Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac > > bcond in xulrunner.spec? > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some > simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple > things. one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is going to clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line? wrobell ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac > > > bcond in xulrunner.spec? > > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some > > simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple > > things. > > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is going to > clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line? you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it... -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: texlive.spec - %files fixes
2008/12/21 Elan Ruusamäe : > On Sunday 21 December 2008, uzsolt wrote: >> +# %postun fonts-bh >> +# %texhash > > for the zillionth time: to disable macro expansion use %% So should I use %%postun fonts-bh ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: texlive.spec - %files fixes
On Monday 22 December 2008 17:35, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > 2008/12/21 Elan Ruusamäe : > > On Sunday 21 December 2008, uzsolt wrote: > >> +# %postun fonts-bh > >> +# %texhash > > > > for the zillionth time: to disable macro expansion use %% > > So should I use > %%postun fonts-bh no, # %%postun but if you disable %files, it's irrelevant anyway as package is not written -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac > > > > bcond in xulrunner.spec? > > > > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some > > > simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple > > > things. > > > > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is going to > > clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line? > > you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it... to be honest, that's too optymistic statement. but... will you? best regards, wrobell ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it... Jokes go to fortunes CVS module, not here. wolf -- Bartek . Taudul : .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
