Re: AC: TODO list
Tomasz Wittner wrote: > ecasound.spec Searching for tag auto-ac-ecasound-2_4_3-2... Tag auto-ac-ecasound-2_4_3-2 already exists (spec release: 1.90). Jest juz na ftp. Czyli cos nie tak z tym STBR... -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 19:34, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > No nie. Instalacja ruby na srcbuilderze to juz by byla przesada. This is english list. > > sh: ruby: not found > error: line 36: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = > Error: package build failed. (no more info) > exit status 1280 I'm treating ruby in the same way as perl/python, so ruby+ruby-modules is now installed on srcbuilder. Anyway fixing macros to return ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR is the way to go. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
No nie. Instalacja ruby na srcbuilderze to juz by byla przesada. sh: ruby: not found error: line 36: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Error: package build failed. (no more info) exit status 1280 -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Dnia 31-12-2005, sob o godzinie 16:33 +0100, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki napisał(a): > Dnia 30-12-2005, pią o godzinie 12:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz > napisał(a): > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > Current TODO list, based on i686: > > > > Update: > > > bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config >= 0.3.2 not found > > bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config >= 0.3.2 not found > > Te dwa raczej nie były u nas zbudowane dotąd. To pakiety, które > sportowałem z RedHata jako zależności Anacondy. Przy aktualizacji > anaconda.spec zajmę się też nimi (widziałem, że xf86config się nie > buduje na jednej arch). > > Anaconda jest planowana dopiero na Th. Wrong list, sorry about that. -- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux signature.asc Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Dnia 30-12-2005, pią o godzinie 12:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a): > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Current TODO list, based on i686: > > Update: > bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config >= 0.3.2 not found > bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config >= 0.3.2 not found Te dwa raczej nie były u nas zbudowane dotąd. To pakiety, które sportowałem z RedHata jako zależności Anacondy. Przy aktualizacji anaconda.spec zajmę się też nimi (widziałem, że xf86config się nie buduje na jednej arch). Anaconda jest planowana dopiero na Th. -- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux signature.asc Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ruby packages (was Re: AC: TODO list)
On Sat 31. of December 2005 14:47, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Saturday 31 December 2005 15:07, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs > > -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 2>&1 > > [...] > > > sh: ruby: not found > > error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = > > Begin-PLD-Builder-Info > > Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) > > fixed that. note that for the rpm macros to output something sane, > ruby-modules package needs to be installed, as the rbconfig is otherwise > not available. maybe move rbconfig to main ruby package? On the one hand for this purpose I've moved directory skeleton from ruby-modules to ruby package (I thought rather about 3rd party modules) and I've add %ruby_ver_requires_eq in addition to %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq. # cp /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux/rbconfig.rb . # rpm -ev ruby-modules --nodeps # install -m644 -D rbconfig.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux/rbconfig.rb # rpm -E '%ruby_version' 1.8 It seems that rbconfig doesn't depend on any others modules. But, on the other hand, additional ~6MB (ruby-modules) on builder doesn't hurt too much and is needed f.e. for generating documentation - most of ruby packages use rdoc for this purpose and rdoc depends on ruby-modules. So you gain no big profit from moving rbconfig to ruby package - BR and R ruby-modules are needed allmost for every ruby package (even I've such assumption - I'm not going to check every ruby package). So, do as you wish (I'm not convinced of it). > > $ poldek -e ruby > $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq > Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR > > $ poldek -u ruby > $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq > Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR Nice. > > $ poldek -u ruby-modules > $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq > Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8 > > btw, why not creating rpm-rubyprov package? i think the deps can be > produced same way as php/perl are. > > i guess (by brief looking as i don't know the language) pattern > like /require\s+'([^']+)';/ should do it. there's include yet, maybe sth else (I don't know ruby too - I've just started reading some tutorials and the like). Here is disscusion about this: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2003-January/msg00092.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2003-January/msg00096.html -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
ruby packages (was Re: AC: TODO list)
On Saturday 31 December 2005 15:07, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs > -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 2>&1 [...] > sh: ruby: not found > error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = > Begin-PLD-Builder-Info > Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) fixed that. note that for the rpm macros to output something sane, ruby-modules package needs to be installed, as the rbconfig is otherwise not available. maybe move rbconfig to main ruby package? $ poldek -e ruby $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR $ poldek -u ruby $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR $ poldek -u ruby-modules $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8 btw, why not creating rpm-rubyprov package? i think the deps can be produced same way as php/perl are. i guess (by brief looking as i don't know the language) pattern like /require\s+'([^']+)';/ should do it. -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 14:07, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs > -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 2>&1 > > U rake.spec > # $Revision: 1.20 $, $Date: 2005/12/31 10:36:33 $ > Searching for tag auto-ac---... > sh: ruby: not found > error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = > Error: package build failed. (no more info) > exit status 1280 > error: No files produced. > sh: ruby: not found > error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = > Begin-PLD-Builder-Info > Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) I see - rpm-build-macros-1.277 is installed whereas ruby-modules not. Please, install ruby-modules on src builder. -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: raggle.spec - Ho Ho Ho, Meeerrryyy Raggle 0.4.4!
On Sat 31. of December 2005 13:08, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Sat Dec 31 12:08:09 2005 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - Ho Ho Ho, Meeerrryyy Raggle 0.4.4! [...] Not so merry (due to lack of ruby-modules on src builder) - the same with rake: ERRORS: raggle.spec From: PLD ac-src builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat Dec 31 13:08:20 2005 raggle.spec (HEAD): FAILED --- raggle.spec:HEAD: Build-Time: user:0.62s sys:0.30s real:3.60s (faults io:84 non-io:27283) *** buildlog for raggle.spec request from: glen started at: Sat Dec 31 13:08:16 2005 building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt raggle.spec 2>&1 U raggle.spec # $Revision: 1.14 $, $Date: 2005/12/31 12:08:03 $ Searching for tag auto-ac---... sh: ruby: not found error: line 16: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Building target platforms: noarch Building for target noarch Error: package build failed. (no more info) exit status 1280 error: No files produced. sh: ruby: not found error: line 16: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:0.62s sys:0.30s real:3.60s (faults io:84 non-io:27283) End-PLD-Builder-Info -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 14:35, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > But spec needs to be parseable. Undefined macros at the beginning of > line in preamble break it. also equality is used, there must be a value. ie this will also break: Requires: something = afaik few kernel packages suffered this problem. -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 21:52:31 +0100, Jarosław Kamper wrote: > > What about pl fonts in pdf files (viewed in acroread) generated from > > ps2pdf from gs > 7.07 (-afpl,-gpl,-esp,-whatever)? > > Works for me. > > ~: rpm -q ghostscript > ghostscript-8.51-2 > > my ps files are generated from LaTeX. So - is ghostscript-esp-8.15.1 (from HEAD) OK for Ac? (-afpl could be added too, but -afpl cannot be the only ghostscript in distro because of free licensing for non-commercial purposes only) -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: > And STBR mc - rel 3 has broken editor (doesn't display characters as > said by LC_CTYPE because of broken utf patch enabled). or not. there's ac-branch present, but it looks like work was done on HEAD. Anyone can drop AC-Branch? -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: > And STBR mc - rel 3 has broken editor (doesn't display characters as > said by LC_CTYPE because of broken utf patch enabled). sent -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 2>&1 U rake.spec # $Revision: 1.20 $, $Date: 2005/12/31 10:36:33 $ Searching for tag auto-ac---... sh: ruby: not found error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Error: package build failed. (no more info) exit status 1280 error: No files produced. sh: ruby: not found error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
And STBR mc - rel 3 has broken editor (doesn't display characters as said by LC_CTYPE because of broken utf patch enabled). -- GoTaR gotar>http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:45:51PM +0100, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Sat 31. of December 2005 12:17, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:26, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
> > > > upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
> >
> > .. and in this case (and similar) produces broken srpms by exapanding
> > %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} to nothing?
> It seems that I'm wrong - src.rpm keeps original spec and doesn't perform
> macros expansion.
