Re: openswan.spec up to 2.6.28

2010-08-19 Thread Marcin Rybak
2010/8/18 Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org

 You might look at the following messages and consider if either of
 these should get packaged, particularly the index.html file under
 docs? Or is this a duplication of docs in another format? Just
 something to consider in the future.

 -
 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
 /home/users/caleb/tmp/openswan-2.6.28-root-caleb
 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/share/doc/openswan/index.html
   /usr/share/doc/openswan/ipsec.conf-sample
 -


index.html is old FreeS/WAN documentation index (connected with rest of html
files) last updated: 2003/04/15 19:18:15, may be usefull, because almost
nothing has changed :)

---
Marcin Rybak
http://marcinrybak.com
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: transmission.spec up to 2.04

2010-08-19 Thread Paweł Zuzelski
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Marcin Rybak wrote:

 Updated to 2.04 (tickets closed by this release:
 https://trac.transmissionbt.com/query?milestone=2.04group=componentgroupdesc=1order=severity),
 builds and works at current Ti

Thanks for contribution. But please, send unified diffs, not the
whole files. I.e. send the output of:

cvs diff -u

or

diff -u file.old file

diffs are easier to review.

-- 
Regards,
Paweł
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en