-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
First, let me say that this discussion has diverged from the original topic to one of freedom and GPL/non-GPL advocacy, and is probably going to continue to go way off-topic. If people wish to continue to discuss this outside the bounds of a Plucker-related discussion, let's move it off-list. > This is why I disagree with the GPL as well as any DRM schemes, because it > forces authors down a certain path. 1.) What does the GPL have to do with DRM "schemes"? 2.) GPL enforces/reinforces the rights of the copyright holders. If I was going to be "forced down a certain path", I would certainly want to pick one that "forced" me to retain my rights to my creations and work. > Especially if the entire world uses DRM, and you can't choose a different > way to release your work... This will never happen, so we don't have to worry about it. > or especially if the entire world is comprised of GPL-licenced software. Again, you confuse restrictive "schemes" with reinforcing licensing. This is all off-topic at this point. Let's move it elsewhere. d. perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9oDCskRQERnB1rkoRAnQnAKDM+84lFo+rkZhjEWjeUE/F280GewCbBQKt bnxmxRKJYVTYcZ7sqFgteNE= =RYNw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev