Re: plasma workspace integration for akonadi

2014-02-10 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014, Heena Mahour wrote:
 Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case .
 It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it
 should use models throughout and all is based on QGraphicsView .

just for completeless,
dataengines don't have anything to do with qgraphicsview.
also, in plasma2 dataengines can export normal qabstractitemmodels. the 
difference with model imports is that are shared between multiple applets, 
that with a potentially ubiquitous (and big footprint) as akonadi, can make 
the difference

-- 
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49429
---


I'd rather have it names plasmapkg2, the 5 prefix sounds weird in the Plasma 
context. (Most of the other visible Plasma bits carry version 2.0).

- Sebastian Kügler


On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 7:45 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.
 
 
 Repository: plasma-framework
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hrvoje Senjan
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49433
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Sebastian Kügler


On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:45 a.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:45 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.
 
 
 Repository: plasma-framework
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hrvoje Senjan
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Commit Hook

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49435
---


This review has been submitted with commit 
cc34d2c17ef44f4aabb10986d27b5a4dc088baf2 by Hrvoje Senjan to branch master.

- Commit Hook


On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:45 a.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:45 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.
 
 
 Repository: plasma-framework
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hrvoje Senjan
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Hrvoje Senjan

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
---

(Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m.)


Status
--

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.


Repository: plasma-framework


Description
---

...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)


Diffs
-

  src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/


Testing
---

Builds


Thanks,

Hrvoje Senjan

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Mark Gaiser

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49438
---


Ehh, the 2 doesn't make sense anymore since the plasma library is now 
following the kde frameworks version numbering. Right now it's version is 
4.96.0 and is going to be 5.0 once all of frameworks is released in it's final 
state.

For reference: 
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=plasma-framework.gita=blobdiffh=f873539cd0814e3d512ae37278feb57738f5fdc9hp=8fb14bba0ca3983cb3503ea780c66b932816a1a1hb=f9e5cc949ff3719ec553955fba09f4efbc189c07f=CMakeLists.txt

- Mark Gaiser


On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.
 
 
 Repository: plasma-framework
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hrvoje Senjan
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Minutes Monday Plasma hangout

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Present: Alex Fiestas, David Edmundson, Jens Reuterberg, Marco Martin, Martin 
Gräßlin, Sebastian Kügler, Vishesh Handa

10th February, 2014, 12:00 CET

sebas
- plasmoids can now be dbus-activated (will blog)
- positive feedback to highdpi
- wants to merge themeswitch branch
- did some sketching for a wallpaper dialog, will implement

Vishesh
- Baloo is merged in master, almost done for 4.x
- Will start work on krunner w/ Aleix

Martin
- got KWindowSystem to build without X11 (means: two builds)
- Can run Kate and Konsole on Wayland now (even with KDE integration plugin) 
(!)
- is now looking into drkonqi
- is dog-fooding now to get as many issues as possible shaken out
- tries fixing oxygen windeco on WL
- submitted new hint for undecorated windows to EWMH (to get rid of Motif)

Marco
- Merged branch with attached properties (see 
http://notmart.org/blog/2014/02/making-plasmoids-qml-api-better/ )
- systemtray needs some more work for having multiple systrays work
- Fixes in tooltips
- Improvements to popup-slide effect in progress

Jens
- Setting up group of designers
- Talking to journalists
- Get work out that already exist
- Work on logos (Baloo, e.g.)
- Planning porting icon themes

David
- Bugfixing all over the place
- will fix more bugs listed for plasma-shell product
- wants to move notes plasmoid into kde-workspace (into generic)
- Fix tooltips atop panel popups

Alex
- PAM module for kwallet works in Plasma 1 now
- Talks with Teo and Valentin about KSecretService in KF5


General Remarks:
- it would be nice if we could somehow streamline the different things that 
install things and have backends (ghns, bodega, muon, packagekit, ...)
- testing Baloo / Milou is important now
- need to file bug in ghns about downloading data
- need to add artwork freeze to schedule
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: plasma workspace integration for akonadi

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:25:41 Marco Martin wrote:
 On Saturday 08 February 2014, Heena Mahour wrote:
  Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case .
  It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it
  should use models throughout and all is based on QGraphicsView .
 
 just for completeless,
 dataengines don't have anything to do with qgraphicsview.
 also, in plasma2 dataengines can export normal qabstractitemmodels. the 
 difference with model imports is that are shared between multiple applets, 
 that with a potentially ubiquitous (and big footprint) as akonadi, can make 
 the difference

Yes, with the new dataengines, this would be just fine.

