Re: rpm changelog
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:05 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that you always need complete changelog? But we don't build any rpms from subversion? but while we were discussing migration to svn it was stated that we really need complete changelog. always. i'm lazy to search the conversation, but wasn't it about the changelog in spec files, ie that svn can't provide changelog into spec files like cvs does. yep. you are right. sorry for misinformation. wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RPM changelog
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote: in binary rpm's. why pointless? Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me. [14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l 1423 Assuming every package has 10 KB worth of changelog, then we're talking about 14 MB of almost never used, slowing rpm down, taking disk space crap. That's a lot of difference to me. changelog isn't compressed, and some small packages have more in changelog in Small packages usually doesn't have big changelogs. That assumption is just plain wrong. wolf -- Bartek . - W każdym porządnym domu powinien być fortepian. A wiecie po Taudul :co? Żeby na nim postawić palmę. .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RPM changelog
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote: [14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l 1423 So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_ So? I said it makes difference _for me_. wolf -- Bartek . - O! Jest ten co wypisuje o mnie bzdury. Taudul : .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RPM changelog
So? I said it makes difference _for me_. Please read between lines... It makes no difference for me == I don't care == (you may completly remove changelogs from rpms || you may keep 10MB changelog in each rpm) EOT M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: RPM changelog
Bartosz Taudul wrote: On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote: [14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l 1423 So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_ So? I said it makes difference _for me_. So, if we are talking about personal preferences, I prefer no changelog at all than a changelog without the information about the most important changes. -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