But spec needs to be parseable. Undefined macros at the beginning of
line in preamble break it.
--
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:06:45PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > bd: php-pecl-esmtp-0.3.1-3: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch I've emailed author about this. He'll have a look at it after New Year. -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 12:17, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:26, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
[...]
> > > Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
> > > upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
>
> .. and in this case (and similar) produces broken srpms by exapanding
> %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} to nothing?
It seems that I'm wrong - src.rpm keeps original spec and doesn't perform
macros expansion.
>
> > .. and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of
> > broken ftp indexes. So two solutions:
> > - fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
> > - wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
>
> IMO the latter one is correct.
Please, send to builders sth small - rake.spec f.e. I wonder what's happened
(IMO everything should be OK).
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:26, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
> > > On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > > > On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > > > > one more problem (ecasound.spec):
> > > > >
> > > > > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
> > >
> > > chicken-egg problem
> > > use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
> >
> > Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
> > upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
... and in this case (and similar) produces broken srpms by exapanding
%{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} to nothing?
>
> .. and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of broken
> ftp indexes. So two solutions:
> - fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
> - wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
IMO the latter one is correct.
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:15, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > > one more problem (ecasound.spec):
> > >
> > > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
>
> chicken-egg problem
> use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
>
> > $ rpm -E '%ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq'
> > Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8
> >
> > rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.277 provides this macro and is placed as
> > BuildRequires.
>
> build requires can't be satisfied if .spec is not parseable...
Thanks a lot.
[...]
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
>
> Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > > On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > > > one more problem (ecasound.spec):
> > > >
> > > > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
> > chicken-egg problem
> > use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
>
> Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
> upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
... and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of broken
ftp indexes. So two solutions:
- fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
- wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
--
===
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
>
> On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > > one more problem (ecasound.spec):
> > >
> > > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
> chicken-egg problem
> use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
--
===
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > one more problem (ecasound.spec):
> >
> > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
chicken-egg problem
use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
> $ rpm -E '%ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq'
> Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8
>
> rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.277 provides this macro and is placed as
> BuildRequires.
build requires can't be satisfied if .spec is not parseable...
> On my computer everything works OK. I'm using:
> $ q rpm rpm-build-macros
> rpm-0:4.4.2-26
> rpm-build-macros-0:1.277-1
>
> > Error: package build failed. (no more info)
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > one more problem (ecasound.spec): > > error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq $ rpm -E '%ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq' Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8 rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.277 provides this macro and is placed as BuildRequires. On my computer everything works OK. I'm using: $ q rpm rpm-build-macros rpm-0:4.4.2-26 rpm-build-macros-0:1.277-1 > Error: package build failed. (no more info) -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
one more problem (ecasound.spec): error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Error: package build failed. (no more info) -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 09:28, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > Tomasz Wittner wrote: > > On Fri 30. of December 2005 12:06, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > > Current TODO list, based on i686: > > > > > > Update: > > > > [...] > > > > > bd: ruby-ecasound-2.4.3-2: req ruby = 1:1.8.2 version mismatch > > > > Again: please rebuild (from HEAD) ruby and ruby dependent packages. List > > of specs is herewith. > > > > ruby.spec > > --- ruby.spec:HEAD: > upgrading packages > package upgrade failed Probably bugus message - buildlog shows: ruby-1.8.4-4: equal version installed, skipped Nothing to do Please check ruby version installed on builders: rpm -q ruby ruby-devel ruby-modules ruby-ecasound Maybe removing ruby-ecasound is necessary? > > Is there any point to rebuild the rest? > > > cvsspam.spec > > ecasound.spec > > [...] -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Tomasz Wittner wrote: > On Fri 30. of December 2005 12:06, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > Current TODO list, based on i686: > > > > Update: > [...] > > bd: ruby-ecasound-2.4.3-2: req ruby = 1:1.8.2 version mismatch > Again: please rebuild (from HEAD) ruby and ruby dependent packages. List of > specs is herewith. > > ruby.spec --- ruby.spec:HEAD: upgrading packages package upgrade failed Is there any point to rebuild the rest? > cvsspam.spec > ecasound.spec [...] -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
