Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payloadw9.lzdio +%_binary_payloadw9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? Counting Mandriva backports: rpm-4.4.2.3 (though its a bloody mess in MES5) If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm2cpio.sh | cpio -dim Guaranteed to upgrade and not particularly hard. 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with gzdio payload. If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payloadw9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with gzdio payload. The back port isn't impossibly hard. but you want to start with ~rpm-5.1.4 iirc. If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version. Shipping *.src.rpm with anything except ZLIB compression is asking for incompatibilities. Using rpm2cpio (or rpm2cpio.sh) to unpack a *.src.rpm and rebuilding with compression du jour is the proper upgrade path. Meanwhile LZMA - XZ transition got smeared out for years and isn't an RPM issue per se. 73 de Jeff -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with gzdio payload. The back port isn't impossibly hard. but you want to start with ~rpm-5.1.4 iirc. IMO it's a waste of time to backport something to a software that will be obsolete real soon now (rpm4 in this case). If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version. Shipping *.src.rpm with anything except ZLIB compression is asking for incompatibilities. We are shipping binary (*.ARCH.rpm) rpm packages with rpm using ZLIB, so it should be always possible to install new rpm. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Shipping *.src.rpm with anything except ZLIB compression is asking for incompatibilities. We are shipping binary (*.ARCH.rpm) rpm packages with rpm using ZLIB, so it should be always possible to install new rpm. Good: zlib (as used @rpm5.org) is --rsyncable (and afaik LZMA/XZ is not). If both the remote/local packages are --rsyncable, then you SHOULD see larger bandwidth reductions than available with XZ compression and no --rsyncable afaik. The savings is a difficult measurement however, harder than just comparing file sizes. 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with gzdio payload. If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version. But rpm.rpm requires also some library rpms, e.g.: - db5.3 is something new in Th - xz 5.1.x (5.0.x dated few months ago won't satisfy) -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On 09/12/2012 07:49 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: %_source_payloadw9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio ... Shipping *.src.rpm with anything except ZLIB compression is asking for incompatibilities. src.rpm is not touched, it's still w9.gzdio -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote: commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200 - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) %_source_payload w9.gzdio -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that supports lzdio)? None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with gzdio payload. If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path. rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version. But rpm.rpm requires also some library rpms, e.g.: - db5.3 is something new in Th - xz 5.1.x (5.0.x dated few months ago won't satisfy) Good point, I'll revert that change then. As there is no real difference between lzdio and xzdio that I can find, we can postpone the switch for later. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
