cvs vs svn reloaded

2005-09-13 Thread Paweł Sakowski 
In the spirit of don't take my word for it I've created a
proof-of-concept of how an svn-based, package-oriented repository would
look like.

http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/cvs2svn-migration/trunk

Requires a (partial) mirror of the repo. Have fun creating brand new PLD
repositories and invoking the brand new builder to build rpms from it.
Feedback most welcome.

-- 
Paweł Sakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLD Linux Distribution

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: cvs2svn-migration/trunk/README

2005-09-13 Thread Paweł Sikora 
Dnia wtorek, 13 września 2005 19:45, Paweł Sakowski napisał:
 On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:26 +0200, pluto wrote:
  +- For clarity we should keep the $package/{$package.spec,tags,branches}
  +  instead of {trunk,tags,branches}/$package.

 Rather $package/{trunk,{tag,branche}s/foo}/$package.spec. Making trunk a
 superdirectory of the rest would make cross-branch merges very painful.

yes, you're right.

-- 
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil
  is for good men to do nothing.
   - Edmund Burke
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en