Re: QtQuick 1.0 vs 1.1
Martin Gräßlin wrote: > I am more for dependency on 4.7.4, but it has to be clarified with the > release team and probably packagers. Till 4.8 is released all distros > should ship it and all packaging systems should support it. So it's > hopefully just a >= 4.7.4 instead of >=4.7.0 From the Fedora side, absolutely no objections to depending on >= 4.7.4, in fact we'd appreciate it if it means fewer bugs. All our supported releases (i.e. Fedora 14 and newer) have at least 4.7.4 in updates already. In fact, as far as we're concerned, you could even require >= 4.8.0. Fedora 16 ships Qt 4.8 RC and we aren't planning to ship KDE SC 4.8 to Fedora 15 (and Fedora 14 will be dead by that time). But 4.7.4 is definitely no problem. Kevin Kofler ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: QtQuick 1.0 vs 1.1
On Monday 14 November 2011 22:00:32 Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > I just seen a little problem in the series of components we have and the way > we use qml... > for some things, QtQuick 1.1 is required, especially for > implicitWidth/implicitHeight (poor brother of size hints, but makes things > way better already) > and LayoutMirroring, to decently support rtl layouts. > > now, seems the import qtquick 1.1 was introduced only in Qt 4.7.4, making > effectively a feature upgrade in a Qt bugfix release (bad precedent to say > the least) > > so now for releasing components in kde 4.8 we should either depend from qt > 4.7.4, that is quite nasty because it never happened or actually downgrade > everywhere in the components the use of qtquick 1.1 to 1.0. > > i have a giant patch here that does just that, doesn't seem to cause many > problems, everything will just be slightly more buggy until that will be > reverted as soon as we can depend from Qt 4.8 > > so, what of the two poisons? ;) I am more for dependency on 4.7.4, but it has to be clarified with the release team and probably packagers. Till 4.8 is released all distros should ship it and all packaging systems should support it. So it's hopefully just a >= 4.7.4 instead of >=4.7.0 Cheers Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
QtQuick 1.0 vs 1.1
Hi all, I just seen a little problem in the series of components we have and the way we use qml... for some things, QtQuick 1.1 is required, especially for implicitWidth/implicitHeight (poor brother of size hints, but makes things way better already) and LayoutMirroring, to decently support rtl layouts. now, seems the import qtquick 1.1 was introduced only in Qt 4.7.4, making effectively a feature upgrade in a Qt bugfix release (bad precedent to say the least) so now for releasing components in kde 4.8 we should either depend from qt 4.7.4, that is quite nasty because it never happened or actually downgrade everywhere in the components the use of qtquick 1.1 to 1.0. i have a giant patch here that does just that, doesn't seem to cause many problems, everything will just be slightly more buggy until that will be reverted as soon as we can depend from Qt 4.8 so, what of the two poisons? ;) Cheers, Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