BUT ... we don't have those models in KF5, which means we'd need kdepimlibs 
ported, which ... well, rewind to the start of this thread.

The UI needs a complete rewrite as well, which means that basically everything 
will have to be done from scratch, minus the UI and interaction concepts, 
which I think are pretty sound.
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: plasma workspace integration for akonadi

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, February 07, 2014 19:25:55 Kevin Krammer wrote:
 On Friday, 2014-02-07, 18:26:20, Marco Martin wrote:
  On Friday 07 February 2014 16:28:20 Kevin Krammer wrote:
   The GSOC idea referenced below is not about data at all, it is about
   state.
  
   Akonadi state information and control works via D-Bus, so it would be
   possible to do a client for that without linking to libakonadi-kde.
  
   This was just brought up as an option, since Plasma/workspace
   development
   and KDEPIM libs development are currently not using the same Qt version
   and
   potentially will not during the GSOC period.
 
  my concern is:
  * is this worth, as opposed to waiting for kdepimlibs?
 
 I mostly brought this up as an options, it might or might not be worthwhile.
 Using D-Bus directly might allow to only transfer information that is
 needed, on the other hand making a QML adaptor for things like
 Akonadi::AgentInstanceModel will be faster and easier to code.
 
 Obviously also a difference in dependencies if that matters.
 
  * is accessing those dbus functions something that kdepimlibs doesn't
  provide? 
 
 No. But kdepimlibs obviously involves more C++ classes.
 
  * *if* a Qt5 kdepimlibs was available, would this way be
  preferrable anyways?
 
 My understanding is that there is a frameworks branch in kdepimlibs which
 at  some point was fully build-able.  No idea what the current status is.

That's my status as well. I hope the upcoming PIM sprint will shed some light 
on this. I'm pretty sure though that we're looking at at least another two 
workspace releases until PIM has been ported to KF5.

(Note, that still doesn't mean that Akonadi has to have been ported, if I 
understand the architecture well, it should be entirely possible to have 
Akonadi(Qt4) used by kdepimlibs/5 (and even KMail4) at the same time. (Please 
correct me if I'm wrong.)

That leads me to a migration path which involves kdepimlibs as the first step, 
so we can actually get at the data in akonadi. Which also means that a custom 
pim-status-lib will be replaced very quickly, making it quite a waste to 
implement it at high-enough quality.

Otherwise, basic status information is something that should be done using 
Statusnotifier items.

 I've repeated that specific GSOC idea for a couple of years now, either
 there  were no takers or they didn't convince us that they could
 successfully do it.
 
 I didn't re-add the idea again, mostly because of the lack of interest but 
 also because of the bad timing for this year (focus on different Qt
 versions).
 
 Since it is a old idea it might also have to be reevaluated, e.g. whether
 it  fits into the current or future concepts of our workspace offerings,
 etc.
 
 The only reason this was listed as  KDEPIM idea was that Plasma was 
 consistently filling all the GSOC slots it could get while KDE PIM usually
 had  some to spare.
 This is almost 100% user interface and user interaction work.

Hoping that the stuff in kdepimlibs is now up to the job (searchfolders 
working well enough, for example), yes.
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg

2014-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler


 On Feb. 10, 2014, 12:03 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
  Ehh, the 2 doesn't make sense anymore since the plasma library is now 
  following the kde frameworks version numbering. Right now it's version is 
  4.96.0 and is going to be 5.0 once all of frameworks is released in it's 
  final state.
  
  For reference: 
  http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=plasma-framework.gita=blobdiffh=f873539cd0814e3d512ae37278feb57738f5fdc9hp=8fb14bba0ca3983cb3503ea780c66b932816a1a1hb=f9e5cc949ff3719ec553955fba09f4efbc189c07f=CMakeLists.txt

That's invisible. What is visible in version numbering are numbers of imports, 
versions of binaries, etc. Those are all aligned to 2.


- Sebastian


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49438
---


On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler.
 
 
 Repository: plasma-framework
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Hrvoje Senjan
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Review Request 115623: Add a property to tooltip to enable/disable tooltips

2014-02-10 Thread David Edmundson

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115623/
---

Review request for Plasma.


Repository: plasma-framework


Description
---

Add a property to tooltip to enable/disable tooltips

This is useful to be able to disable tooltips when a dialog exists.

We don't use the QQuickItem::enabled property as this propagates onto
children which would have adverse side effects.


See https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115626/


Diffs
-

  src/declarativeimports/core/tooltip.h a51c287 
  src/declarativeimports/core/tooltip.cpp afcbdef 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115623/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

David Edmundson

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: plasma workspace integration for akonadi

2014-02-10 Thread Heena Mahour
apart from re-implementation of lion mail , what about the other tasks I
mentioned , these are fine? these will also require akonadi client library
of kdepimlibs .






On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:

 On Friday, February 07, 2014 19:25:55 Kevin Krammer wrote:
  On Friday, 2014-02-07, 18:26:20, Marco Martin wrote:
   On Friday 07 February 2014 16:28:20 Kevin Krammer wrote:
The GSOC idea referenced below is not about data at all, it is about
state.
   
Akonadi state information and control works via D-Bus, so it would be
possible to do a client for that without linking to libakonadi-kde.
   
This was just brought up as an option, since Plasma/workspace
development
and KDEPIM libs development are currently not using the same Qt
 version
and
potentially will not during the GSOC period.
  
   my concern is:
   * is this worth, as opposed to waiting for kdepimlibs?
 
  I mostly brought this up as an options, it might or might not be
 worthwhile.
  Using D-Bus directly might allow to only transfer information that is
  needed, on the other hand making a QML adaptor for things like
  Akonadi::AgentInstanceModel will be faster and easier to code.
 
  Obviously also a difference in dependencies if that matters.
 
   * is accessing those dbus functions something that kdepimlibs doesn't
   provide?
 
  No. But kdepimlibs obviously involves more C++ classes.
 
   * *if* a Qt5 kdepimlibs was available, would this way be
   preferrable anyways?
 
  My understanding is that there is a frameworks branch in kdepimlibs which
  at  some point was fully build-able.  No idea what the current status is.

 That's my status as well. I hope the upcoming PIM sprint will shed some
 light
 on this. I'm pretty sure though that we're looking at at least another two
 workspace releases until PIM has been ported to KF5.

 (Note, that still doesn't mean that Akonadi has to have been ported, if I
 understand the architecture well, it should be entirely possible to have
 Akonadi(Qt4) used by kdepimlibs/5 (and even KMail4) at the same time.
 (Please
 correct me if I'm wrong.)

 That leads me to a migration path which involves kdepimlibs as the first
 step,
 so we can actually get at the data in akonadi. Which also means that a
 custom
 pim-status-lib will be replaced very quickly, making it quite a waste to
 implement it at high-enough quality.

 Otherwise, basic status information is something that should be done using
 Statusnotifier items.

  I've repeated that specific GSOC idea for a couple of years now, either
  there  were no takers or they didn't convince us that they could
  successfully do it.
 
  I didn't re-add the idea again, mostly because of the lack of interest
 but
  also because of the bad timing for this year (focus on different Qt
  versions).
 
  Since it is a old idea it might also have to be reevaluated, e.g.
 whether
  it  fits into the current or future concepts of our workspace offerings,
  etc.
 
  The only reason this was listed as  KDEPIM idea was that Plasma was
  consistently filling all the GSOC slots it could get while KDE PIM
 usually
  had  some to spare.
  This is almost 100% user interface and user interaction work.

 Hoping that the stuff in kdepimlibs is now up to the job (searchfolders
 working well enough, for example), yes.
 --
 sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
 ___
 Plasma-devel mailing list
 Plasma-devel@kde.org
 https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel




-- 
-Heena
Season of kde'12 participant
Google Summer of Code 2013
Delhi College of Engineering(COE),India
http://about.me/heena.mahour
http://heenamahour.blogspot.in
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-10 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014, David Faure wrote:
 
 * OK if I run astyle-kdelibs in both, to harmonize coding style?
 (drawback: it makes forward-porting changes from 4.x harder)

+1 if you can do it.

 + Can you add both to http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List?
 This includes figuring out who to write down as maintainer :)
 
 + plasma-framework/README.md should be completed with a description
 
 + according to http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies, the autotests
 and tests in plasma-framework should move to the toplevel.
 + In kactivities, the actual autotests like ./tests/core should move to an
 autotests subdir.

the above points should be done..
only thing, in kactivities frameworks should still be merged in master (Ivan, 
would this be ok?)

 + kactivites needs a README.md, a kactivities.yaml and a .reviewboardrc
 
 Both frameworks need to be ported to ecm_generate_headers and
 ecm_generate_pri_file. Do you want to look at that too?

sure.. but what I need to do for that exactly? ;)

Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-10 Thread Ivan Čukić

 the above points should be done..
 only thing, in kactivities frameworks should still be merged in master
 (Ivan, would this be ok?)

Fine by me :) (even more than 'fine')
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-10 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 10 February 2014, Ivan Čukić wrote:
  the above points should be done..
  only thing, in kactivities frameworks should still be merged in master
  (Ivan, would this be ok?)
 
 Fine by me :) (even more than 'fine')

ok.
i suppose kdesrc-build has to be updated beforehand tough to pick up the 
correct ones? (how?)

-- 
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


You need things done? We fix! You see!

2014-02-10 Thread Jens Reuterberg
With that eloquent start I wanted to say that some of you may now we now have 
our project page up and running (thanks to the webteam, Alex Fiestas and the 
Sysadmins)   vdesign.kde.org

We also have one open group at the KDE forums 
http://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=285 where anyone of you can jump in and 
ask for design help on any subject. Anything at all.

But in talking with some of the Plasma Devs one point became clear - some 
things that we work on is not... well its not news ready and in those 
situation perhaps getting help from the wider community may not be the best 
thing. 
But don't worry there are 13 designers all sworn to secrecy who also have 
their secret club house in the KDE forums where we talk about the projects 
we work on in house 

You can either contact me here via the list, the artist list or the promo list 
(depending on what you need help with) or safer and quicker - tell me via mail 
at jens at ohyran dot se.

As for open design issues, no matter how trivial tell me here and I'll repost 
them in the forums - or post them yourself! The more information and work we 
have the more people see stuff is going on and more will join in! 

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


New framework: KRunner

2014-02-10 Thread Aleix Pol
Hi,
During the last sprint, it was decided to split KRunner out of the plasma
framework, since it seems like we want to use it but then there are a
couple of alternatives.

To that end, I created a new repository (kde:krunner) that contains the
relevant code and I'll remove it from plasma and add a dependency on
krunner from kde-workspace. I'll do it by tomorrow, so it doesn't come up
as a surprise.

For the moment, I marked it as a tier3, arguably it should be tier4 since
there's the possibility of ending up deprecating it, but we're still not
there.

Cheers!
Aleix
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Review Request 115641: Ensure to not call X11 specific calls if we are not on platform X11

2014-02-10 Thread Martin Gräßlin

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115641/
---

Review request for Plasma.


Repository: plasma-framework


Description
---

Ensure to not call X11 specific calls if we are not on platform X11

This fixes a bunch of possible crashy code when trying to run
applications linking plasma-framework on platform Wayland.


Diffs
-

  src/declarativeimports/core/dialogshadows.cpp 
5a0ee82576e61430a1e7a330a5ad973ef75067c9 
  src/plasma/private/effectwatcher.cpp 495fa5986817fe325a3aea349980fb9e627a6fa7 
  src/plasma/private/effectwatcher_p.h 386a839bc3c31ae53a2bae5c382ec00f0dad3ef6 
  src/shell/panelshadows.cpp d2fa85bb8644d0d610e69c26c0fad7828868d277 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115641/diff/


Testing
---

kwin-compositing-kcm no longer crashes when started on Wayland


Thanks,

Martin Gräßlin

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel