Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] [gphoto-devel] ANNOUNCE: libgphoto2/gphoto2 2.4.2 released!

2008-07-20 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:05:28AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/07/2008):
> > Hi folks!
> 
> Hello,
> 
> > It took longer than I actually expected, but here it is, the 2.4.2
> > branch release.
> 
> here's a quick update from the libgphoto2 Debian maintainers, targeted
> at both developers and users.
> 
> Since 2.4.2 got out just before the freeze, we didn't have a
> sufficiently wide window to got it tested in depth, so we'll stick to
> 2.4.1 for the next stable release. Since we know that ID updates (and
> other bugfixes/improvements) are quite frequent, we'll try to keep a
> version available through the backports.org site, so that stable users
> can easily have an updated libgphoto2 package.

Oh.
 
> If you have any question/suggestion/other regarding the Debian
> packaging, feel free to contact us at the following address:
> .

You should at least also take the initial startup speedup patch,
rev 11066.

Even on fast machines it saves over a second startup time.

Ciao, Marcus

Index: gphoto2-abilities-list.c
===
--- gphoto2-abilities-list.c(Revision 11065)
+++ gphoto2-abilities-list.c(Revision 11066)
@@ -576,28 +576,20 @@
return (list->count);
 }
 
+static int
+cmp_abilities (const void *a, const void *b) {
+   const CameraAbilities *ca = a;
+   const CameraAbilities *cb = b;
 
+   return strcasecmp (ca->model, cb->model);
+}
+
 static int
 gp_abilities_list_sort (CameraAbilitiesList *list)
 {
-   CameraAbilities t;
-   int x, y;
-
CHECK_NULL (list);
 
-   for (x = 0; x < list->count - 1; x++)
-   for (y = x + 1; y < list->count; y++)
-   if (strcasecmp (list->abilities[x].model,
-   list->abilities[y].model) > 0) {
-   memcpy (&t, &list->abilities[x],
-   sizeof (CameraAbilities));
-   memcpy (&list->abilities[x],
-   &list->abilities[y],
-   sizeof (CameraAbilities));
-   memcpy (&list->abilities[y], &t,
-   sizeof (CameraAbilities));
-   }
-
+   qsort (list->abilities, list->count, sizeof(CameraAbilities), 
cmp_abilities);
return (GP_OK);
 }
 

___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] [gphoto-devel] ANNOUNCE: libgphoto2/gphoto2 2.4.2 released!

2008-07-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/07/2008):
> Hi folks!

Hello,

> It took longer than I actually expected, but here it is, the 2.4.2
> branch release.

here's a quick update from the libgphoto2 Debian maintainers, targeted
at both developers and users.

Since 2.4.2 got out just before the freeze, we didn't have a
sufficiently wide window to got it tested in depth, so we'll stick to
2.4.1 for the next stable release. Since we know that ID updates (and
other bugfixes/improvements) are quite frequent, we'll try to keep a
version available through the backports.org site, so that stable users
can easily have an updated libgphoto2 package.

If you have any question/suggestion/other regarding the Debian
packaging, feel free to contact us at the following address:
.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency

2008-07-20 Thread Steve Cotton
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:18:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2008-07-20 Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, it looks like recommending enblend is still the right thing to do. I
> > did not verify that yet by actually stitching some pano, so I'm not
> > closing this bug.
> 
> Stitching does not work if the respective option is not checked, the
> dialogue is somehow messed up (BL Blended panorama, RI remapped
> images. x=option set)

So I think Hugin still needs to depend on Blender.


> According to the help RI should decide whether the intermediate images
> are kept, I do not know whether this works when BL is checked, since
> running enblend does not work, due to the bug.

It works (I'm using the patch attached to #491227).

Steve



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Thoughts about libgphoto2?

2008-07-20 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi,

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:18:13PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I think it's a package that would be a quite good
> candidate for backports.org, so that people can fetch it from there to
> get better and better camera support with each and every release.

Agreed.

> I plan to walk through its bug list next week anyway. Also, I think I'll
> wait until 2.4.1-1 is in testing before eventually uploading a -2 with
> would fix #491065. The change is quite minimal and might be granted a
> freeze exception if RT people consider it's needed for lenny.

Sounds good to me.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Thoughts about libgphoto2?

2008-07-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks,

libgphoto2 2.4.2 was released one week ago, and seems to fix some bugs,
and add support for more cameras. Since it's quite new, I'm not very
inclined to rush its upload, and I'd rather let 2.4.1 flow quietly to
testing in some days. I think it's a package that would be a quite good
candidate for backports.org, so that people can fetch it from there to
get better and better camera support with each and every release.

I plan to walk through its bug list next week anyway. Also, I think I'll
wait until 2.4.1-1 is in testing before eventually uploading a -2 with
would fix #491065. The change is quite minimal and might be granted a
freeze exception if RT people consider it's needed for lenny.

