Re: SPECS: tao.spec - auto mono prov/req
On Friday 12 August 2005 02:49, Paweł Sakowski wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 00:25 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: There were some small changes in macros, so no need to fake. Will bumping rpm_macros_rev in rpm.spec and changing BR: rpm-build to BR: rpmbuild(macros) be sufficient? How does that work with backporting to AC-branch? yes. true. it won't work until it's really backported. (ie the BR could be satisfied but the actual behaviour not) so perhaps rpmbuild(monoautodeps) is the right choice. No need to introduce a Provides for every single new feature. rpm_macros_rev high enough has always served that purpose. If you're concerned that someone will bump macros rev on Ac again without backporting the mono changes, mark that as a TODO in AC-branch spec. Then again, if you're modifying it, you might port the change altogether as well. hmm. what about just creating new package rpm-monoprov and requiring that package on BR? $ rpm -qa | grep prov rpm-perlprov-4.4.1-5 rpm-pythonprov-4.4.1-5 -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: tao.spec - auto mono prov/req
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:29:55PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: what about just creating new package rpm-monoprov and requiring that package on BR? What should be in that package? macros.* are provided by rpm-build and mono-find-* are from mono. wolf -- Bartek . - Kto tam śpi? Taudul : .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: tao.spec - auto mono prov/req
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:42:24PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: i believe proper way of doing it is require some rpmbuild(macros) version (don't forget to document it in PLD-doc/BuildRequires.txt), in case someone backports it to ac-branch 4.4.1 version of rpm Almost all changes are in rpm's code, not in macros, so I don't see how it could work. Maybe some BR: rpm(monodep) would be better? wolf -- Bartek . - Wiecie o czym są Chłopi Reymonta? Taudul : - O chłopach. .: w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: tao.spec - auto mono prov/req
On Thursday 11 August 2005 23:29, Bartosz Taudul wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:42:24PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: i believe proper way of doing it is require some rpmbuild(macros) version (don't forget to document it in PLD-doc/BuildRequires.txt), in case someone backports it to ac-branch 4.4.1 version of rpm Almost all changes are in rpm's code, not in macros, so I don't see how it could work. Maybe some BR: rpm(monodep) would be better? ...or fake revision for it: $ cvs ci -f -m '- rev 1.234 for mono dep' rpm.macros wolf glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: tao.spec - auto mono prov/req
On Friday 12 August 2005 00:17, Bartosz Taudul wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:05:16AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: Almost all changes are in rpm's code, not in macros, so I don't see how it could work. Maybe some BR: rpm(monodep) would be better? ...or fake revision for it: $ cvs ci -f -m '- rev 1.234 for mono dep' rpm.macros There were some small changes in macros, so no need to fake. Will bumping rpm_macros_rev in rpm.spec and changing BR: rpm-build to BR: rpmbuild(macros) be sufficient? How does that work with backporting to AC-branch? yes. true. it won't work until it's really backported. (ie the BR could be satisfied but the actual behaviour not) so perhaps rpmbuild(monoautodeps) is the right choice. wolf -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
