Re: rpm4 on carme*
On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> any issues.
* poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not
(that concerns mainly /usr/lib/.build-id subdirs)
* rpm.org is missing %{__ln} macro. spotted only single occurrence in
xrdp.spec
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [th-ad...@pld-linux.org: [all] builder queue problem]
W dniu 06.11.2020 o 16:46, Jakub Bogusz pisze: > Who is able to fix it? https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26401 workaround in rsync added and installed on buildlogs. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[th-ad...@pld-linux.org: [all] builder queue problem]
Who is able to fix it? - Forwarded message from PLD all builder - From: PLD all builder X-PLD-Builder: all To: th-ad...@pld-linux.org, jpa...@fastmail.com, qbo...@pld-linux.org, ar...@pld-linux.org, g...@pld-linux.org Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 15:44:09 + Subject: [all] builder queue problem there were problems sending files from queue /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs: problems: [src: /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs/th-i686.6e721a93-e258-4b58-b9f7-f7ed931b29ef.openjdk11.spec.log] sending incremental file list rsync: [generator] failed to set permissions on "/openjdk11,6e721a93-e258-4b58-b9f7-f7ed931b29ef.bz2" (in pld-buildlogs-th-i686): Operation not supported (95) sent 124 bytes received 186 bytes 206.67 bytes/sec total size is 116,001 speedup is 374.20 rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1330) [sender=3.2.3] [src: /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs/th-i686.C180FFC5-F623-4893-A2C5-FF510AC06FF3.alien.spec.log] sending incremental file list th-i686.C180FFC5-F623-4893-A2C5-FF510AC06FF3.alien.spec.log rsync: [receiver] failed to set permissions on "/.alien,C180FFC5-F623-4893-A2C5-FF510AC06FF3.bz2.HgbMHo" (in pld-buildlogs-th-i686): Operation not supported (95) sent 3,171 bytes received 209 bytes 2,253.33 bytes/sec total size is 3,007 speedup is 0.89 rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1330) [sender=3.2.3] [src: /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs/th-i686.26e08e9b-4ddf-466a-8181-babe17566b88.percona-server.spec.log] [...] - End forwarded message - -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:38:16PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On 24.10.2020 19:30, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > > > > >TBH lua packaging in PLD is a mess. I'm going to drasticly simplify it > > >by gradually getting rid of all versioned luaXX packages. > > > > > > another sign of the mess: > > > > ??? rpm -q --what-provides lua-devel > > > > lua50-devel-5.0.3-5.x86_64 > > lua51-devel-5.1.5-6.x86_64 > > lua54-devel-5.4.1-2.x86_64 > > Uh, my fault with missing %if ... %endif clauses in recent changes in > lua40.spec and lua51.spec (in which I wanted to drop lua-devel > provides). Fixed in lua40-4.0.1-13. lua51.spec was already OK (since lua51-5.1.5-7). lua50.spec also provides lua-devel only when built with default_lua, but this package was not present in Th. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.10.2020 19:30, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: > > >TBH lua packaging in PLD is a mess. I'm going to drasticly simplify it > >by gradually getting rid of all versioned luaXX packages. > > > another sign of the mess: > > ??? rpm -q --what-provides lua-devel > > lua50-devel-5.0.3-5.x86_64 > lua51-devel-5.1.5-6.x86_64 > lua54-devel-5.4.1-2.x86_64 Uh, my fault with missing %if ... %endif clauses in recent changes in lua40.spec and lua51.spec (in which I wanted to drop lua-devel provides). -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: build logs missing
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > build logs appear to be missing. last entry 7 days ago > > > - > http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org//index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=neovim&id=975831a2-5126-44fc-aaa9-ff309f1ccd60&action=tail > > - > http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org//index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&ns=&cnt=50&off=0 Probably related to tons of "builder queue problem" emails with content like: | there were problems sending files from queue | /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs: | problems: | [src: | /home/users/builderth/pld-builder.new/spool/buildlogs/th-i686.6e721a93-e258-4b58-b9f7-f7ed931b29ef.openjdk11.spec.log] | | sending incremental file list | rsync: [generator] failed to set permissions on | "/openjdk11,6e721a93-e258-4b58-b9f7-f7ed931b29ef.bz2" (in | pld-buildlogs-th-i686): Operation not supported (95) -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: rpm4 on carme*
On 28.10.2020 00:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote: All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report any issues. --blink option is gone. the option was useful to tell what was previous version installed of the same package. $ rpm -q libvterm --blink rpm: --blink: unknown option ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su
On 24.10.2020 19:30, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: TBH lua packaging in PLD is a mess. I'm going to drasticly simplify it by gradually getting rid of all versioned luaXX packages. also packaging should add lua-x.y.pc pkgconfig path, so would not need to maintain patches in projects like this: -LUA_INCLUDE := $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags lua-$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN) 2>/dev/null || echo "-I/usr/include/lua$(LUA_VER -LUA_LIB := $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs lua-$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN) 2>/dev/null || echo "-llua$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN)") +LUA_INCLUDE := $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags lua$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN) 2>/dev/null || echo "-I/usr/include/lua$(LUA_VERS +LUA_LIB := $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) --libs lua$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN) 2>/dev/null || echo "-llua$(LUA_VERSION_MAJ_MIN)") INCLUDES = $(LUA_INCLUDE) ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su
On 24.10.2020 19:30, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: TBH lua packaging in PLD is a mess. I'm going to drasticly simplify it by gradually getting rid of all versioned luaXX packages. this makes litle sense what is now, seems only 5.1 is present and it's assumed as a default version: $ rpm -qpl lua-lpeg-0.12.2-1.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/lpeg.so /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/lpeg.so.0.12.2 /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2 /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2/HISTORY.gz /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2/lpeg-128.gif /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2/lpeg.html /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2/re.html /usr/share/doc/lua-lpeg-0.12.2/test.lua.gz /usr/share/lua/5.1/re.lua the packages should be versioned with lua version, or only one version be included in distro. also, there's luajit, which is (i think) same language level as lua 5.3. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm/rpm.org] - drop lua hacks and look for default lua version - don't obsolete rpm-getdeps, this rpm does not su
On 24.10.2020 19:30, Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en wrote: TBH lua packaging in PLD is a mess. I'm going to drasticly simplify it by gradually getting rid of all versioned luaXX packages. another sign of the mess: ➔ rpm -q --what-provides lua-devel lua50-devel-5.0.3-5.x86_64 lua51-devel-5.1.5-6.x86_64 lua54-devel-5.4.1-2.x86_64 ➔ could we have template-specs/lua.spec which documents current style lua packages be written? 1. lua-devel >= 5.1 2. lua51-devel 3. pkgconfig(lua) >= 5.1 4. ... ? ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
build logs missing
build logs appear to be missing. last entry 7 days ago - http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org//index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=neovim&id=975831a2-5126-44fc-aaa9-ff309f1ccd60&action=tail - http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org//index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&ns=&cnt=50&off=0 ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
