Re: packages: util-vserver/util-vserver.spec, util-vserver/TODO (NEW) - move TO...
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 13:44:38 blues wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.225 2009/05/13 10:44:33 blues +- move TODO to separate file why? i liked the otherwise it's 1. in spec file, always around when you edit the file 3. nobody really goes to see what is in TODO, maybe i'm bored and i fix something. 2. PLD-doc/make-todo.sh scanned SPECS for TODO sections 4. if there are lots of SOURCES in package (like php for example), catching eye on TODO in `ls` is unlikely. -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: util-vserver/util-vserver.spec, util-vserver/TODO (NEW) - move TO...
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 13:44:38 blues wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.225 2009/05/13 10:44:33 blues +- move TODO to separate file why? i liked the otherwise it's 1. in spec file, always around when you edit the file 3. nobody really goes to see what is in TODO, maybe i'm bored and i fix something. 2. PLD-doc/make-todo.sh scanned SPECS for TODO sections 4. if there are lots of SOURCES in package (like php for example), catching eye on TODO in `ls` is unlikely. Because: - it makes only noise in spec - nobody goes to see TODO in spec too :) - it's clean and nice - TODO can be not only for SPEC - TODO can be vry long... - you don't have to catch anything - you know it's there, like spec :D I think it's better way, easier to parse. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Fwd: packages (rpm-4_5): rpm/rpm-shescape-memfault.patch (NEW) - doing xrealloc ...
___ pld-cvs-commit mailing list pld-cvs-com...@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit why there are no more cvsweb links at the end of commit mails? -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
verify rpm package contents
How to verify digest of files in rpm package (like when repackaged modified files)? For example I've got: ~: rpm -qplv xorg-proto-xproto-devel-7.0.14-1.i586.rpm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 167477 Oct 28 2008 /usr/include/X11/keysymdef.h but after un-cpio there is:167401 May 22 2008 rpm --verify -p file.rpm verifies against filesystem contents not files within. -- Tomasz Pala go...@pld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: verify rpm package contents
On May 13, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Tomasz Pala wrote: How to verify digest of files in rpm package (like when repackaged modified files)? For example I've got: ~: rpm -qplv xorg-proto-xproto-devel-7.0.14-1.i586.rpm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 167477 Oct 28 2008 /usr/ include/X11/keysymdef.h but after un-cpio there is:167401 May 22 2008 rpm --verify -p file.rpm verifies against filesystem contents not files within. Repackaged files have no digest verification. The digest carried in repackaged packages is the original digest; but the file in the payload may have been modified or even deleted and not present in te repackaged package payload. You can work around by using a transaction probe dependency. E.g. mkdir -p /etc/rpm/sysinfo md5sum /etc/passwd | sed -e 's/\([^ ]*\) *\(.*\)/digest(\2) = \1/' /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Requirename verifies the md5 of /etc/passwd every time rpm -Uvh is run. hth 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: util-vserver/util-vserver.spec, util-vserver/TODO (NEW) - move TO...
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:53:38PM +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 13:44:38 blues wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.225 2009/05/13 10:44:33 blues +- move TODO to separate file why? i liked the otherwise it's 1. in spec file, always around when you edit the file 3. nobody really goes to see what is in TODO, maybe i'm bored and i fix something. 2. PLD-doc/make-todo.sh scanned SPECS for TODO sections 4. if there are lots of SOURCES in package (like php for example), catching eye on TODO in `ls` is unlikely. Because: - it makes only noise in spec not true, because they are usually short - nobody goes to see TODO in spec too :) it is easy to spot todo in spec, imho - it's clean and nice - TODO can be not only for SPEC so what? it is about the package not spec - TODO can be vry long... any examples... even if there is one or two, then usually they are short if i reckon well wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
