Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kdebase.spec - -ksysguardd.patch included in br...

2006-10-28 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:19:11PM +0200, glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Fri Oct 27 13:19:11 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: AC-branch
>  Log message:
> - -ksysguardd.patch included in branch diff

When you merged HEAD (adding branch diff) this patch didn't exist in the
KDE repo. There is no notice of the later updates in spec changelog.

I suggest that person updating branch diff should also bump the release
of the spec (also on the AC-branch, if it uses that diff).

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po górach SSIE!!!
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kdebase.spec - -ksysguardd.patch included in br...

2006-10-28 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Saturday 28 October 2006 10:17, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:

> I suggest that person updating branch diff should also bump the release
> of the spec (also on the AC-branch, if it uses that diff).
On HEAD branch.diff is updated frequently but release is bumped only if it 
goes to builders. Don't know what's the rule for AC-branch.

-- 
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kdebase.spec - -ksysguardd.patch included in br...

2006-10-28 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 10:17, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> 
> > I suggest that person updating branch diff should also bump the release
> > of the spec (also on the AC-branch, if it uses that diff).
> On HEAD branch.diff is updated frequently but release is bumped only if it 
> goes to builders. Don't know what's the rule for AC-branch.

In such case situations like recent "kdebase-ksysguardd.patch" will be
hard to avoid.

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po górach SSIE!!!
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


mono in Ac - 1.1.18?

2006-10-28 Thread Jakub Bogusz
Currently Ac contains vulnerable version of mono, which should be
updated.
There is available 1.1.13.8.1 mainteance release, but there is also new
1.1.18 release, which restores alpha architecture support (lost after
1.0.6 when mint became unusable).

Is 1.1.18 OK for Ac?


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en