Re: Bugsplashing

2012-06-04 Thread Thijs Heus
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:


  2) Are the components useful? I could see a lot of use for grouping bugs,
  and trying to keep a component bug free. But again - only when it is in
  use. And what is the difference between e.g. containment-desktop and
  desktop?

 i think components are fine, maybe there could be a couple more but thise
 are
 fine. in this particular case containment-desktop means strictly what
 happens
 in the desktop background area, while desktop is the plasma desktop shell
 application, the actual executable that creates desktops, panels etc. yeah
 i
 know, jargon :/

 OK, clear. If there is one place where jargon is allowed, it is BKO, as
long as it is being used consistently. I guess there has been a fair amount
of mix up there, but I'll check.

 3) There is a fair amount of bugs that need to be treated with the
  authority and wisdom of a developer. I can be almost certain that a bug
 is
  a wont fix, but only a dev can mark it as such. I could keep a list of
 such
  bugs, and throw them over this mailing list once in a while, or perhaps a
  flag for_devs could work here. This would not be meant as a kicking
 devs
  to fix a bug, but should only take 2 minutes of time to comment/check
  out/close/whatever.

 something that would be very useful i think is a day of irc meeting with
 you
 guys to do this kind of not immediately obvious prioritization and maybe
 with
 people taking tasks for actually fixing the ones with more priority.

 next weeks are quite thehorror (talking at least for me and probably
 aaron) we
 could manage to do something in the second half of june a bit before
 akademy
 perhaps?


I'll try and keep a list of bugs to check. When life allows it, I lazily am
around at irc, so if anyone is bored ;)
A (minor) bugdays would be useful, but in the case of late June I would
combine oldbug-compression with the beta-polishing and a focus on the
latest bugs and regressions. Other than that, there is no real urgency for
me - as long as we can work our way to a reliable (and short) buglist.

Thijs
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Bugsplashing

2012-06-04 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf

On 06/04/2012 11:41 AM, Thijs Heus wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com 
mailto:notm...@gmail.com wrote:



 2) Are the components useful? I could see a lot of use for
grouping bugs,
 and trying to keep a component bug free. But again - only when
it is in
 use. And what is the difference between e.g. containment-desktop and
 desktop?

i think components are fine, maybe there could be a couple more
but thise are
fine. in this particular case containment-desktop means strictly
what happens
in the desktop background area, while desktop is the plasma
desktop shell
application, the actual executable that creates desktops, panels
etc. yeah i
know, jargon :/

OK, clear. If there is one place where jargon is allowed, it is BKO, 
as long as it is being used consistently. I guess there has been a 
fair amount of mix up there, but I'll check.


 3) There is a fair amount of bugs that need to be treated with the
 authority and wisdom of a developer. I can be almost certain
that a bug is
 a wont fix, but only a dev can mark it as such. I could keep a
list of such
 bugs, and throw them over this mailing list once in a while, or
perhaps a
 flag for_devs could work here. This would not be meant as a
kicking devs
 to fix a bug, but should only take 2 minutes of time to
comment/check
 out/close/whatever.

something that would be very useful i think is a day of irc
meeting with you
guys to do this kind of not immediately obvious prioritization and
maybe with
people taking tasks for actually fixing the ones with more priority.

next weeks are quite thehorror (talking at least for me and
probably aaron) we
could manage to do something in the second half of june a bit
before akademy
perhaps?


I'll try and keep a list of bugs to check. When life allows it, I 
lazily am around at irc, so if anyone is bored ;)
A (minor) bugdays would be useful, but in the case of late June I 
would combine oldbug-compression with the beta-polishing and a focus 
on the latest bugs and regressions. Other than that, there is no real 
urgency for me - as long as we can work our way to a reliable (and 
short) buglist.


Thijs

Some bugs need to be fixed before 4.9 is out: for example the Weather 
Station applet does not display anything anymore (API changes from ions 
I suppose) so it'll be either fixed or removed as we cannot seriously 
ship things that are really broken.


Anne-Marie

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Bugsplashing

2012-06-04 Thread David Edmundson
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf
annemarie.mahf...@free.fr wrote:
 On 06/04/2012 11:41 AM, Thijs Heus wrote:

 On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:


  2) Are the components useful? I could see a lot of use for grouping
  bugs,
  and trying to keep a component bug free. But again - only when it is in
  use. And what is the difference between e.g. containment-desktop and
  desktop?

 i think components are fine, maybe there could be a couple more but thise
 are
 fine. in this particular case containment-desktop means strictly what
 happens
 in the desktop background area, while desktop is the plasma desktop shell
 application, the actual executable that creates desktops, panels etc. yeah
 i
 know, jargon :/

 OK, clear. If there is one place where jargon is allowed, it is BKO, as long
 as it is being used consistently. I guess there has been a fair amount of
 mix up there, but I'll check.

  3) There is a fair amount of bugs that need to be treated with the
  authority and wisdom of a developer. I can be almost certain that a bug
  is
  a wont fix, but only a dev can mark it as such. I could keep a list of
  such
  bugs, and throw them over this mailing list once in a while, or perhaps
  a
  flag for_devs could work here. This would not be meant as a kicking
  devs
  to fix a bug, but should only take 2 minutes of time to comment/check
  out/close/whatever.

 something that would be very useful i think is a day of irc meeting with
 you
 guys to do this kind of not immediately obvious prioritization and maybe
 with
 people taking tasks for actually fixing the ones with more priority.

 next weeks are quite thehorror (talking at least for me and probably
 aaron) we
 could manage to do something in the second half of june a bit before
 akademy
 perhaps?


 I'll try and keep a list of bugs to check. When life allows it, I lazily am
 around at irc, so if anyone is bored ;)
 A (minor) bugdays would be useful, but in the case of late June I would
 combine oldbug-compression with the beta-polishing and a focus on the latest
 bugs and regressions. Other than that, there is no real urgency for me - as
 long as we can work our way to a reliable (and short) buglist.

 Thijs

 Some bugs need to be fixed before 4.9 is out: for example the Weather
 Station applet does not display anything anymore (API changes from ions I
 suppose) so it'll be either fixed or removed as we cannot seriously ship
 things that are really broken.

 Anne-Marie


The official KDE Quality team bug day is next weekend. 9th/10th. It
will be mentioned in the KDE beta announcement.

There is a full checklist of things to go through on the new QML
plasmoids, and that is the part I'm leading.  One of the items is to
go through and remove any now-invalid bugs, which should hopefully
help these efforts.

David Edmundson


 ___
 Plasma-devel mailing list
 Plasma-devel@kde.org
 https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Bugsplashing

2012-06-04 Thread Thijs Heus


 The official KDE Quality team bug day is next weekend. 9th/10th. It
 will be mentioned in the KDE beta announcement.

 There is a full checklist of things to go through on the new QML
 plasmoids, and that is the part I'm leading.  One of the items is to
 go through and remove any now-invalid bugs, which should hopefully
 help these efforts.

 David Edmundson


Cool, will be there, just setup the 4.9 virtual box. But the  focus at bug
day is a bit different, I guess: I'd argue I'd like to go for checking all
the bugs that I can reproduce in 4.8 against 4.9, rather than deflating the
backlog of older bugs.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Bugsplashing

2012-06-03 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 02 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
 Hello Plasma-devvers,
 
 Myriams actions at bugs.kde.org stirred my email box last week, and
 actually got me to do plasma bug triaging myself again. It is awesome to
 see that the number of bug reports for plasma is now less than half of what
 it was 180 days ago. With plasma and kwin down so much in bugcount, we can
 boast a desktop that starts to approach rock steady again -with the numbers
 to prove it.

this effort has been very, very, appreciated

 Anyway, my usual hobby is to a) make sure that new bugs are checked for
 dupes and reproducability as far as I can, and b) go through the old end of
 the database and see what bugs are still valid. Currently there are about
 150 open reports without comment in the past half year, and that should go
 down to close to zero. Now I have a few questions:
 1) Do you guys care? The entire exercise only makes sense if the devs want
 to use BKO the way Martin wrote it in his blogs.
 2) Are the components useful? I could see a lot of use for grouping bugs,
 and trying to keep a component bug free. But again - only when it is in
 use. And what is the difference between e.g. containment-desktop and
 desktop?

i think components are fine, maybe there could be a couple more but thise are 
fine. in this particular case containment-desktop means strictly what happens 
in the desktop background area, while desktop is the plasma desktop shell 
application, the actual executable that creates desktops, panels etc. yeah i 
know, jargon :/

 3) There is a fair amount of bugs that need to be treated with the
 authority and wisdom of a developer. I can be almost certain that a bug is
 a wont fix, but only a dev can mark it as such. I could keep a list of such
 bugs, and throw them over this mailing list once in a while, or perhaps a
 flag for_devs could work here. This would not be meant as a kicking devs
 to fix a bug, but should only take 2 minutes of time to comment/check
 out/close/whatever.

something that would be very useful i think is a day of irc meeting with you 
guys to do this kind of not immediately obvious prioritization and maybe with 
people taking tasks for actually fixing the ones with more priority.

next weeks are quite thehorror (talking at least for me and probably aaron) we 
could manage to do something in the second half of june a bit before akademy 
perhaps?

Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Bugsplashing

2012-06-02 Thread Thijs Heus
Hello Plasma-devvers,

Myriams actions at bugs.kde.org stirred my email box last week, and
actually got me to do plasma bug triaging myself again. It is awesome to
see that the number of bug reports for plasma is now less than half of what
it was 180 days ago. With plasma and kwin down so much in bugcount, we can
boast a desktop that starts to approach rock steady again -with the numbers
to prove it.

Anyway, my usual hobby is to a) make sure that new bugs are checked for
dupes and reproducability as far as I can, and b) go through the old end of
the database and see what bugs are still valid. Currently there are about
150 open reports without comment in the past half year, and that should go
down to close to zero. Now I have a few questions:
1) Do you guys care? The entire exercise only makes sense if the devs want
to use BKO the way Martin wrote it in his blogs.
2) Are the components useful? I could see a lot of use for grouping bugs,
and trying to keep a component bug free. But again - only when it is in
use. And what is the difference between e.g. containment-desktop and
desktop?
3) There is a fair amount of bugs that need to be treated with the
authority and wisdom of a developer. I can be almost certain that a bug is
a wont fix, but only a dev can mark it as such. I could keep a list of such
bugs, and throw them over this mailing list once in a while, or perhaps a
flag for_devs could work here. This would not be meant as a kicking devs
to fix a bug, but should only take 2 minutes of time to comment/check
out/close/whatever.

Cheers,

Thijs
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel