Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-09-2006 15:11]:
On Friday 22 September 2006 13:11, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-09-2006 11:36]:
On Friday 22 September 2006 12:31, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-09-2006 00:22]:
xmltv from HEAD doesn't build again, could you help me out?
Sure, done. Tested in Th environment. Some %files are missing.
still fails on AC, some bad BR?
No, lack of policy for handling cases, when perl is distributed with
a module in version newer or equal than one we have distributed
separately.
what about policy that we don't bundle the packages in perl-modules?
IIRC, we kept (some of) them separate in perl 5.6. While preparing
5.8.0, my goals included:
* allow coexistence of different perl versions (I was hoping, that some
day RPM will start to handle multiple packages with the same name
nicely -- silly me)
* poldek -i perl installs whatever modules come with the perl tarball.
Right now, both are fulfilled. I'm not too convinced if the first one
is actually useful, though. Installing separate perl in /usr/local is
way easier, than dealing with RPM.
additional pros on that is that the base perl install gets smaller.
What would you like to strip?
PS I consider it to be rude: publishing e-mail without asking first.
--
Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp7wc0YcypMV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
