Re: [packages/mozo] noarch package

2020-10-18 Thread Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en 
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:

> On 10/18/20 1:37 PM, atler wrote:
> 
> >   Obsoletes:mate-menu-editor
> > +%{?noarchpackage}
> >   BuildRoot:%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
> 
> well. here's what you go it wrong. for main package noarch should be 
> always written out.
> 
> and therefore perhaps the macro should be renamed to noarchsubpackage to 
> prevent mis-use.

Why do we have this macro in the first place?

It's only needed for ancient rpm 4.4. We should just get rid of it and
stop doing this.

-- 
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

th-i686 builder dead?

2020-10-18 Thread Jakub Bogusz 
It doesn't report builds, neither via mail nor queue.html.


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: [packages/mozo] noarch package

2020-10-18 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 

On 10/18/20 1:37 PM, atler wrote:


  Obsoletes:mate-menu-editor
+%{?noarchpackage}
  BuildRoot:%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)


well. here's what you go it wrong. for main package noarch should be 
always written out.


and therefore perhaps the macro should be renamed to noarchsubpackage to 
prevent mis-use.


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en