Re: licensing terms of plasma dictionary runner

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

I'm fine with GPL-2.0-or-later, if that's fine with you. Otherwise let
me know and I'll pick a different one.

Thanks for getting in touch, and sorry for the delay.

Jason

Re: licensing terms of plasma dictionary runner

[Harald Sitter]

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:28 PM Jason A. Donenfeld  wrote:
>
> I'm fine with GPL-2.0-or-later, if that's fine with you. Otherwise let
> me know and I'll pick a different one.

GPL-2.0-or-later is perfect, I'll update the files.

> Thanks for getting in touch, and sorry for the delay.

No worries.

Thank you
HS

Re: licensing terms of plasma dictionary runner

[Harald Sitter]

I guess this got buried in the inbox. Try #2 :)

|
|
v

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:11 AM Harald Sitter  wrote:
>
> Hey Jason!
>
> Hope you are doing well.
> I've just noticed that the dictionary runner you've made for Plasma
> doesn't really have licensing terms in its source files.
>
> https://cgit.kde.org/kdeplasma-addons.git/tree/runners/dictionary/dictionaryrunner.cpp
>
> It'd be really grand if you could specify which terms apply so we can
> fix up the headers accordingly.
>
> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy
>
> Thanks!
> HS

licensing terms of plasma dictionary runner

[Harald Sitter]

Hey Jason!

Hope you are doing well.
I've just noticed that the dictionary runner you've made for Plasma
doesn't really have licensing terms in its source files.

https://cgit.kde.org/kdeplasma-addons.git/tree/runners/dictionary/dictionaryrunner.cpp

It'd be really grand if you could specify which terms apply so we can
fix up the headers accordingly.

https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy

Thanks!
HS