Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/ itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc Hey Felipe, It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has your name/email at the bottom: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 .hc We have nothing to fear from love and commitment. - New York Senator Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage bill ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc Hey Felipe, It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has your name/email at the bottom: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1 Yes, I know. It is not important, though. Next upload should have your name on it (or my name added to Uploaders, depending on how the thing goes). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is the easiest way to update the changelog. Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more delays I updated it myself. Uploaded. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can generate the appropriate tarball. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/ itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. .hc I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg- multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its officially called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is included in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/ itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html .hc 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2, by Mohja Kahf ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
requesting sponsorship for pd-ggee
pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other ITP'ed packages depend on it. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
