Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of
plasmoids?
if
not, let's start on on community.kde.org.
yes, it's a great idea and no, there still doesn is a page for it, if
you will do one.. free hugs :p
I scored one: http://techbase.kde.org/QML_Plasmoids ! :P
I've listed plasmoids that are in
kde-workspace/plasma/{desktop,generic}/applets. I guess those are the
primary ones.
Marco: Please update as soon as possible.
Thanks for the good work.
Also important are those in kdeplasma-addons (most of the ones in the
playground svn are those)
i'll mark the ones that are started, and should really really start
porting them over git, meh
while people start to do the ports, i think the branches where they
live should be marked here near the plasmoid name
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 22:27:42 Viranch Mehta wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of
plasmoids? if
not, let's start on on community.kde.org.
yes, it's a great idea and no, there still doesn is a page for it, if
you will do one.. free hugs :p
I scored one: http://techbase.kde.org/QML_Plasmoids ! :P
This page should be moved to community.kde.org, and certainly not be in
techbase's top level.
I've put its content here:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/PlasmoidScripting#Porting_Plasmoids_to_QML
I've listed plasmoids that are in
kde-workspace/plasma/{desktop,generic}/applets. I guess those are the
primary ones.
Marco: Please update as soon as possible.
Cheers,
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: i'll mark the ones that are started, and should really really start porting them over git, meh while people start to do the ports, i think the branches where they live should be marked here near the plasmoid name Please get the repository ready as soon as possible, so that I can start submitting few patches to the QML plasmoids to get familiar. Or can I go ahead with SVN playground for now? Thanks, Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: i'll mark the ones that are started, and should really really start porting them over git, meh while people start to do the ports, i think the branches where they live should be marked here near the plasmoid name Please get the repository ready as soon as possible, so that I can start submitting few patches to the QML plasmoids to get familiar. Or can I go ahead with SVN playground for now? i honestly don't know when i'll be able to do that, so if you want to work on svn please go ahead ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? if not, let's start on on community.kde.org. This'd be a good idea! Cheers, Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? if not, let's start on on community.kde.org. yes, it's a great idea and no, there still doesn is a page for it, if you will do one.. free hugs :p Cheers, Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids?
if
not, let's start on on community.kde.org.
yes, it's a great idea and no, there still doesn is a page for it, if
you will do one.. free hugs :p
I scored one: http://techbase.kde.org/QML_Plasmoids ! :P
I've listed plasmoids that are in
kde-workspace/plasma/{desktop,generic}/applets. I guess those are the
primary ones.
Marco: Please update as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Viranch
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote: Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the porting? But the ones which are in progress are possibly the ones which get done, anyway. I don't think it's a good idea to put a GSoC student onto something people are already working on. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote: On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote: Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the porting? But the ones which are in progress are possibly the ones which get done, anyway. I don't think it's a good idea to put a GSoC student onto something people are already working on. I think I can look through some on-going work and possibly write some patches for getting familiar. Another question: All the QML plasmoids are currently in playground, right? Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings, which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in yours. cheers On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Viranch Mehta viranch.me...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote: On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote: Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the porting? But the ones which are in progress are possibly the ones which get done, anyway. I don't think it's a good idea to put a GSoC student onto something people are already working on. I think I can look through some on-going work and possibly write some patches for getting familiar. Another question: All the QML plasmoids are currently in playground, right? Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Hayri Bakici theha...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings, which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in yours. Well, the plasmoids are already existent, so use cases are pretty much defined and well-known by user. So I don't think that's required here. Thanks for the comments, btw :) Cheers, Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: Attached is the first draft of my GSoC proposal for the project: QMLify the KDE Plasma Widgets. Please review it and send me comments/suggestions. one thing i'd suggest is priortizing and annotating the list of target plasmoids. some are more difficult than others. i'd suggest starting with the simpler ones first so that if you get stuck on something more complex we'll at least get the easier plasmoids done as part of the GSoC project. this will also give you the opportunity to slowly ramp up your QML skills by starting with easier projects and working your way up the slope to more complex ones. the other important issue is that some are already started, and so may need to just be finished out. Marco has made a lot of progress on a system tray replacement, for instance. Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? if not, let's start on on community.kde.org. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the porting? -Todd ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Re: GSoC proposal: First draft
On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: Attached is the first draft of my GSoC proposal for the project: QMLify the KDE Plasma Widgets. Please review it and send me comments/suggestions. one thing i'd suggest is priortizing and annotating the list of target plasmoids. some are more difficult than others. i'd suggest starting with the simpler ones first so that if you get stuck on something more complex we'll at least get the easier plasmoids done as part of the GSoC project. this will also give you the opportunity to slowly ramp up your QML skills by starting with easier projects and working your way up the slope to more complex ones. the other important issue is that some are already started, and so may need to just be finished out. Marco has made a lot of progress on a system tray replacement, for instance. Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? if not, let's start on on community.kde.org. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
