On Fri 8. of July 2005 18:34, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Friday 08 July 2005 19:17, twittner wrote: > > +Version: 2005.07.08 > > +Release: 0.1 > > +License: BSD > uh! such versioning just begs for epoch bump afterwards! > I can't imagine such situation (but I'm not brilliant ;) - version is taken from date '+%Y.%m.%d' . Please, provide an example when bumping epoch is necessary - show me output from:
rpmvercmp YYYY.MM.DD-relX yyyy.mm.dd-relY -- Tomasz Wittner _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
