Re: packages: awesome/awesome.spec - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009, uzsolt wrote: Author: uzsolt Date: Mon Jun 8 17:53:52 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0 This dependency was auto-generated. Please revert. -- Regards, Paweł Zuzelski ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: awesome/awesome.spec - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0
Author: uzsolt Date: Mon Jun 8 17:53:52 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0 This dependency was auto-generated. Please revert. Imho no. I've installed awesome yesterday, but the startup-notification stayed the 0.9.x, didn't installed the 0.10.0, and because of this, the awesome didn't worked (missed a function). Try it: remove awesome, downgrade startup-notification to 0.9.x, install awesome. Zsolt ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: awesome/awesome.spec - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Zsolt Udvari wrote: Author: uzsolt Date: Mon Jun 8 17:53:52 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - requires startup-notificiation = 0.10.0 This dependency was auto-generated. Please revert. Imho no. I've installed awesome yesterday, but the startup-notification stayed the 0.9.x, didn't installed the 0.10.0, and because of this, the awesome didn't worked (missed a function). Try it: remove awesome, downgrade startup-notification to 0.9.x, install awesome. ekhm... ok. You are right. auto-generated dependency is libstartup-notification-1.so.0 and it's not enough because SONAME has not changed. -- Paweł ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: mythtv/mythtv.spec - moved from DEVEL to HEAD branch - up to rece...
On Monday 25 May 2009 02:41:52 WK wrote: Wiadomość od Elan Ruusamäe: and where exactly did you report it at all so it would get fixed? or you expect out of nowhere the macro being fixed? Exactly nowhere. sooo? what have you done now to get the bug fixed? -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
