[DRE-maint] Bug#589496: marked as done (`read_events': uninitialized constant INotify::Notifier::EINVAL (NameError))
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:27:21 +0100
with message-id <20121216222721.GA30104@spin>
and subject line Fixed in newer version.
has caused the Debian Bug report #589496,
regarding `read_events': uninitialized constant INotify::Notifier::EINVAL
(NameError)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
589496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: librb-inotify-ruby1.8
Version: 0.7.0-4
Severity: normal
Sometimes small tool which I use to watch changes in directory fails with the
following stacktrace:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rb-inotify/notifier.rb:228:in `read_events': uninitialized
constant INotify::Notifier::EINVAL (NameError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rb-inotify/notifier.rb:211:in `process'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rb-inotify/notifier.rb:194:in `run'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fssm/backends/inotify.rb:20:in `run'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fssm/monitor.rb:24:in `run'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fssm.rb:17:in `monitor'
from scripts/watchfiles:10
'watchfiles' script is attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages librb-inotify-ruby1.8 depends on:
ii libffi-ruby1.8 0.6.3debian-1 load dynamic libraries, bind funct
ii libinotify-ruby1.8 0.0.2-4 Ruby interface to Linux's inotify
ii ruby1.81.8.7.299-1 Interpreter of object-oriented scr
librb-inotify-ruby1.8 recommends no packages.
librb-inotify-ruby1.8 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'rubygems'
require 'fssm'
def rebuild_site(relative)
Process.exit
end
begin
FSSM.monitor(nil, ARGV) do
update {|base, relative| rebuild_site(relative)}
delete {|base, relative| rebuild_site(relative)}
create {|base, relative| rebuild_site(relative)}
end
rescue FSSM::CallbackError => e
Process.exit
end
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Mikhail,
This bug has been fixed upstream by the following commit:
https://github.com/nex3/rb-inotify/commit/4252603c616a6f9bfaa3adfa638ea3d669344fd1
which is contained in versions >= 0.8.2.
I am therefore closing this bug.
Cédric--- End Message ---
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#569871: marked as done (libactiverecord-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency on ruby 1.9.0)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:20:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line Package removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569871, regarding libactiverecord-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency on ruby 1.9.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 569871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569871 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libactiverecord-ruby1.9 Version: 2.3.3-1 Severity: serious User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby190transition Hi, Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream. Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0. This will no longer work with 1.9.1. You can either: - port your package to Ruby 1.9.1 - drop the Ruby 1.9.X binary package There is more information on http://wiki.debian.org/Ruby191Transition Thanks -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.3.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package sigit has been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.--- End Message --- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#569876: marked as done (libactivesupport-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency on ruby 1.9.0)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:21:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Package removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569876, regarding libactivesupport-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency on ruby 1.9.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 569876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569876 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libactivesupport-ruby1.9 Version: 2.3.3-1 Severity: serious User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby190transition Hi, Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream. Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0. This will no longer work with 1.9.1. You can either: - port your package to Ruby 1.9.1 - drop the Ruby 1.9.X binary package There is more information on http://wiki.debian.org/Ruby191Transition Thanks -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.3.3-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package sigit has been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.--- End Message --- ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Re: [DRE-maint] [Pkg-javascript-devel] git-buildpackage workflow
On 16/12/2012 12:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I like that our current structures work well for unstable, testing, > stable and oldstable - i.e. that it is only tricky to handle > experimental which we make no promises for anyway. > > I suspect the better approach than force-merging with "--strategy ours" > would be to rebase experimental on top of master. > > If you insist on trating experimental as mainline, could you perhaps > check if anyone else in Debian does similar and has documented their > practice and experiences with it? Damn me, i did not understand that rebase was what i was missing. Thank you for your answers, i won't insist. Jérémy. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#695774: redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter
The bug comes from configuring two instances with the same db user. dbconfig-common regenerates a random password when configuring the second instance, wiping the password set for the first instance that has already been recorded in database.yml. Workaround : get the password of the second instance yy from /etc/redmine/yy/database.yml and set it in the database.yml of the first instance. I am working on a fix. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
