Re: glibc <> libselinux dep loop
Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 11.10.2016 08:42, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On 11.10.2016 06:44, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:11AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > >>> proposition to move it to subpackage. > >>> > >>> question: by what name? what else to include in it? > >>> > >>> i think it's the tool used to make /var/db files that used to be in > >>> 'db' > >>> package... > >> AFAIK it's used with nss_db - so maybe separate %package -n nss_db > >> (libnss_db*, makedb)? > >> > >> > > ok, WIP on nss_db branch > > > > but to ensure safe upgrade must R: it from glibc? R: from basesystem? > > > > i personally do not use nss_db, so i'm not scared if it becames lost > > in system upgrade. imho it was stupid to include optional component in > > base glibc in first place. > > > oh, and we already have nss_db in th. to be dropped? > > root@distrib ~# rpm -Uhv --test > /srv/pld/th/PLD/x86_64/RPMS/nss_db-2.2.3-0.pre1.11.x86_64.rpm > Preparing... ### [100%] > error: Install/Erase problems: > file /lib64/libnss_db.so.2 from install of > nss_db-2.2.3-0.pre1.11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > glibc-2.24-3.x86_64 > file /usr/bin/makedb from install of > nss_db-2.2.3-0.pre1.11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > glibc-2.24-3.x86_64 > file /var/db/Makefile from install of > nss_db-2.2.3-0.pre1.11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > glibc-2.24-3.x86_64 nss_db-2.2.3-0.pre1.11 + nss_updatedb-10-3 (LDAP backend) works for me for many years, while nss_db from glibc segfaults. Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: nss_db/nss_db.spec - remove db from nss config on package removal...
glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Thu Feb 9 22:59:22 2012 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - remove db from nss config on package removal, Why do you think you know better than admin what should be in his configs? like nss_myhostname not my fantasy $Log: nss_myhostname.spec,v $ Revision 1.2 2011/11/01 21:07:57 glen Revision 1.1 2011/11/01 21:04:58 glen Some other glen? Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: nagios/nagios.spec - bcond embeded perl chsanged. [OOC] Glen nauc...
Patryk Zawadzki wrote: W dniu 7 lutego 2012 14:26 użytkownik Bartosz Taudul wolf@gmail.com napisał: 2012/2/7 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz ar...@maven.pl: Please stop this personal crap. Better share with us about what is the actuall problem with this bcond? I cannot tell that from reading your commit logs. Jakbyś nie odpierdalał personal crapu z abw, to by sobie glen mógł przeczytać o co chodzi. IRC to nie bugtracker. Ależ glen siedzi na ircu, tylko po tej dobrej, oficjalnej[*] stronie. Więc miał potencjalną szansę by się dowiedzieć. Tylko cenzura go odcięła. [*] - to ta, na której jak mówi strona pld siedzi many developers and users, ale rozmowy prowadzi tylko CIA w przestrzeń i co jakiś czas jakiś człowiek do siebie. Całe prawdziwe życie i tak dzieje się na IRCnecie. Tak FYI. Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: kernel for PLD AC
Marcin Rybak wrote: 2012/1/30 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org On 30.01.2012 09:52, Marcin Rybak wrote: Thanks for answer, but 3.0.18 is not buildable at AC at all: error: Failed build dependencies: i didn't say BUILDING, i said INSTALLING :) not exacly works, as expected :) kernel panic: http://i.imgur.com/frgK2.jpg Such new kernel in AnCient system? A little naive. AFAIR 2.6.25 was last working in Ac with md. Ac is dead, random upgrades doesn't change that. Kill zombie! Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: rpm-build-macros/rpm.macros - dont overwrite %__cmake, %__scons, ...
Elan Ruusamäe wrote: -%__cmake /usr/bin/cmake ??? now the macros are undefined!? vim +31 rpm-build-macros/rpm.macros what's the purpose? Parallel build via scons, cmake etc, as make do. Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - alt_kernel fixes from LINUX_2_6_16 - use o...
Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008 23:21, Zbyniu Krzystolik wrote:
Author: glen Date: Fri Nov 21 11:59:26 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: LINUX_2_6
Log message:
- alt_kernel fixes from LINUX_2_6_16
- use own builddir
%prep
-%setup -q -n linux-%{basever}
+%setup -qc
+cd linux-%{basever}
What is this for? Another unnessesary troublesome change in kernel.spec.
Why this spec is so special? Do you want to change next thousands
packages where builddir != %name-%version?
-1 from me.
tell directly you don't like me, why bring kernel into play!?
No, I don't care who is touching kernel.spec, only what is changing.
Zbyniu
--
%% Absolutely nothing we trust %%
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - alt_kernel fixes from LINUX_2_6_16 - use o...
glen rada była zauważyć:
Author: glen Date: Fri Nov 21 11:59:26 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: LINUX_2_6
Log message:
- alt_kernel fixes from LINUX_2_6_16
- use own builddir
%prep
-%setup -q -n linux-%{basever}
+%setup -qc
+cd linux-%{basever}
What is this for? Another unnessesary troublesome change in kernel.spec.
Why this spec is so special? Do you want to change next thousands
packages where builddir != %name-%version?
-1 from me.
Zbyniu
--
%% Absolutely nothing we trust %%
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Mniej wiecej Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:59:27AM +0300, zainteresowany Elan Ruusamäe rzekl: err? why wiki marks email came from @pld-linux.org while it's not neccessary valid user? - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: User unknown) [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ grep grizz CVSROOT/users [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ No such developer. Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [OT] Packaging .py files
Mniej wiecej Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, zainteresowany Mariusz Mazur rzekl: Dnia czwartek, 17 lipca 2008, Tomasz Pala napisał: These 'perfectly working apps' used to be security holes, functionality breakers etc. If they in fact are, to the extent we're not as much of security zealots as, say, openbsd, it's obviously better to patch them. http://tinyurl.com/6cxdjw Are you sure? ;) Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - use underscore in kernel release for KABI ...
Mniej wiecej Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:17:20AM +0200, zainteresowany glen rzekl:
Author: glen Date: Thu Jul 3 09:17:20 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: LINUX_2_6
Log message:
- use underscore in kernel release for KABI to be a lit less misleading
-%define kernel_release
%{version}%{?_alt_kernel:%{_alt_kernel}}-%{_localversion}
+%define kernel_release
%{version}%{?_alt_kernel:%{_alt_kernel}}_%{KABI}
What for? You are changing package name that exist since always and it
is less misleading?
Zbyniu
--
%% Absolutely nothing we trust %%
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: proftpd.spec - proper bconds support
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:07:50PM +0200, Przemek Iskra wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:01:08PM +0200, Zbyniu Krzystolik wrote: Mniej wiecej Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:50:43PM +0300, zainteresowany Elan Ruusamäe rzekl: ^ the modules are in subpackages and dlopen()'ed, so the deps are just build time. so why bother with bconds? I don't care, it was broken, so I repair it. Ask glen - he made most changes recently ;-P ^^ h. Was it a joke and I didn't understand it ? Yes, look at tongue ;) Anyway, the first line should be in english on this list. True. Zbyniu -- %% Absolutely nothing we trust %% ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
