Re: [packages/xorg-xserver-server] P: xorg-driver-video-modesetting, xorg-driver-video

2016-11-24 Thread Jan Palus
On 24.11.2016 07:23, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > Suggests is no longer there, but anyway I assume you don't want xserver
> > to provide video driver even though it provides video driver (so user
> > can select some other one). I don't really care so if there are no
> > objections I will replace Provides with Suggests tomorrow.
> 
> Well, modesetting works on any KMS hardware, so I would go with dropping 
> entire virtual xorg-driver-video thing from all drivers.

Except it might provide sluggish performance even in 2D like on many
NVIDIA chips which still lack reclocking in nouveau. I guess it could be
a valid reason to give user a choice of proprietary driver.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: [packages/xorg-xserver-server] P: xorg-driver-video-modesetting, xorg-driver-video

2016-11-24 Thread Jacek Konieczny

On 2016-11-23 23:12, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:

On 23.11.2016 17:16, atler wrote:

  # Usual desktop setups need least one video driver to run, see
xorg.log which one exactly
  Suggests:xorg-driver-video
+Provides:xorg-driver-video
+Provides:xorg-driver-video-modesetting


nono no, do not provide "xorg-driver-video"!

it's virtual package indicating "any video driver"


But in some cases (like newer Intel cards) the 
xorg-driver-video-modesetting, included in the server package, is the 
best driver one can use. xorg-driver-video-intel is not really 
maintained any more and doesn't work properly with Skylake chips.


Jacek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en