[SPEC] python-decorator - up to 2.3.1

2008-10-12 Thread Lukasz Kies 
Dear All,

In attachment I send a patch to python-decorator.spec on HEAD. Changes:
- up to 2.3.1
- correct python-devel version in BR
- add CHANGES.txt to docs

Please someone with RW access to CVS add it and send STBR as
python-decorator is missing on ftps.
Thank you.

Regards,
Lukasz Kies


python-decorator.spec
Description: Binary data
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: gksu.spec - findlang commented out

2008-10-12 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 
On Sunday 12 October 2008 23:03, shadzik wrote:
 Author: shadzik  Date: Sun Oct 12 20:03:45 2008 GMT
 Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
  Log message:
 - findlang commented out
...
 @@ -83,12 +83,13 @@

  rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0/*.la

 -%find_lang %{name}
 +#%find_lang %{name}
macro is still expanded, however as it's expanded in shell context, it's 
commented out for shell...

-- 
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: gksu.spec - findlang commented out

2008-10-12 Thread Tomasz Wittner 
On Sunday 12 of October 2008, 23:09, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
 On Sunday 12 October 2008 23:03, shadzik wrote:
  Author: shadzik  Date: Sun Oct 12 20:03:45 2008 GMT
  Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
   Log message:
  - findlang commented out

 ...

  @@ -83,12 +83,13 @@
 
   rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0/*.la
 
  -%find_lang %{name}
  +#%find_lang %{name}

 macro is still expanded, however as it's expanded in shell context, it's
 commented out for shell...

... and why have you removed %find_lang - it should be mentioned in your 
commitlog.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: privoxy.spec - up to 3.0.10 - not defined %_docdir issue

2008-10-12 Thread Tomasz Wittner 
On Sunday 12 of October 2008, 19:15, twittner wrote:
 Author: twittner Date: Sun Oct 12 17:15:39 2008 GMT
 Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
[...]
 - rel. 0.1 - rpm -E '%_docdir' shows that this macro is not defined
1. Ditto:
$ rpm -E '%_docdir'
%_docdir

$ q rpm-build-macros
rpm-build-macros-0:1.478-1 noarch th-x86-64.pld-linux.org
What should be fixed?

2. Why %doc macro puts documentation files 
in /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} directory instead 
of /usr/share/doc/%{name} ?
What we gain by adding -%{version} to directory name? (my answer: nothing but 
unnecessary troubles).Many programs expects that their documentation is 
located 
in /usr/share/doc/%{name} - privoxy, fluid from fltk-devel are good examples.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en