Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
one more problem (ecasound.spec):
error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
chicken-egg problem
use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
$ rpm -E '%ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq'
Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8
rpmbuild(macros) = 1.277 provides this macro and is placed as
BuildRequires.
build requires can't be satisfied if .spec is not parseable...
On my computer everything works OK. I'm using:
$ q rpm rpm-build-macros
rpm-0:4.4.2-26
rpm-build-macros-0:1.277-1
Error: package build failed. (no more info)
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
one more problem (ecasound.spec):
error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
chicken-egg problem
use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
... and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of broken
ftp indexes. So two solutions:
- fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
- wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
--
===
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:15, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
one more problem (ecasound.spec):
error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
chicken-egg problem
use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
$ rpm -E '%ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq'
Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8
rpmbuild(macros) = 1.277 provides this macro and is placed as
BuildRequires.
build requires can't be satisfied if .spec is not parseable...
Thanks a lot.
[...]
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:26, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 11:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
On Sat 31. of December 2005 10:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
one more problem (ecasound.spec):
error: line 36: Unknown tag: %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq
chicken-egg problem
use %{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} instead (like php-pecl*.spec do)
Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
... and in this case (and similar) produces broken srpms by exapanding
%{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} to nothing?
.. and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of broken
ftp indexes. So two solutions:
- fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
- wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
IMO the latter one is correct.
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 12:17, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
On Sat 31. of December 2005 11:26, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
[...]
Problem is that srcbuilder has old, small envinronmrnt which is not
upgraded. And it builds everything with --nodeps.
.. and in this case (and similar) produces broken srpms by exapanding
%{?ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq} to nothing?
It seems that I'm wrong - src.rpm keeps original spec and doesn't perform
macros expansion.
.. and rpm-build-macros cannot be upgraded at the moment because of
broken ftp indexes. So two solutions:
- fix it not to require newer macros to build src.rpm or
- wait for sb with knowledge of ftp automatics (I don't know it)
IMO the latter one is correct.
Please, send to builders sth small - rake.spec f.e. I wonder what's happened
(IMO everything should be OK).
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:06:45PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: php-pecl-esmtp-0.3.1-3: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch I've emailed author about this. He'll have a look at it after New Year. -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
And STBR mc - rel 3 has broken editor (doesn't display characters as said by LC_CTYPE because of broken utf patch enabled). -- GoTaR priv0.onet.pl-gotarhttp://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: And STBR mc - rel 3 has broken editor (doesn't display characters as said by LC_CTYPE because of broken utf patch enabled). or not. there's ac-branch present, but it looks like work was done on HEAD. Anyone can drop AC-Branch? -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 21:52:31 +0100, Jarosław Kamper wrote: What about pl fonts in pdf files (viewed in acroread) generated from ps2pdf from gs 7.07 (-afpl,-gpl,-esp,-whatever)? Works for me. ~: rpm -q ghostscript ghostscript-8.51-2 my ps files are generated from LaTeX. So - is ghostscript-esp-8.15.1 (from HEAD) OK for Ac? (-afpl could be added too, but -afpl cannot be the only ghostscript in distro because of free licensing for non-commercial purposes only) -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 14:35, Jakub Bogusz wrote: But spec needs to be parseable. Undefined macros at the beginning of line in preamble break it. also equality is used, there must be a value. ie this will also break: Requires: something = afaik few kernel packages suffered this problem. -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Sat 31. of December 2005 14:07, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 21 U rake.spec # $Revision: 1.20 $, $Date: 2005/12/31 10:36:33 $ Searching for tag auto-ac---... sh: ruby: not found error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Error: package build failed. (no more info) exit status 1280 error: No files produced. sh: ruby: not found error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) I see - rpm-build-macros-1.277 is installed whereas ruby-modules not. Please, install ruby-modules on src builder. -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ruby packages (was Re: AC: TODO list)
On Sat 31. of December 2005 14:47, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Saturday 31 December 2005 15:07, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: building SRPM using: cd rpm/SPECS; nice -n 10 ./builder -nu --nodeps -bs -r HEAD -Tp auto-ac- -tt rake.spec 21 [...] sh: ruby: not found error: line 15: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:0.59s sys:0.29s real:2.73s (faults io:84 non-io:27097) fixed that. note that for the rpm macros to output something sane, ruby-modules package needs to be installed, as the rbconfig is otherwise not available. maybe move rbconfig to main ruby package? On the one hand for this purpose I've moved directory skeleton from ruby-modules to ruby package (I thought rather about 3rd party modules) and I've add %ruby_ver_requires_eq in addition to %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq. # cp /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux/rbconfig.rb . # rpm -ev ruby-modules --nodeps # install -m644 -D rbconfig.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux/rbconfig.rb # rpm -E '%ruby_version' 1.8 It seems that rbconfig doesn't depend on any others modules. But, on the other hand, additional ~6MB (ruby-modules) on builder doesn't hurt too much and is needed f.e. for generating documentation - most of ruby packages use rdoc for this purpose and rdoc depends on ruby-modules. So you gain no big profit from moving rbconfig to ruby package - BR and R ruby-modules are needed allmost for every ruby package (even I've such assumption - I'm not going to check every ruby package). So, do as you wish (I'm not convinced of it). $ poldek -e ruby $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR $ poldek -u ruby $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR Nice. $ poldek -u ruby-modules $ rpm -E %ruby_mod_ver_requires_eq Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = 1.8 btw, why not creating rpm-rubyprov package? i think the deps can be produced same way as php/perl are. i guess (by brief looking as i don't know the language) pattern like /require\s+'([^']+)';/ should do it. there's include yet, maybe sth else (I don't know ruby too - I've just started reading some tutorials and the like). Here is disscusion about this: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2003-January/msg00092.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2003-January/msg00096.html -- Tomasz Wittner ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Dnia 30-12-2005, pią o godzinie 12:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a): On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: Update: bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found Te dwa raczej nie były u nas zbudowane dotąd. To pakiety, które sportowałem z RedHata jako zależności Anacondy. Przy aktualizacji anaconda.spec zajmę się też nimi (widziałem, że xf86config się nie buduje na jednej arch). Anaconda jest planowana dopiero na Th. -- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLD Linux signature.asc Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Dnia 31-12-2005, sob o godzinie 16:33 +0100, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki napisał(a): Dnia 30-12-2005, pią o godzinie 12:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a): On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: Update: bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found Te dwa raczej nie były u nas zbudowane dotąd. To pakiety, które sportowałem z RedHata jako zależności Anacondy. Przy aktualizacji anaconda.spec zajmę się też nimi (widziałem, że xf86config się nie buduje na jednej arch). Anaconda jest planowana dopiero na Th. Wrong list, sorry about that. -- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLD Linux signature.asc Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 19:34, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: No nie. Instalacja ruby na srcbuilderze to juz by byla przesada. This is english list. sh: ruby: not found error: line 36: Version required: Requires: ruby-modules(ver) = Error: package build failed. (no more info) exit status 1280 I'm treating ruby in the same way as perl/python, so ruby+ruby-modules is now installed on srcbuilder. Anyway fixing macros to return ruby-modules(ver) = ERROR is the way to go. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: Update: bd: lilypond-2.2.4-2: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp-gnome-1.0.10-4: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp2-gnome-2.5.91-3: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-netclient-devel-0.91.1-3: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-pxp-devel-1.1.6-4: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-xmlrpc = 0.1.0-6 not found - baggins, these are still there :) Some epoch problems? bd: php-pecl-domxml-0.1-0.20051104.1: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch - uhm, this one is going to be dropped bd: php-pecl-esmtp-0.3.1-3: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-xmltools-1.3.7-2: req python-4Suite not found bd: ruby-ecasound-2.4.3-2: req ruby = 1:1.8.2 version mismatch -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: ocaml-netclient-devel-0.91.1-3: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-pxp-devel-1.1.6-4: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-xmlrpc = 0.1.0-6 not found - baggins, these are still there :) Some epoch problems? Show me `rpm -q ocaml-net-netstring-devel ocaml-xmlrpc ocaml-xmlrpc-devel` from builders. Janek -- Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Friday 30 December 2005 12:39, Jan Rekorajski wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: ocaml-netclient-devel-0.91.1-3: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-pxp-devel-1.1.6-4: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-xmlrpc = 0.1.0-6 not found - baggins, these are still there :) Some epoch problems? Show me `rpm -q ocaml-net-netstring-devel ocaml-xmlrpc ocaml-xmlrpc-devel` from builders. Here: http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~buildsrc/queue.html Janek -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: lcdf-typetools-2.12-1: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found New version already in CVS, please STBR from HEAD. -- Maciej Witaszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Maciej Witaszek wrote: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: lcdf-typetools-2.12-1: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found New version already in CVS, please STBR from HEAD. sent -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:12:43PM +0100, Maciej Witaszek wrote: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: tetex-algorith-20050316-1: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-algorith-20050316-1: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch only need rebuild, please STBR Sent bd: tetex-foiltex-1-5: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-foiltex-1-5: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch done - new version was sent to devel-pl and waiting to add to CVS, after that please STBR Commited and sent, thanks. bd: tetex-revtex-3.1-3: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-revtex-3.1-3: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch only need rebuild, please STBR Sent -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: amarok-helix-1.3.7-2: req helix-core not found What's wrong with helixplayer-1.0.6-2? WARN: helixplayer-1.0.6-2 not built for archs: ['athlon', 'i386'] i386 is excluded. athlon test-build request sent. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: amarok-helix-1.3.7-2: req helix-core not found What's wrong with helixplayer-1.0.6-2? WARN: helixplayer-1.0.6-2 not built for archs: ['athlon', 'i386'] i386 is excluded. athlon test-build request sent. Fails due to /proc/cpuinfo access restrictions. (another thing is that it shouldn't access this file during build...) -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wed 28. of December 2005 18:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Current TODO list, based on i686:
[...]
bd: ruby-ecasound-2.4.3-2: req ruby = 1:1.8.2 version mismatch
- twittner
$ cvs log ecasound.spec | grep -q twittner || echo Absent
Absent
$
I don't know what's it for - simply, I've removed this.
Almost every ruby dependent package should require ruby-modules with
major version of ruby due to directory layout (and maybe for some others
reasons) - think of /usr/lib/ruby/{,site_ruby/}1.8 . I've already made
appropriate changes in ruby.spec, rpm-macros-build.spec and ruby dependent
specs - please, build ruby.spec and rpm-build-macros first, next ruby packages
which are already on ftp - poldek:/all-avail search -r ruby shows 42
packages.
--
Tomasz Wittner
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:50, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 19:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: what about the missing dirs report? poldek 0.20 gives pretty extensive report $ poldek --sn ac --verify=deps,conflicts,file-conflicts,file-orphans, file-missing-deps attached report of packages needing to fix locale dirs. ankry will fix? :) -- glen error: /usr/share/locale/C: orphaned directory from cups-1.1.23-4 error: /usr/share/locale/as: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, gail-1.8.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, gail-1.8.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/az_IR: orphaned directory from gtk+2-2.8.9-2 error: /usr/share/locale/az_IR/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from gtk+2-2.8.9-2 error: /usr/share/locale/bn_IN: orphaned directory from kudzu-1.2.9-1 error: /usr/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from kudzu-1.2.9-1 error: /usr/share/locale/chs: orphaned directory from gtklp-1.0d-1 error: /usr/share/locale/chs/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from gtklp-1.0d-1 error: /usr/share/locale/dv: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/dv/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/fr_BE: orphaned directory from bazaar-1.4.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/fr_BE/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from bazaar-1.4.