Thoughts?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-07-20 Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,

> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:03:02PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > previously enblend was optional, the hugin GUI offered optons to stitch
> > without it. Nowadays enblend is required. This is a limitation
> > of the GUI, nona could still stitch without enblend.

> I still see a checkbox named "Blended panorama" as part of the stitcher
> configuration. This option seems to activate or disable the use of
> enblend judging from how the GUI changes - if I disable the option, the
> drop-down menu which offers enblend disappears.

I somehow missed this, and was guided by "Note that enblend is no
longer optional with hugin-0.7.0" on
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/download/.

> So, it looks like recommending enblend is still the right thing to do. I
> did not verify that yet by actually stitching some pano, so I'm not
> closing this bug.

Stitching does not work if the respective option is not checked, the
dialogue is somehow messed up (BL Blended panorama, RI remapped
images. x=option set)

BL | RI
---+---
x  |  ?   Run nona first, producing multiple aligned tiffs, then run
   |  enblend on these.
---+
   |  x   Run nona, producing multiple aligned tiffs, but not a stitched
   |  image.
---+
   |  Do nothing. 
---+

According to the help RI should decide whether the intermediate images
are kept, I do not know whether this works when BL is checked, since
running enblend does not work, due to the bug.

cu andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491539: Bug#491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency

2008-07-20 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi,

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:03:02PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> previously enblend was optional, the hugin GUI offered optons to stitch
> without it. Nowadays enblend is required. This is a limitation
> of the GUI, nona could still stitch without enblend.

I still see a checkbox named "Blended panorama" as part of the stitcher
configuration. This option seems to activate or disable the use of
enblend judging from how the GUI changes - if I disable the option, the
drop-down menu which offers enblend disappears.

So, it looks like recommending enblend is still the right thing to do. I
did not verify that yet by actually stitching some pano, so I'm not
closing this bug.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently Debian has enblend 3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Steve Cotton
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> imho this should be severity serious, since hugin (GUI) always tries
> to run enblend.
> cu andreas

Thanks Andreas,

I was on the borderline of setting "serious" when I logged this
bug.  As the dependency on Enblend is only "recommends", I assumed
there was an alternative way to use Hugin.

Having seen your
  #491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency
I agree this is an RC bug.  But I'm not familiar with the Debian
priorities, so won't bump the severity myself.

Cheers,
Steve



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491227: reassign 491227 to hugin, found 491227 in 0.7.0~svn3191-1, forcibly merging 491227 491562

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
reassign 491227 hugin 
found 491227 0.7.0~svn3191-1
# GUI is part of hugin, not hugin-tools, reassign and merge there.
forcemerge 491227 491562




___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Processed: reassign 491227 to hugin, found 491227 in 0.7.0~svn3191-1, forcibly merging 491227 491562

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> reassign 491227 hugin
Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently 
Debian has enblend 3.0
Bug reassigned from package `hugin-tools' to `hugin'.

> found 491227 0.7.0~svn3191-1
Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently 
Debian has enblend 3.0
Bug marked as found in version 0.7.0~svn3191-1.

> # GUI is part of hugin, not hugin-tools, reassign and merge there.
> forcemerge 491227 491562
Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently 
Debian has enblend 3.0
Bug#491562: hugin: Calls enblend with a --compression option, but enblend does 
not have that option
Forcibly Merged 491227 491562.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491562: hugin: Calls enblend with a --compression option, but enblend does not have that option

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
forcemerge 491227 491562
thanks

On 2008-07-20 Bas Kloet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1
> Severity: important


> This is the relevant part of the hugin output:

> enblend --compression NONE -w -f3000x1500 -o panorama.tif panorama.tif
> panorama0001.tif panorama0002.tif panorama0003.tif panorama0004.tif
> panorama0005.tif 
>  enblend, version 3.0 
> Usage: enblend [options] -o OUTPUT INPUTS
[...]
> enblend: unrecognized option `--compression'
> make: *** [panorama.tif] Error 1
[...]

This a duplicate bug report, it has already been reported as
. Merging.
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#407126: marked as done (hugin-tools: nona and nona_gui binaries are very large)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:11:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#407126: hugin-tools: nona and nona_gui binaries are 
very large
has caused the Debian Bug report #407126,
regarding hugin-tools: nona and nona_gui binaries are very large
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
407126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407126
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin-tools
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal


Hi,

The nona and nona_gui binaries are some of the largest on my system:

$ ls -l /usr/bin | sort -rn -k 5|head
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root8689772 2006-08-28 22:33 hugin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7599308 2006-03-18 20:00 AbiWord-2.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7175116 2006-08-28 22:33 nona_gui
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7138380 2006-08-28 22:33 nona
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root6182732 2006-01-16 15:56 mplayer
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root5026708 2006-09-25 13:28 inkscape
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root5017492 2006-09-25 13:28 inkview
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root4016828 2006-05-04 09:11 Xprt
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root3372768 2006-03-29 13:46 gs-gpl
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root3085008 2006-01-30 21:09 gimp-2.2

I'm particularly sensitive to disk space as I'm running from a 4GB flash drive.

I suspect that the nona and nona_gui binaries are > 90% identical.  Would it be 
possible to eliminate one of them, and thereby save nearly 7MB?  Possible 
methods:

- Two links to the same executable which checks argv[0].
- An executable for nona and a script for nona_gui which calls nona with a 
  "gui" flag.
- Two small executables and a shared library.

I appreciate that not everyone shares my desire to optimise disk space and will 
understand if you choose to ignore this report.

Thanks,  Phil.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages hugin-tools depends on:
ii  hugin-data0.6.1-1data files for hugin
ii  libboost-thread1.33.1 1.33.1-4   portable C++ multi-threading
ii  libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.1-14 GCC support library
ii  libjpeg62 6b-13  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpano12-0   2.8.3-1panorama tools library
ii  libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++64.1.1-14   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4  3.8.0-3Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libwxbase2.6-02.6.3.2.1.5wxBase library (runtime) - non-GUI
ii  libwxgtk2.6-0 2.6.3.2.1.5wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages hugin-tools recommends:
ii  hugin 0.6.1-1a Panorama Tools GUI to make panor

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2007-01-16 Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin-tools
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: normal

> Hi,

> The nona and nona_gui binaries are some of the largest on my system:

> $ ls -l /usr/bin | sort -rn -k 5|head
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root8689772 2006-08-28 22:33 hugin
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7599308 2006-03-18 20:00 AbiWord-2.4
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7175116 2006-08-28 22:33 nona_gui
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root7138380 2006-08-28 22:33 nona
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root6182732 2006-01-16 15:56 mplayer
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root5026708 2006-09-25 13:28 inkscape
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root5017492 2006-09-25 13:28 inkview
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root4016828 2006-05-04 09:11 Xprt
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root3372768 2006-03-29 13:46 gs-gpl
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root   root3085008 2006-01-30 21:09 gimp-2.2

> I'm particularly sensitive to disk space as I'm running from a 4GB
> flash drive.

> I suspect that the nona and nona_gui binaries are > 90% identical.
> Would it be possible to eliminate one of them, and thereby save
> nearly 7MB?  Possible methods:

> - Two links to the same executable which checks argv[0].
> - An executable for nona and a script for nona_gui which calls nona with a 
>   "gui" flag.
> - Two small executables and a shared library.
[...]

Hello

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491562: hugin: Calls enblend with a --compression option, but enblend does not have that option

2008-07-20 Thread Bas Kloet
Package: hugin
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1
Severity: important


This is the relevant part of the hugin output:

enblend --compression NONE -w -f3000x1500 -o panorama.tif panorama.tif
panorama0001.tif panorama0002.tif panorama0003.tif panorama0004.tif
panorama0005.tif 
 enblend, version 3.0 
Usage: enblend [options] -o OUTPUT INPUTS

Common options:
 -aPre-assemble non-overlapping images
 -hPrint this help message
 -l number Number of levels to use (1 to 29)
 -o filename   Write output to file
 -vVerbose
 -wBlend across -180/+180 boundary
 -zUse LZW compression
 -xCheckpoint partial results

Extended options:
 -b kilobytes  Image cache block size (default=2MiB)
 -cUse CIECAM02 to blend colors
 -gAssociated alpha hack for Gimp (ver. < 2) and Cinepaint
 --gpu Use the graphics card to accelerate some computations.
 -f WIDTHxHEIGHT   Manually set the size of the output image.
   Useful for cropped and shifted input TIFF images,
   such as those produced by Nona.
 -m megabytes  Use this much memory before going to disk (default=1GiB)
 --visualize=FILE  Save the optimizer's results for debugging.

Mask generation options:
 --coarse-mask Use an approximation to speedup mask generation. Default.
 --fine-mask   Enables detailed mask generation. Slow. Use this if you
   have very narrow overlap regions.
 --optimizeTurn on mask optimization. This is the default.
 --no-optimize Turn off mask optimization.
 --save-mask=FILE  Save the generated mask to the given file.
 --load-mask=FILE  Use the mask in the given file instead of generating one.
enblend: unrecognized option `--compression'
make: *** [panorama.tif] Error 1



-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-tools  0.7.0~svn3191-1 CLI tools for Hugin
ii  libboost-thread1.34.11.34.1-11   portable C++ multi-threading
ii  libc62.7-12  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.3.1-6   GCC support library
ii  libpano13-0  2.9.12.dfsg-2   panorama tools library
ii  libstdc++6   4.3.1-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4 3.8.2-10Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libwxbase2.6-0   2.6.3.2.2-2 wxBase library (runtime) - non-GUI
ii  libwxgtk2.6-02.6.3.2.2-2 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t

hugin recommends no packages.

hugin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#443671: marked as done (hugin crashes on startup (invalid pointer))

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:36:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#443671: hugin crashes on startup (invalid pointer)
has caused the Debian Bug report #443671,
regarding hugin crashes on startup (invalid pointer)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
443671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=443671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1

Hugin crashes on startup, details below. I've tried to rebuild from debian 
source, but it crashes all the same. I'm runnig AMD64 Sid.

