only '-udf' option can create the UDF. I did a search and found a post[0] that says 'mkudffs' command should be used to garantee UDF. Can someone say something about that ? [0] - http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/17594/how-to-create-udf-images-and-burn-them-to-dvd-or-cdrom# -cdrecord -v driveropts=burnfree -eject -dao dev=ATAPI:0,0,0 $1 +cdrskin -v driveropts=burnfree -eject -dao dev=/dev/dvdrw I also would like an opinion about DAO. The cdrskin's manpage seems to recommend avoid it. Regards, Herbert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
On 14-09-2016 07:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Herbert Fortes wrote: >> I did not understand. xorriso[0] Debian package is from >> libisoburn source package. > > Sorry for causing confusion! > > I just remembered that GNU xorriso was not exactly the same as > libisoburn's xorriso. We package the latter in Debian, but the link you > provided in the context of missing UDF support pointed to the GNU xorriso > page. > > Anyway, the only difference seems to be that GNU xorriso has all the > libraries bundled togther and is statically linked, whereas libisoburn's > xorriso requires all the other libburn libraries separately and is > dynamically linked. Feature-wise, they seem to be identical. > Thanks for the explanation. I really did not notice that (two projects). I hope to have something to show tomorrow. Using genisoimage and cdrskin will be easy to replace mkisofs and dvdrecord commands, I guess. Regards, Herbert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
Herbert Fortes wrote: > I did not understand. xorriso[0] Debian package is from > libisoburn source package. Sorry for causing confusion! I just remembered that GNU xorriso was not exactly the same as libisoburn's xorriso. We package the latter in Debian, but the link you provided in the context of missing UDF support pointed to the GNU xorriso page. Anyway, the only difference seems to be that GNU xorriso has all the libraries bundled togther and is statically linked, whereas libisoburn's xorriso requires all the other libburn libraries separately and is dynamically linked. Feature-wise, they seem to be identical. Cheers, Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
On 12-09-2016 17:44, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Montag, den 12.09.2016, 15:41 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: >> So mkisofs will be replaced by genisoimage. I said xorrisofs >> before, but it seems that xorrisofs "does not produce UDF >> filesystems"[2]. Bad because xorriso project is more active >> (2016). genisoimage stopped in 2014. > > I am not sure if GNU xorriso has the same features as the program of > the same name from the libburn project? > I did not understand. xorriso[0] Debian package is from libisoburn source package. [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libisoburn.html Regards, Herbert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
Am Montag, den 12.09.2016, 15:41 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: > So mkisofs will be replaced by genisoimage. I said xorrisofs > before, but it seems that xorrisofs "does not produce UDF > filesystems"[2]. Bad because xorriso project is more active > (2016). genisoimage stopped in 2014. I am not sure if GNU xorriso has the same features as the program of the same name from the libburn project? - Fabian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
Hi, On 11-09-2016 15:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 09/11/2016 07:47 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> update >> - ./debian/patches/01_dvd-burn.patch > > why? what will this update achieve? > >> >> create a patch for: >> - ./dvd-menu >> - two files in ./doc (.html, .wiki) >> - ./man/dvd/-menu.1 > > why? what will this patch achieve? > Let me explain better. mkisofs is from cdrtools[0]. Not part of Debian since 2006 [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cdrtools.html dvdrecord from dvdrtools[1]. Not part of Debian since 2011 [1] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dvdrtools.html So mkisofs will be replaced by genisoimage. I said xorrisofs before, but it seems that xorrisofs "does not produce UDF filesystems"[2]. Bad because xorriso project is more active (2016). genisoimage stopped in 2014. dvdrecord, I checked just now, will be replaced by cdrskin, from the package with the same name. [2] - https://www.gnu.org/software/xorriso/ Regards, Herbert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
On 11-09-2016 15:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 09/11/2016 07:47 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> update >> - ./debian/patches/01_dvd-burn.patch > > why? what will this update achieve? Will replace cdrecord -> xorrecord > >> >> create a patch for: >> - ./dvd-menu >> - two files in ./doc (.html, .wiki) >> - ./man/dvd/-menu.1 > > why? what will this patch achieve? Will replace mkisofs -> xorrisofs I did not check the manpages about the options that xorriso tools use. mkisofs and cdrecord as used by the upstream: mkisofs -dvd-video -udf -o dvd.iso "$dvd_dir" cdrecord -v driveropts=burnfree -eject -dao dev=ATAPI:0,0,0 $1 > > On 09/11/2016 07:47 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> I have time and I will get closer to the team, > > great! > >> but this package >> is helpful in any way ? I mean, there is a more recent project >> replacing dvd-slideshow ? > > this is not *very* important. > as long as a package is not bitrotting away and/or binding too many > Debian ressources (DD/DM time; security team...), i see little value in > replacing a useful and working package with something else, just because > it is new and shiny. > Ok. Regards, Herbert ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: dvd-slideshow depends
On 09/11/2016 07:47 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > update > - ./debian/patches/01_dvd-burn.patch why? what will this update achieve? > > create a patch for: > - ./dvd-menu > - two files in ./doc (.html, .wiki) > - ./man/dvd/-menu.1 why? what will this patch achieve? On 09/11/2016 07:47 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I have time and I will get closer to the team, great! > but this package > is helpful in any way ? I mean, there is a more recent project > replacing dvd-slideshow ? this is not *very* important. as long as a package is not bitrotting away and/or binding too many Debian ressources (DD/DM time; security team...), i see little value in replacing a useful and working package with something else, just because it is new and shiny. gdmadsr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
