Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0 and reverse build-dependencies of libpq-dev

2016-11-02 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Carsten Leonhardt 2016-11-02 <871syuywdw@arioch.leonhardt.eu>
> Dear Postgres Packagers,
> 
> The new libssl1.0-dev and libssl-dev packages conflict with each other,
> so cannot be mixed during a package build.
> 
> Because my pacakge bacula links with both libssl and libpq, it looks
> like I need to coordinate with you.
> 
> Do you plan to release a new version of libpq-dev that depends on
> libssl1.0-dev or will you stay with libssl-dev (and thus switch to
> openssl 1.1)?

You should switch to 1.1 if that's an option :), but as we are just
discussing on #debian-devel, the libssl-dev dependency of libpq-dev
will simply go away completely. I'll be uploading later today.

Thanks for making us aware,
Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-postgresql-public mailing list
Pkg-postgresql-public@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public

[Pkg-postgresql-public] OpenSSL 1.1.0 and reverse build-dependencies of libpq-dev

2016-11-02 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Dear Postgres Packagers,

The new libssl1.0-dev and libssl-dev packages conflict with each other,
so cannot be mixed during a package build.

Because my pacakge bacula links with both libssl and libpq, it looks
like I need to coordinate with you.

Do you plan to release a new version of libpq-dev that depends on
libssl1.0-dev or will you stay with libssl-dev (and thus switch to
openssl 1.1)?

 - Carsten

___
Pkg-postgresql-public mailing list
Pkg-postgresql-public@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public