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/gr: orphaned directory from BitTorrent-4.2.1-1, gpsdrive-2.09-2 error: /usr/share/locale/gr/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from BitTorrent-4.2.1-1, gpsdrive-2.09-2 error: /usr/share/locale/haw: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/haw/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/kok: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/kok/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/my: orphaned directory from gaim-1.5.0-2 error: /usr/share/locale/my/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from gaim-1.5.0-2 error: /usr/share/locale/nb_NO: orphaned directory from BitTorrent-4.2.1-1 error: /usr/share/locale/nb_NO/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from BitTorrent-4.2.1-1 error: /usr/share/locale/no: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/no/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/no_NO: orphaned directory from Xdialog-2.1.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/no_NO/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from Xdialog-2.1.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/no_NY: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/no_NY/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/ps: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from iso-codes-0.47-1 error: /usr/share/locale/pt_PT: orphaned directory from kmymoney2-0.6.4-1 error: /usr/share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from kmymoney2-0.6.4-1 error: /usr/share/locale/ru_RU: orphaned directory from cups-1.1.23-4 error: /usr/share/locale/sl_SI: orphaned directory from hal-0.5.4-4 error: /usr/share/locale/sl_SI/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from hal-0.5.4-4 error: /usr/share/locale/sv_SE: orphaned directory from Xdialog-2.1.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from Xdialog-2.1.2-2 error: /usr/share/locale/tk: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, dasher-3.2.18-1, eog-2.12.2-1, epiphany-1.8.2-1, file-roller-2.12.2-1, [13 packages left] error: /usr/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, dasher-3.2.18-1, eog-2.12.2-1, epiphany-1.8.2-1, file-roller-2.12.2-1, [13 packages left] error: /usr/share/locale/ug: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, bug-buddy-2.12.1-1, dasher-3.2.18-1, eel-2.12.2-1, eog-2.12.2-1, [13 packages left] error: /usr/share/locale/ug/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from atk-1.10.3-1, bug-buddy-2.12.1-1, dasher-3.2.18-1, eel-2.12.2-1, eog-2.12.2-1, [13 packages left] error: /usr/share/locale/uk_UA: orphaned directory from cups-1.1.23-4 error: /usr/share/locale/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: orphaned directory from gtk+2-2.8.9-2 error: /usr/share/locale/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from gtk+2-2.8.9-2 error: /usr/share/locale/yo: orphaned directory from gnome-desktop-2.12.2-1 error: /usr/share/locale/yo/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from gnome-desktop-2.12.2-1 error: /usr/share/locale/zh_TW.Big5: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 error: /usr/share/locale/zh_TW.Big5/LC_MESSAGES: orphaned directory from kbiff-3.8-1 ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:35, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: lilypond-2.2.4-2: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found lilypond sent to builders Will be ghostscript = 8.15 available in Ac, or some older lilypond needs to be AC-branched? Don't know - if you think that some ghostscripts packages areready then send them to builder. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:50, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 19:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: what about the missing dirs report? poldek 0.20 gives pretty extensive report $ poldek --sn ac --verify=deps,conflicts,file-conflicts,file-orphans, file-missing-deps attached report of packages needing to fix locale dirs. ankry will fix? :) I will look at it. -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
AC: TODO list
Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: amarok-helix-1.3.7-2: req helix-core not found bd: bigsister-oracle-0.99b2-3: req perl(DBD::Oracle) not found bd: bigsister-oracle-0.99b2-3: req perl-DBD-Oracle not found bd: lilypond-2.2.4-2: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp-gnome-1.0.10-4: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp2-gnome-2.5.91-3: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: kdeedu-kmessedwords-i18n-3.5.0-1: req kdeedu-kmessedwords = 8:3.5.0 not found - solved in cvs already bd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: req kernel-smp-sound-alsa = [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found bd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: req kernel-sound-alsa = [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found bd: lcdf-typetools-2.12-1: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found bd: libgdamm-1.3.7-1: req libgda-2.so.3 not found - anyone? bd: ocaml-netclient-devel-0.91.1-2: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-pxp-devel-1.1.6-3: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-5: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version mismatch bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-5: req ocaml-xmlrpc = 0.1.0-5 not found - baggins? bd: php-mmcache-2.4.6-7: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch bd: php-mmcache-TurckLoader-2.4.6-7: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch bd: php-pear-MDB2_Driver_fbsql-0.1.1-1: req php-fbsql not found bd: php-pear-MDB2_Driver_oci8-0.1.2-1: req php-oci8 not found bd: php-pecl-domxml-0.1-0.20051104.1: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch bd: php-pecl-esmtp-0.3.1-3: req php(modules_api) = 20031224 version mismatch - what we do with these? glen, adamg? bd: python-rhpl-0.176-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-rhpxl-0.4-1: req python-xf86config = 0.3.2 not found bd: python-xmltools-1.3.7-2: req python-4Suite not found bd: ruby-ecasound-2.4.3-2: req ruby = 1:1.8.2 version mismatch - twittner bd: slsc-0.2.3-9: req libslang.so.1 not found - I'm dropping this one bd: tetex-algorith-20050316-1: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-algorith-20050316-1: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-foiltex-1-5: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-foiltex-1-5: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-revtex-3.1-3: req tetex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch bd: tetex-revtex-3.1-3: req tetex-latex = 1:2.0.2 version mismatch - anyone? Thanks! -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:21:18 +0100 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp-gnome-1.0.10-4: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp2-gnome-2.5.91-3: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch and who is the brave one to fight with athlon builder? bd: libgdamm-1.3.7-1: req libgda-2.so.3 not found - anyone? cvs libgdamm is not ready for new libgda crap yet. Best solution - drop it. -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski Please, just tell people to use KDE. - Linus @ GNOME Usability ml ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 07:37:08PM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: Adam =?iso-8859-2?Q?Go=B3=EAbiowski?= wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: bd: php-pear-MDB2_Driver_fbsql-0.1.1-1: req php-fbsql not found bd: php-pear-MDB2_Driver_oci8-0.1.2-1: req php-oci8 not found We can drop these. Sugested location for Obsoletes ? /dev/null as these packages were uninstallable all the time, and if anyone installed these with --nodeps than he must have known what he was doing. -- .. :: http://www.pomocdladominiki.com.pl/ -- możesz pomóc :: .. | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:21:18 +0100 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp-gnome-1.0.10-4: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp2-gnome-2.5.91-3: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch and who is the brave one to fight with athlon builder? It may be kernel related. Can anybody verify that it builds in native environment? # uname -r 2.6.8 Vanilla. And I am still waiting for suggested newer stable kernel for amd64 as I can't experiment with kernels there. 2.6.10* were highly unstable. (stable = stable with ext3 + quota + nfs + no proc restrictions) -- === Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. Math., Gdansk University of Technology ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 19:21, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: what about the missing dirs report? poldek 0.20 gives pretty extensive report $ poldek --sn ac --verify=deps,conflicts,file-conflicts,file-orphans, file-missing-deps -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:21:18PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Current TODO list, based on i686: bd: lilypond-2.2.4-2: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found lilypond sent to builders Will be ghostscript = 8.15 available in Ac, or some older lilypond needs to be AC-branched? bd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: req kernel-smp-sound-alsa = [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found bd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: req kernel-sound-alsa = [EMAIL PROTECTED] not found sent for test Doesn't build on most archs, trying to fix. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC: TODO list
On Wednesday 28 of December 2005 20:00, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: either we drop these or we can provide php5.0.x as php5/php50/php5.0 (which one is better?) and build mmcace/eaccelerator against it. Any comments about providing yet another instance of php? my vote on this (not that i use eaccel/mmcache) :) anyone is welcome to build older php and eaccel packages from cvs :) there is another problem with optimizers: mmcache/eac/apc do not work as intended with php = 5.0.5, apc is closest to beeing correct but dies with php 5.1, so it's just metter of time (and pls do not believe what respective homepages say about it ;p ) broken behavior can be seen when using php5 objects in a little more complicated way then $db = new MySQLi(); the effect kills apache child handling the request. my opinion (i use eac/apc daily): drop it from php5.x untill it's fixed - we already provide a broken version so it'll do no harm, but keep it with php4, where it works fine. apc will probably be ready first - i talked with the authors - the're doing massive code rewrites and most of the problems i've run into are fixed. any way - apc is intended to be part of the core of the next major php version. just some of my euro-cents ;] m. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