$ hugin
Panorama obj created
/usr/share/locale
*** glibc detected *** hugin: free(): invalid pointer: 0x01bf70a0 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0x2ba80181799a]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x2ba80181b58c]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0[0x2ba7fd054959]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN18wxButtonXmlHandler16DoCreateResourceEv+0x23f)[0x2ba7fc85259f]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x487)[0x2ba7fc891727]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxSizerXmlHandler16Handle_sizeritemEv+0xb8)[0x2ba7fc874f28]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x4ad)[0x2ba7fc89174d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateChildrenEP8wxObjectb+0x104)[0x2ba7fc891a54]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxSizerXmlHandler12Handle_sizerEv+0x10d)[0x2ba7fc87344d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x487)[0x2ba7fc891727]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxSizerXmlHandler16Handle_sizeritemEv+0xb8)[0x2ba7fc874f28]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x4ad)[0x2ba7fc89174d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateChildrenEP8wxObjectb+0x104)[0x2ba7fc891a54]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxSizerXmlHandler12Handle_sizerEv+0x10d)[0x2ba7fc87344d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x487)[0x2ba7fc891727]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateChildrenEP8wxObjectb+0x104)[0x2ba7fc891a54]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxFrameXmlHandler16DoCreateResourceEv+0x3d0)[0x2ba7fc85d660]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxXmlResourceHandler14CreateResourceEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_+0x1c2)[0x2ba7fc88f8a2]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource17CreateResFromNodeEP9wxXmlNodeP8wxObjectS3_P20wxXmlResourceHandler+0x487)[0x2ba7fc891727]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxXmlResource9LoadFrameEP7wxFrameP8wxWindowRK8wxString+0x68)[0x2ba7fc891e38]
hugin[0x4f56b2]
hugin[0x43a1ec]
hugin[0x41fd99]
hugin(_ZN12wxAppConsole10CallOnInitEv+0xd)[0x422cbd]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_Z7wxEntryRiPPw+0x22)[0x2ba7fd5b63f2]
hugin(_ZNK12wxWindowBase13DoGetBestSizeEv+0x572)[0x41e1d2]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x2ba8017c3b44]
hugin(_ZN12wxWindowBase8NavigateEi+0x79)[0x41e099]
=== Memory map: 
...
Aborted

Versions of packages:

$ dpkg -l | grep hugin
ii  hugin  0.6.1-1 a 
Panorama Tools GUI
ii  hugin-bin  0.6.1-1+b1  
hugin binaries
ii  hugin-data 0.6.1-1 data 
files for hugin
ii  hugin-tools0.6.1-1+b1  some 
tools for hugin

$ dpkg -l | grep libwx
ii  libwxbase2.6-0 2.6.3.2.1.5 
wxBase library (runtime)
ii  libwxbase2.6-dev   2.6.3.2.1.5 
wxBase library (development)
ii  libwxgtk2.6-0  

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#462670: marked as done (hugin: image selection desactivates itself when moving up or down images in image list)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:44:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#462670: hugin: image selection desactivates itself 
when moving up or down images in image list
has caused the Debian Bug report #462670,
regarding hugin: image selection desactivates itself when moving up or down 
images in image list
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
462670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1.2
Severity: normal

In the tab where you add and remove images, if you move up or down an image, 
after moving it,
the selection lefts the image you are moving. So that, if you want to move an 
image from the top
to the bottom, each time you make a move you have to reselect the image.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=es_DO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_DO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-bin 0.6.1-1.2  hugin binaries
ii  hugin-tools   0.6.1-1.2  some tools for hugin
ii  libpano12-bin 2.8.6-0.1  panorama tools utilities

hugin recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2008-01-26 Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1.2
> Severity: normal

> In the tab where you add and remove images, if you move up or down
> an image, after moving it, the selection lefts the image you are
> moving. So that, if you want to move an image from the top to the
> bottom, each time you make a move you have to reselect the image.

