Re: w32codec updated

2012-08-15 Thread Lord Blick 

W odpowiedzi na wiadomość z dnia 15.08.2012 01:40, od Bartosz Taudul:

Propozycja jest następująca: rupcia dupcia salcesonik heloł beloł w dupę słonik.
I think that your both emotional expressions and reactions are not 
controlled by yourself, so limited confidence is, as the best, on the place.

--
Best Regards,
Lord Blick


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

texlive 2012

2012-08-15 Thread Artur Wroblewski 
Hi,

What is the status of TexLive 2011 in the repo at the moment?

Does it work at least a bit?

TexLive 2012 is out - anything against to skip 2011 and move to 2012 directly?

Regards,

w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: texlive 2012

2012-08-15 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 
On Wednesday 15 of August 2012, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What is the status of TexLive 2011 in the repo at the moment?
> 
> Does it work at least a bit?

It partially works. I wasn't able to build other packages documentation using 
texlive 2011 for example (we were once close to having texlive 2011 in Th but 
had to revert).

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: texlive 2012

2012-08-15 Thread Jan Rękorajski 
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Artur Wroblewski wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> What is the status of TexLive 2011 in the repo at the moment?
> 
> Does it work at least a bit?
> 
> TexLive 2012 is out - anything against to skip 2011 and move to 2012 directly?

Go ahead, there's no point in sticking to older version.
Just don't send it to ftp before september :)

-- 
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsmimuw.edu.pl
bagginspld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en