On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 03:58:17PM +0100, François Cami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Java maintainers have orphaned most, if not all, of the Java stack
> in Fedora, in favor of modules:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MQMRQVENBLDRS67WLNQ7EOCMSDI5WIET/
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ITDMQ7UACH4CL6754IMOYQ45QOBVPOX6/
>
> As this change would lead into a lot of retired packages (maven and
> all that depends on it, like Dogtag), there was a proposal to create a
> SIG that would take care of these packages.
> It does not seem to have advanced much for the past month:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/I7AP2G7KUBGT6FP4GJBDBLCHZJ54YZG2/#I7AP2G7KUBGT6FP4GJBDBLCHZJ54YZG2
>
> And it seems unrealistic for the Dogtag and FreeIPA teams to take over
> all these packages.
>
> In the future packages will be able to BuildRequire modules:
> https://tree.taiga.io/project/modularity-wg/epic/12
> but it is not possible yet and there is no ETA.
>
> The consequence is that Dogtag will be considered FTBFS as soon as
> maven and other dependencies are retired.
> Dogtag will therefore will be retired (along with FreeIPA) if
> maintenance for the dependencies is not picked up.
>
> There does not seem to be a good solution except by moving both Dogtag
> and FreeIPA to modules (where we could BR: existing modules) before
> Fedora releng starts to retire our packages.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> François
>
We are already in a module for RHEL 8. I don't perceive any major
disadvantage if we have to move to modules in Fedora too. Are there
any big reasons, from a user point of view, against moving to
modules?
Thanks,
Fraser
> ___
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
___
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