I do not experiece this broken behavior with the version currently
available in sid. Closing.

cu andreas

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#445342: marked as done (hugin crashes when quitting)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:39:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#445342: hugin crashes when quitting
has caused the Debian Bug report #445342,
regarding hugin crashes when quitting
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
445342: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal


I was just quitting (after some very strange results including tiny 
preview of panorama and refusal to estimate view angles) when hugin 
aborted.  Here is the backtrace

/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb6f1ff6d]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0xb6f23780]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN14wxListItemDataD1Ev+0x8d)[0xb7c53a3d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN19wxListLineDataArray7DoEmptyEv+0x5f)[0xb7c5403f]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN16wxListMainWindow16DoDeleteAllItemsEv+0x1a4)[0xb7c5b7c4]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN16wxListMainWindowD0Ev+0x3c)[0xb7c5bbac]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxWindowBase15DestroyChildrenEv+0x23)[0xb7d2acc3]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN8wxWindowD2Ev+0x5c)[0xb7c366bc]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN13wxControlBaseD2Ev+0x28)[0xb7cc50f8]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN17wxGenericListCtrlD2Ev+0xba)[0xb7c5549a]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN10wxListCtrlD0Ev+0x2d)[0xb7c6361d]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxWindowBase15DestroyChildrenEv+0x23)[0xb7d2acc3]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN8wxWindowD2Ev+0x5c)[0xb7c366bc]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxTopLevelWindowBaseD2Ev+0x91)[0xb7d270b1]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN19wxTopLevelWindowGTKD2Ev+0xa9)[0xb7c2d739]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN11wxFrameBaseD2Ev+0x4f)[0xb7cdeeef]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxFrameD2Ev+0x3f)[0xb7c864df]
hugin[0x8109f33]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxWindowBase15DestroyChildrenEv+0x23)[0xb7d2acc3]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN8wxWindowD0Ev+0x5c)[0xb7c3638c]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN9wxAppBase20DeletePendingObjectsEv+0x3e)[0xb7cb925e]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN9wxAppBase6OnIdleER11wxIdleEvent+0x2d)[0xb7cb92cd]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZNK12wxAppConsole11HandleEventEP12wxEvtHandlerMS0_FvR7wxEventES3_+0x35)[0xb7a03665]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxEvtHandler21ProcessEventIfMatchesERK21wxEventTableEntryBasePS_R7wxEvent+0x92)[0xb7a90e82]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN16wxEventHashTable11HandleEventER7wxEventP12wxEvtHandler+0x7b)[0xb7a90fcb]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxEvtHandler12ProcessEventER7wxEvent+0xcf)[0xb7a9114f]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN9wxAppBase11ProcessIdleEv+0x9c)[0xb7cb967c]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_Z17wxBeginBusyCursorP8wxCursor+0x93)[0xb7c111c3]
hugin[0x80f16ef]
hugin[0x80f24be]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZNK12wxAppConsole11HandleEventEP12wxEvtHandlerMS0_FvR7wxEventES3_+0x35)[0xb7a03665]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxEvtHandler21ProcessEventIfMatchesERK21wxEventTableEntryBasePS_R7wxEvent+0x92)[0xb7a90e82]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN16wxEventHashTable11HandleEventER7wxEventP12wxEvtHandler+0x7b)[0xb7a90fcb]
/usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxEvtHandler12ProcessEventER7wxEvent+0xcf)[0xb7a9114f]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN8wxWindow9DoSetSizeEi+0x35c)[0xb7c3705c]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN11wxSizerItem12SetDimensionE7wxPoint6wxSize+0x196)[0xb7d19756]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN11wxGridSizer13SetItemBoundsEP11wxSizerItem+0x9e)[0xb7d1a95e]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN15wxFlexGridSizer11RecalcSizesEv+0x1be)[0xb7d1babe]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxSizer6LayoutEv+0x24)[0xb7d19544]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxSizer12SetDimensionE+0x29)[0xb7d195b9]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN11wxSizerItem12SetDimensionE7wxPoint6wxSize+0x147)[0xb7d19707]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN10wxBoxSizer11RecalcSizesEv+0x1ee)[0xb7d1abde]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxSizer6LayoutEv+0x24)[0xb7d19544]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxSizer12SetDimensionE+0x29)[0xb7d195b9]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN12wxWindowBase6LayoutEv+0x61)[0xb7d2c6b1]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN20wxTopLevelWindowBase8DoLayoutEv+0xed)[0xb7d26aed]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN11wxFrameBase12SetStatusBarEP11wxStatusBar+0x4a)[0xb7cde2ea]
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(_ZN7wxFrame12SetStatusBarEP11wxStatusBar+0x32)[0xb7c86662]
/us

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#392093: marked as done (Hugin optimisation and preview broken?)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:33:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#392093: can't reproduce anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #392093,
regarding Hugin optimisation and preview broken?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
392093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal

*** Please type your report below this line ***

Well, hugin does not work anymore. It used to work when I used the
version from debian-multimedia.org. Even with only two images and seven
manually set or 19 autopano-sift control points the optimizer always returns:

"Optimizer run finished.
Results:
 average control point distance: 3.464987
 standard deviation: 1.607763
 maximum: 6.482469

*WARNING*: very high distortion coefficients (a,b,c) have been
estimated.
The results are probably invalid.
Only optimize all distortion parameters when many, well spread control
points are used.
Please reset the a,b and c parameters to zero and add more control
points

Apply the changes anyway?"

Applying and canceling seem to have the same zero effect on the
resulting panorama, and preview shows nothing but black. Even with just the 
images and no control points. 

I newer used the lower level tools without hugin, so I'm
not able to debug this on my own, sorry. I think the old version
displayed the images as they are in the preview if there were no control
point or optimisation was not done. Autopano-sift from
debian-multimedia.org finds 19 matching controlpoints, but
stiching in hugin seems broken.

Screen shots and the images I want to stitch:

http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/hugin_control_points.png
http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/hugin_optimisation.png
http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/hugin_preview.png
http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/img_0141.jpg
http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/img_0142.jpg

The few old .pto projects I have work and previews and tiff exports seem fine 
( http://kapsi.fi/~mcfrisk/skiing/kuvia/2006/isosyote/ ).
The field of view seems to get really big for some reason, but that I
can adjust manually. 

Below is the .pto, terminal output from hugin and some log I found from /tmp.

-Mikko

---seq_051.pto---
# hugin project file, version 1
p f2 w8513 h5959 v10  k0 n"TIFF c:NONE"
m g1 i0 f0

# image lines
i w3072 h2304 f0 K0a1 K0b0 K1a1 K1b0 K2a1 K2b0 Va0 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0 
a-0.348965 b1.0805 c5.24587 d-9505.05 e-38749.2 g0 p1.45266e-05 r-8.31102e-05 
t0 v17.8078 y9.76183e-05  u10 n"/home/mcfrisk/08042006/img_0141.jpg"
i w3072 h2304 f0 K0a1 K0b0 K1a1 K1b0 K2a1 K2b0 Va=0 Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 
a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 p0.067652 r-0.768484 t=0 v=0 y0.117025  u10 
n"/home/mcfrisk/08042006/img_0142.jpg"


# specify variables that should be optimized
v a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 v0 
v p1 r1 y1 
v 

# control points
c n0 N1 x1561 y1199 X829.838 Y1137.85 t0
c n0 N1 x2284 y611 X1568.9 Y571.921 t0
c n0 N1 x2767 y616 X2047.83 Y592.01 t0
c n0 N1 x2345 y1337 X1606.3 Y1295.92 t0
c n0 N1 x2256 y1668 X1509.11 Y1625.04 t0
c n0 N1 x2891 y1633 X2139.23 Y1604.49 t0
c n0 N1 x2982 y1909 X2221.15 Y1880.11 t0
c n0 N1 x2955 y1053 X.49 Y1031.1 t0

#hugin_options r0 e2
---

-hugin.log-
Panorama obj created
/usr/share/locale
Optimizing Variables
Strategy 1
Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints 
after 0 iteration(s):  3.69876302917719 units
Strategy 1
Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints 
after 1 iteration(s):  3.69876302917719 units

Optimizing Variables
Strategy 2
Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints 
after 0 iteration(s):  3.69876303001125 units
Strategy 2
Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints 
after 1 iteration(s):   3.6986375827792 units
Strategy 2
Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints 
after 2 iteration(s):  3.69863758031614 units


--/tmp/hugin_debug_optim_results.txt
# PTOptimizer script, written by hugin

p f2 w8513 h5959 v10  k0 n"TIFF c:NONE"
m g1 i0 f0

# image lines
i w3072 h2304 f0 a-0.348965 b1.0805 c5.24587 d-9505.05 e-38749.2 g0 
p1.45266e-05 r-8.31102e-05 t0 v17.8078 y9.76183e-05  u10 
n"/home/mcfrisk/peebin_kuvia_01/08042006/img_0141.jpg"
i w3072 h2304 f0 a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 p0.0668574 r-0.774068 t=0 v=0 
y0.114047  u10 n"/home/mcfrisk/peebin_kuvia_01/08042006/img_0142.jpg"


# specify variables that should be optimized
v a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 v0 
v p1 r1 y

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#416222: hugin: Crashes when loading unexpected file type

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2007-03-26 Mike Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: normal

> Just starting up hugin, I clicked on "Add individual images...".  In the
> popup, I changed the bottom-right drop-down from "All Image Files" to
> "All files (*)" and attempted to open a CR2 file (a RAW file from a
> Canon camera).  Hugin then crashed with this error in the terminal:

> ** (hugin:2162): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_focus: assertion 
> `height >= -1' failed
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'  
> what():  
> TIFFDecoderImpl::init(): Photometric tag is not set. A suitable 
> default was not found.
> (tiff.cxx:352)

> Aborted

> Oops.  Oh well, I guess I'll have to load my CR2 files in some other
> editor first.  It'd be nice if hugin could catch this and not crash,
> though.
[...]

Hello,
this still seems to be the case with 0.7.0~svn3191-1, it crashed with
the following error message when I tried to open
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14358768/IMG_3994.CR2 (>> 10 MB).

-
MainFrame::RestoreLayoutOnNextResize()
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
  what():
TIFFDecoderImpl::init(): Photometric tag is not set. A suitable default was not 
found.
(/build/buildd/hugin-0.7.0~svn3191/src/foreign/vigra/vigra_impex/tiff.cxx:369)

Aborted
-
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#422706: marked as done (hugin: Doesn't save project file)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:15:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#422706: hugin: Doesn't save project file
has caused the Debian Bug report #422706,
regarding hugin: Doesn't save project file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
422706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422706
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: important

Does not allow for saving of *.pto files. No error, nothing - just plain 
failure to save.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-bin 0.6.1-1hugin binaries
ii  hugin-tools   0.6.1-1some tools for hugin
ii  libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1panorama tools utilities

hugin recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2007-05-07 Johannes Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: important

> Does not allow for saving of *.pto files. No error, nothing - just
> plain failure to save.

Hello,

I cannot reproduce this with the version currently available n sid.
Closing.
cu andreas

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#407024: marked as done (hugin: may overwrite files without warning)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:11:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#407024: hugin: may overwrite files without warning
has caused the Debian Bug report #407024,
regarding hugin: may overwrite files without warning
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
407024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: important

severity important because it may lead to data loss

before stitching a panorama hugin lets you chose a name, however it removes a
given suffix (let's say .tiff) and replaces it with the standard suffix
(.tif).

However it does not warn before overwriting such a file.
So if a file foo.tif exists, and you enter foo.tiff as a target filename,
foo.tif is replaced with hugins output file. Note that it warns before
overwriting other files.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
C)

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-bin 0.6.1-1hugin binaries
ii  hugin-tools   0.6.1-1some tools for hugin
ii  libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1panorama tools utilities

hugin recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/
http://sudokugarden.de/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2007-01-15 Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: important

> severity important because it may lead to data loss

> before stitching a panorama hugin lets you chose a name, however it removes a
> given suffix (let's say .tiff) and replaces it with the standard suffix
> (.tif).

> However it does not warn before overwriting such a file.
> So if a file foo.tif exists, and you enter foo.tiff as a target filename,
> foo.tif is replaced with hugins output file. Note that it warns before
> overwriting other files.
[...]

hugin in sid (0.7.0~svn3191-1) still uses the standard suffix .tiff,
even if .tiff was given, however it asks before overwriting existing
files. (This also applies to the intermediate images, it warns about
existence of foo.tif if foo.tif is chosen as output.)

Closing.
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#392886: marked as done (Does not show .jpeg images in file dialog, only .jpg)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:52:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#392886: Does not show .jpeg images in file dialog, 
only .jpg
has caused the Debian Bug report #392886,
regarding Does not show .jpeg images in file dialog, only .jpg
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
392886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: minor

Hi,

the subject line already describes the whole problem: If I want to add JPEG 
files to a panorama, e.g. via the button "Add 
individual images...", then the resulting file dialog does not allow me to open 
.jpeg images - I have to rename them to use a 
.jpg extension before they appear in the list of files, or select "All files 
(*)".

While this is only a minor issue, it'd be nice if it could be fixed!

Cheers,

  Richard

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-bin 0.6.1-1hugin binaries
ii  hugin-tools   0.6.1-1some tools for hugin
ii  libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1panorama tools utilities

hugin recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2006-10-14 Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: minor

> Hi,

> the subject line already describes the whole problem: If I want to
> add JPEG files to a panorama, e.g. via the button "Add individual
> images...", then the resulting file dialog does not allow me to open
> .jpeg images - I have to rename them to use a .jpg extension before
> they appear in the list of files, or select "All files (*)".

Hello,

I have just doublechecked that hugin in sid shows .JPEG .JPG .jpeg and
.jpg.

Closing.
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#487365: marked as done (hugin: problem when calling enblend)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:47:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#487365: hugin: problem when calling enblend
has caused the Debian Bug report #487365,
regarding hugin: problem when calling enblend
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
487365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1.3
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Apparently, there is a problem with passing calling parameters to
enblend: it fails with:

command: "enblend" -v -z -f 7061x5563 -o "/.tif" "/.tif" "/0001.tif"
"/0002.tif" "/0003.tif" "/0004.tif" "/0005.tif" "/0006.tif" "/0007.tif"
"/0008.tif" "/0009.tif" "/0010.tif" "/0011.tif"
failed with error code: 1

Obviously, the output file should have a better name, and the inpu files
are stored in /tmp/ and not in the root dir.  Calling enblend manually
with these corrections, it works.

(I have to thank you for causing me to waste a lot of time playing with
huge panoramic pictures by making hugin easily available as a .deb :-)

cheers
- -- vbi


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (199, 
'oldstable'), (60, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages hugin depends on:
ii  hugin-bin 0.6.1-1.3  hugin binaries
ii  hugin-tools   0.6.1-1.3  some tools for hugin
ii  libpano12-bin 2.8.3-1panorama tools utilities

hugin recommends no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

iEYEARECAAYFAkhcy1AACgkQi6Qxi+Wn99bdaACeN1duTI2pZusN+ekEISXynXp3
jW8AnR2wbMdw06JTHlqKMC+G2xZbWfPp
=c1Q5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2008-06-21 Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1.3
> Severity: normal

> Hi,

> Apparently, there is a problem with passing calling parameters to
> enblend: it fails with:

> command: "enblend" -v -z -f 7061x5563 -o "/.tif" "/.tif" "/0001.tif"
> "/0002.tif" "/0003.tif" "/0004.tif" "/0005.tif" "/0006.tif" "/0007.tif"
> "/0008.tif" "/0009.tif" "/0010.tif" "/0011.tif"
> failed with error code: 1

> Obviously, the output file should have a better name, and the inpu files
> are stored in /tmp/ and not in the root dir.  Calling enblend manually
> with these corrections, it works.
[...]

I cannot reproduce this error with hugin in sid, closing.
cu andreas

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#415977: marked as done (Package missing, unstable)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:36:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#415977: Package missing, unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #415977,
regarding Package missing, unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
415977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: enblend
Version:
Severity: grave

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The package is missing.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686

Debian Release: 4.0
500 unstable mirror.hamakor.org.il

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
===-+-===
|


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2007-03-23 "Sam (Uli) Freed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: enblend
> Version:
> Severity: grave

> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> The package is missing.
[...]

Enblend is now part of Debian lenny and sid. (There is also a version
for etch on backports.org.) Closing.
cu andreas

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#428295: hugin uninstallable in sid / missing libboost-thread

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forcemerge 484754 428295
Bug#484754: hugin: Hugin won't install, unmet dependencies.
Bug#428295: hugin uninstallable in sid / missing libboost-thread
Forcibly Merged 428295 484754.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#428295: hugin uninstallable in sid / missing libboost-thread

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
forcemerge 484754 428295
thanks
On 2007-06-10 Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1

> Hi,
> hugin is currently uninstallable in pure SID as 
> libboost-thread1.33.1 does not exist anymore. 

484754 and 428295 are the same bug. The issue is fixed in sid by hugin
version 0.7.0~svn3191-1.

Merging the bugs, therefore also closing this one.
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#405862: hugin: configured to call autopano.exe, should be autopano (and needs dependency)

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2007-01-06 Norman Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: important

> Clicking the 'create control points' button results in the following error 
> message:

> command: autopanog.exe --output autopano_result_tempfile.pto --imagelist 
> /tmp/ap_imgnamesRyj0zq
> failed with error code: 127

> The reason is of course there is no autopanog.exe on a Debian system.
> The application should be reconfigured to use autopanog, and will the
> maintainer kindly aadd a dependency on package autopano-sift?

Hello,

as already noted autopano-sift-* cannot be shipped in Debian due to
patent problems.

Anyway 0.7.0~svn3191-1 invokes autopano-sift-c by default. This bug
could beclosed if the Suggests was changed from "autopano-sift" to
"autopano-sift-c".
cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#484754: marked as done (hugin: Hugin won't install, unmet dependencies.)

2008-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:19:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#484754: hugin: Hugin won't install, unmet dependencies.
has caused the Debian Bug report #484754,
regarding hugin: Hugin won't install, unmet dependencies.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
484754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484754
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hugin
Version: 0.6.1-1+lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Depends: hugin-bin (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: hugin-bin (< 0.6.1-1+lenny1.1~) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: hugin-tools (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: hugin-tools (< 0.6.1-1+lenny1.1~) but it is not going to be installed

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1

On 2008-06-06 Leo Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 0.6.1-1+lenny1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> Depends: hugin-bin (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: hugin-bin (< 0.6.1-1+lenny1.1~) but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: hugin-tools (>= 0.6.1-1+lenny1) but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: hugin-tools (< 0.6.1-1+lenny1.1~) but it is not going to be installed
[...]

This bug only applies to 0.6.1-1+lenny1, libboost-thread1.33.1 has
been removed. The new version in sid is installable.

Closing.
cu andreas

--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently Debian has enblend 3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-07-17 Steve Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: hugin-tools
> Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1
> Severity: important

> When generating a blended panorama, hugin attempts to run enblend
> with the option
>   --compression NONE
> but enblend 3.0 (the one currently in Debian) doesn't recognise
> that option.

> It's in enblend's upstream changelog as they progress to 3.1;
> looks like 3.1 isn't released yet.

> 2007-10-22  dangelo

> * src/enblend.cc: added --compression option to allow
> more detailed specification of the compression type and
> quality (especially for jpeg output)

Hello,

imho this should be severity serious, since hugin (GUI) always tries
to run enblend.
cu andreas



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel


[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: hugin-tools
Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1
Severity: normal

Hello,

previously enblend was optional, the hugin GUI offered optons to stitch
without it. Nowadays enblend is required. This is a limitation
of the GUI, nona could still stitch without enblend.

I would suggest dropping enblend from hugin-tools' Recommends and
adding it to the Depends of the hugin package, since the latter
contains the GUI tools.
cu andreas



___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel