[Powerdevil] [Bug 348529] When screen is locked, turn off screen with a shorter timeout
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529 --- Comment #54 from jonathan haney --- Sadly the short answer is no. TBH I didn't think anyone that would want "Switch off after" disabled but "Switch off while locked" enabled. Allowing "Switch off after" to be set to 0 would be trivial and would allow for this behavior but I haven't traced its usage fully so I'm not super confident in it not causing new issues atm. However, now that I think about it I'm pretty certain they'll ask me to move the code out of dpms and make a special home for it elsewhere. If so it might be a few weeks before I can resubmit due to health issues but you'll probably end up getting that behavior sooner than 8 years. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Powerdevil] [Bug 348529] When screen is locked, turn off screen with a shorter timeout
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529 jonathan haney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.ha...@gmail.com --- Comment #51 from jonathan haney --- Created attachment 156995 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=156995=edit Bug fix sample Looks like the last attempt got shot down by the maintainers. So out of curiosity I spent a few hours and have a local fix with some changes around dpms.cpp/h dpmsconfig.cpp/h I adding an extra timer and the GUI controls seen in the attachment above. I think I spent more time figuring out how to test this and handling dependencies vs actually writing code :P If people think the interface is good I'll go jump some hoops to figure out how to put in the merge request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
