Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread David Edmundson
Is there some central overview of the screpped and to-be-restored
functionality lost in Plasma 5?

If it's on bugzilla and marked as confirmed, it means we're going to do it.

If it's on bugzilla and marked as invalid/wontfix it means we're not going
to do it

If it's on bugzilla and marked as unconfirmed, then we collectively suck.

David
​
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
Hi,

first of all, things like these belong directly into https://bugs.kde.org 
instead of on the ML because here things like that tend to be forgotten under 
the pile of mails that arrive daily.

- Icon-only task manager has no option to open new instances via middle
click. Shift-click has been just implemented, though

There's been a bit of discussion about what middle click should to, it has 
been agreed iirc that middle click will close the application to be consistent 
with all the other tabs (browsers, file manager, ...). Shift+Click will be the 
new launch new instance shortcut. There's also a bit of investigation going on 
to enable keyboard shortcuts such as Meta+1 for the first item in tray, Meta+2 
for the second, etc.

- No simple launcher plasmoid for one application. do i really have to
make a directory with a .desktop file and use a directory-view workspace
for this? (Scratched my own itch and created a to-be-released steam
plasmoid for my usecase!)

There is the icon plasmoid? Just drag an application onto the desktop and it 
will create a simple single icon for it.

Cheers,
Kai Uwe

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 07 November 2014 13:05:25 David Edmundson wrote:

 If it's on bugzilla and marked as unconfirmed, then we collectively suck.

And most important (just as a general reminder even tough that's not the case 
now),  if is *not* on bugzilla, it's going to be forgotten, so always make 
sure to report there the issues (other channels such as irc and mailinglists 
do a terrible job at issue tracking)

-- 
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Philipp A.
2014-11-07 13:05 GMT+01:00 David Edmundson da...@davidedmundson.co.uk:

 If it's on bugzilla and marked as confirmed, it means we're going to do it.

 If it's on bugzilla and marked as invalid/wontfix it means we're not going
 to do it

 If it's on bugzilla and marked as unconfirmed, then we collectively suck.


hmm, if that’s the case, the widget porters should have filed those when
releasing their ports.

nobody knows better than them what they left out, and now it’s up to the
users to find and report them :/

other stuff is simply a design question: per-activity settings were
something implemented per individual KCM. are they being centralized or are
they simply gone? people who know such things could post them in e.g.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340652 to make us suck less.


2014-11-07 13:24 GMT+01:00 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:

 And most important (just as a general reminder even tough that's not the
 case
 now),  if is *not* on bugzilla, it's going to be forgotten, so always make
 sure to report there the issues (other channels such as irc and
 mailinglists
 do a terrible job at issue tracking)

2014-11-07 13:21 GMT+01:00 Kai Uwe Broulik k...@privat.broulik.de:

 first of all, things like these belong directly into https://bugs.kde.org
 instead of on the ML because here things like that tend to be forgotten
 under the pile of mails that arrive daily.


people, seriously?

you might notice that i posted a bugzilla link for everything but one item.
why do you feel the need to tell *me* (who obviously has done his homework)
that knee-jerk response even if it doesn’t apply to me?


 Icon-only task manager has no option to open new instances via middle click.
 Shift-click has been just implemented, though


 There's been a bit of discussion about what middle click should to, it has
 been agreed iirc that middle click will close the application to be
 consistent with all the other tabs (browsers, file manager, ...).
 Shift+Click will be the new launch new instance shortcut. There's also a
 bit of investigation going on to enable keyboard shortcuts such as Meta+1
 for the first item in tray, Meta+2 for the second, etc.


yeah. when i tried it, it wasn’t implemented, so naturally i yearned for
the thing i was used to: middle click. shift-click is more consistent, but
i use the task bar more often to start new instances than to close them.

well, i’ll have to live with having to use two hands for that now.


 No simple launcher plasmoid for one application.


 There is the icon plasmoid? Just drag an application onto the desktop and
 it will create a simple single icon for it.


oh! so intuitive for everyone but people who spent too much time with the
taskbar to try new things (this isn’t meant sarcastically, i really like it
☺)

i bet i’d have discovered that if it wasn’t KDE but something i don’t use
daily

Best, Philipp
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Eike Hein



On 11/07/2014 01:38 PM, Philipp A. wrote:

people, seriously?

you might notice that i posted a bugzilla link for everything but one
item. why do you feel the need to tell /me/ (who obviously has done his
homework) that knee-jerk response even if it doesn’t apply to me?


No, you misunderstand - the reason you're getting a negative
response here is in part *because* you're raising things on
the ML that have already been discussed on the bug tracker,
which (a) means that it's a retread for some of the people
involved, which can be annoying and (b) makes some people
feel like you're ignoring those discussions and disrespecting
the opinions raised in them and trying to get your way via
another venue.

Now ... that's not always a bad thing, some situations do
call for persistence and escalating things to a different
venue. Ruffled feathers side, good things sometimes come out
of it. But it means having to expect that kind of pushback.

This is a very ordinary push-pull interaction, so nobody
should get too heated here please.




yeah. when i tried it, it wasn’t implemented, so naturally i yearned for
the thing i was used to: middle click. shift-click is more consistent,
but i use the task bar more often to start new instances than to close them.


I made the same argument in the discussion:

[Monday, November 03, 2014] [02:02:38 PM] Sho_ Here's the thing, based 
on the earlier convo I was going to put new instances on Shift-Click and 
Close on middle-click (to match browser tab bars). But middle-click is a 
lot more convenient than shift-click, and while close has other ways to 
accomplish it (window button, keyboard shortcut), starting new instances 
doesn't really. So maybe the convenient middle-click and starting new 
instances should go together after all ...
[Monday, November 03, 2014] [02:02:51 PM] Sho_ But if we use 
middle-click for close elsewhere it's still inconsistent of course


So I'm receptive to the argument, and still mulling it. I
implemented Shift-Click for now because it's non-conflicted
and could be done independently of how middle-click may or
may not be treated in the future.




oh! so intuitive for everyone but people who spent too much time with
the taskbar to try new things (this isn’t meant sarcastically, i really
like it ☺)


Note that if you use the Application Menu (Kicker) plasmoid as
your launcher menu, the context menu for apps in there also has
an Add to Desktop action (which is smart enough to spawn an
Icon plasmoid on Desktop, and do a symlink on Folder).


Cheers,
Eike
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Ivan Čukić

 hmm, if that’s the case, the widget porters should have filed those when
 releasing their ports.

Not really, when implementing a new plasmoid version (most of the time, it is 
mostly about rewriting than porting), you don't actually know every little 
thing that the old one does. Not even if you are the one who originally 
developed it since other people added features, and all that happened 5+ years 
ago.

So, yes, it is up to the users to realize what is missing for them, and 
report.

Cheers,
Ivan


-- 
KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/
gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Regressions in Plasma 5

2014-11-07 Thread Philipp A.
2014-11-07 14:04 GMT+01:00 Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org:

 Not really, when implementing a new plasmoid version (most of the time, it
 is mostly about rewriting than porting), you don't actually know every
 little thing that the old one does.


good point. i thought that complex stuff like the taskbar is analyzed
before reimplementing/porting it.


2014-11-07 13:59 GMT+01:00 Eike Hein h...@kde.org:

 you're raising things on the ML that have already been discussed on the
 bug tracker, which […] makes some people feel like you're ignoring those
 discussions and disrespecting the opinions raised in them and trying to get
 your way via another venue.


that was not at all my intention :|


 Now ... that's not always a bad thing, some situations do call for
 persistence and escalating things to a different venue. Ruffled feathers
 side, good things sometimes come out of it.


 This is a very ordinary push-pull interaction, so nobody should get too
 heated here please.


i’m calm, and thanks for explaining why people did this!

my intention was based on the assumption that there’s some kind of porting
plan, an analysis of what to port with which features, or the porters
having this plan at least in their heads.


 yeah. when i tried it, it wasn’t implemented, so naturally i yearned for
 the thing i was used to: middle click. shift-click is more consistent, but
 i use the task bar more often to start new instances than to close them.


 I made the same argument in the discussion […] so I'm receptive to the
 argument, and still mulling it. I implemented Shift-Click for now because
 it's non-conflicted and could be done independently of how middle-click may
 or may not be treated in the future.


maybe simply use a setting just like in the old icon tasks plasmoid.

oh! so intuitive for everyone but people who spent too much time with the
 taskbar to try new things (this isn’t meant sarcastically, i really like it
 ☺)


 Note that if you use the Application Menu (Kicker) plasmoid as your
 launcher menu, the context menu for apps in there also has an Add to
 Desktop action (which is smart enough to spawn an Icon plasmoid on
 Desktop, and do a symlink on Folder).


maybe we could add some more discoverability, though. android and web apps
often have a small guide popups explaining features like this:

[image: https://github.com/amlcurran/ShowcaseView]
https://github.com/amlcurran/ShowcaseView
×
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel