Re: [PLUG] Question About Module Loading

2009-12-28 Thread Dwight Hubbard
Did you remake the initrd image?  

Depending on your settings it's possible the module is getting loaded by 
initrd before the normal module loading takes place.  This is more common with 
scsi modules but I've had it happen with ethernet cards on some distros that 
support running with root of an NFS server.

On Thursday 24 December 2009 09:30:05 pm Mark Phillips wrote:
 I just installed Debian stable (2.6-amd64 kernel) on a machine. I had to
 remove the kernel module for the Ethernet card and add a different one. The
 new module compiled etc and works. However, I had a problem preventing the
 old module from loading. There was no modprobe.conf file, but instead a
 directory modprobe.d with a lot of files in it. However, I could not find
 the expected alias line with the bad module's name. I finally googled a
 solution, and I am curious if this is the new way to disabling a kernel
 module:
 I created a file in /etc/modprobe.d/ called 00local. That file has one
  line: install r8169 /bin/true. This prevented the module r8169 from being
  loaded. I grepped all of /etc/ looking for r8169 and could not find where
  it was being loaded. I am so confused
 
 G'night and Happy Holidays to everyone!
 
 Mark
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
 

-- 
Dwight Hubbard
Owner Effective Automation Solutions
Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
Email: dwi...@dwighthubbard.com
Phone: (503) 941-0327
Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread drew wymore
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Michael Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com
 wrote:

 On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 21:13 -0800, Daniel Johnson wrote:
   The other diskless machine on another nic off of the same server, dodo,
   boots just fine by the way.  Is something obviously wrong in my dhcp
   config file or am I looking at a problem with the switch?  DHCP worked
   when I was using a 10BaseT hub which makes me wonder if the line can't
   support 100baseTX.
 
  It could be a problem with autoconfiguring the speed, and duplex of
  the connection.  I've had two switches decide on different modes, and
  thus get a broken network.  When one side is a dumb 10 megabit hub it
  doesn't try to negotiate, so you never have to worry about that
  problem.  If you can force it into different modes try that.

 I forced the server to half duplex using ethtool, but I can't force the
 client to go to half duplex.  Put the 10Mbit dumb hub back in, dhcp
 worked like a charm and the machine network booted no problem.  I wonder
 if being a switch it was blocking the dhcp replies?  I should in theory
 be able to pull the hub and replace it with a crossover coupler.  I'm
 starting to think that the switch I was trying to use is bad or maybe
 I need a 100 megabit per second hub instead.  Thing is, I use another
 DSS5+ switch with a linksys wireless WAP11 plugged into it that
 configures via dhcp no problem.  I'm not sure what the issue is here.

 Just to double check, 190' is within the range limitations for
 100BaseTX, right?

 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Yes, up to 300' in the accepted range. I don't think Daniel nor was I
referring to the client/server but the switch itself. Most switches are auto
sensing the link speed and do just fine, without knowing what kind of switch
it is and what capabilities it has, it's hard to say what count be causing
the problem. Could be VLAN's, could be auto sense not working, could be an
ACL .. but without knowing what hardware it is, hard to say.

Drew-
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Mike Connors
Michael Robinson wrote:
 I wonder if being a switch it was blocking the dhcp replies? 
Switches don't block broadcast protocols like DHCP. Routers do and if 
DHCP traffic
has to traverse a different network than a DHCP proxy must be configured.

However, there are a couple of cases where dhcp requests/replies could 
be inadvertently
blocked.

1. The DHCP client and dhcp server are on different VLANs.

2. Spanning Tree port configuration is another. With regular spanning 
tree (8021.d),
the switch port could be in blocking mode while the spanning tree is 
being mapped out and
therefore any DHCP traffic will not pass thru the port. As best practice 
we always
configured the switch ports with rapid spanning tree (802.1w), so that 
spanning tree convergence
happened faster and didn't impact dhcp requests.


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Robinson
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 01:12 -0800, Mike Connors wrote:
 Michael Robinson wrote:
  I wonder if being a switch it was blocking the dhcp replies? 
 Switches don't block broadcast protocols like DHCP. Routers do and if 
 DHCP traffic
 has to traverse a different network than a DHCP proxy must be configured.
 
 However, there are a couple of cases where dhcp requests/replies could 
 be inadvertently
 blocked.
 
 1. The DHCP client and dhcp server are on different VLANs.
 
 2. Spanning Tree port configuration is another. With regular spanning 
 tree (8021.d),
 the switch port could be in blocking mode while the spanning tree is 
 being mapped out and
 therefore any DHCP traffic will not pass thru the port. As best practice 
 we always
 configured the switch ports with rapid spanning tree (802.1w), so that 
 spanning tree convergence
 happened faster and didn't impact dhcp requests.

No VLANS are in use.  I am running DHCP 3 server on CentOS 5.3 listening
on an actual Netgear FA311 network card with an actual Cat5e UTP cable
running 100' into the attic where at this point I go to a 10BaseT hub
and from there I continue on with a Cat5 STP cable outside, underground,
back above ground, and into another building where I terminate at
another FA311 network card in my diskless server.  I tried to replace
the Dlink hub with a Netgear DSS5+ 5 port switch.  I guess my switch is
faulty.  It seems unlikely that the cables themselves didn't handle
100BaseTX transmission okay.  Obviously there was some networking from
the diskless client to the server at 100BaseTX, but somehow the switch
broke DHCP.  Put the slow dumb hub back in, works just fine.  Trouble 
is, I want the higher speed because I'm extending with 802.11g outdoor
access points.  I'm thinking of getting a cable joiner that also acts
as a crossover device and using that instead of a hub or switch.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Mike Connors
Michael Robinson wrote:I tried to replace
 the Dlink hub with a Netgear DSS5+ 5 port switch.  I guess my switch is
 faulty.  It seems unlikely that the cables themselves didn't handle
 100BaseTX transmission okay.  Obviously there was some networking from
 the diskless client to the server at 100BaseTX, but somehow the switch
 broke DHCP.  Put the slow dumb hub back in, works just fine.  
   
It is possible that the switch is faulty, however my experience with
auto-negotiation is that each vendor (hub, switch, network card)
interpret and implement the N-WAY standards differently.

Does the D-Link hub support auto-negotiation? That could explain why
the hub works and the switch doesn't. If the hub doesn't support 
auto-neg then
both ends of the connection will fall back to 10mbps half-dup and all is 
well.

If auto-negotiation isn't configured the same on both the switch port
and NIC then there will be duplex mismatch errors.

A telltale sign of duplex mismatch is Ethernet errors such as
Frame Check Sequence errors, late collisions, and runts.

You can use  the 'ethtool' command to look at Ethernet interface error 
counters.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Help - Just Hosed My Grub 2 Install and Can't Boot

2009-12-28 Thread Mark Phillips
I was just finishing a new Debian squeeze install on a new laptop, and the
last step was updating grub to grub 2. I went through
update-from-grub-legacy, but I hit return before I ticked the box for sda.
Now my system won't boot - I get error 15 when it starts up with grub. I am
sure I just wiped out the old grub and did not install the new one. Any
suggestions on how to go back and fix this problem? I can't boot into either
windows or Debian.

Thanks!

Mark
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Help - Just Hosed My Grub 2 Install and Can't Boot

2009-12-28 Thread Carlos Konstanski
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Mark Phillips wrote:

 Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:35:54 -0700
 From: Mark Phillips m...@phillipsmarketing.biz
 Reply-To: General Linux/UNIX discussion and help;civil and on-topic
 plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
 To: Phoenix Linux Users plug-disc...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us,
 Portland Linux Users Group plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
 Subject: [PLUG] Help - Just Hosed My Grub 2 Install and Can't Boot
 
 I was just finishing a new Debian squeeze install on a new laptop, and the
 last step was updating grub to grub 2. I went through
 update-from-grub-legacy, but I hit return before I ticked the box for sda.
 Now my system won't boot - I get error 15 when it starts up with grub. I am
 sure I just wiped out the old grub and did not install the new one. Any
 suggestions on how to go back and fix this problem? I can't boot into either
 windows or Debian.

 Thanks!

 Mark

Here are some steps to follow:

1. Boot from a linux CD (knoppix, finnux, etc).

2. Mount the root filesystem:

cd /mnt
mkdir sda3 (assuming this is name of your root partition)
mount /dev/sda3 sda3

3. cd into the root filesystem mount point, and then mount the boot
partition (if your /boot resides on its own partition):

cd sda3
mount /dev/sda1 boot

4. Just to be safe, mount /dev and /proc:

mount -t proc none proc
mount -o bind /dev dev

5. chroot into your root filesystem:

chroot . /bin/bash
source /etc/profile

6. Run the command grub to enter the interactive grub shell.

7. Once in the grub shell, type the following grub commands:

root (hd0,0)
setup (hd0)
quit

8. Type exit to exit the chroot.

9. Unmount all mount points you have previously mounted:

umount boot dev proc
cd ..
umount sda3

10. Reboot. Take the CD out. Enjoy!

Carlos
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Tim Wescott
I'm a new Subversion user, so be gentle.

OK.  In Subversion you can check out a bunch of files, which creates a 
working copy.

But I know you can also grab that same group of files without Subversion 
setting up the working copy, which is handy when you're releasing code 
from a tag and don't intend to ever, ever change it.  I've done it.  
I've found how to do it in the documentation.  It's probably dead 
simple.  But I can't find it!  Augh!

Any clues for the clueless?  I know I can just do a check out and 
manually delete Subversion's tracking files, but I'd really rather 
remember how to do it 'right'.

Thanks.

-- 
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
Voice: 503-631-7815
Cell:  503-349-8432
http://www.wescottdesign.com


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Scott Garman
Tim Wescott wrote:
 I'm a new Subversion user, so be gentle.
 
 OK.  In Subversion you can check out a bunch of files, which creates a 
 working copy.
 
 But I know you can also grab that same group of files without Subversion 
 setting up the working copy, which is handy when you're releasing code 
 from a tag and don't intend to ever, ever change it.  I've done it.  
 I've found how to do it in the documentation.  It's probably dead 
 simple.  But I can't find it!  Augh!
 
 Any clues for the clueless?  I know I can just do a check out and 
 manually delete Subversion's tracking files, but I'd really rather 
 remember how to do it 'right'.

This is called doing an export of the code. So instead of doing an svn 
co you do an svn export.

Scott

-- 
Scott Garman
sgarman at zenlinux dot com
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Tim Wescott
Scott Garman wrote:
 Tim Wescott wrote:
   
 I'm a new Subversion user, so be gentle.

 OK.  In Subversion you can check out a bunch of files, which creates a 
 working copy.

 But I know you can also grab that same group of files without Subversion 
 setting up the working copy, which is handy when you're releasing code 
 from a tag and don't intend to ever, ever change it.  I've done it.  
 I've found how to do it in the documentation.  It's probably dead 
 simple.  But I can't find it!  Augh!

 Any clues for the clueless?  I know I can just do a check out and 
 manually delete Subversion's tracking files, but I'd really rather 
 remember how to do it 'right'.
 

 This is called doing an export of the code. So instead of doing an svn 
 co you do an svn export.

 Scott

   
Ah!  Now that's stunningly obvious!

(gee I feel stupid).

Thanks.  I have no trouble with the hard parts -- it's the easy parts 
that trip me up.

-- 
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
Voice: 503-631-7815
Cell:  503-349-8432
http://www.wescottdesign.com


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Scott Garman
Tim Wescott wrote:
 This is called doing an export of the code. So instead of doing an svn 
 co you do an svn export.

 Scott

   
 Ah!  Now that's stunningly obvious!
 
 (gee I feel stupid).
 
 Thanks.  I have no trouble with the hard parts -- it's the easy parts 
 that trip me up.

While it was a simple question, I don't think it was a stupid one. If 
you don't know the term to describe something, that makes it a lot 
harder to find your answer online.

I'm a git newbie myself and I know I've asked a lot of questions like 
this to folks on IRC.

Scott

-- 
Scott Garman
sgarman at zenlinux dot com
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Larry Brigman
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Michael Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:


 No VLANS are in use.  I am running DHCP 3 server on CentOS 5.3 listening
 on an actual Netgear FA311 network card with an actual Cat5e UTP cable
 running 100' into the attic where at this point I go to a 10BaseT hub
 and from there I continue on with a Cat5 STP cable outside, underground,
 back above ground, and into another building where I terminate at
 another FA311 network card in my diskless server.  I tried to replace
 the Dlink hub with a Netgear DSS5+ 5 port switch.  I guess my switch is
 faulty.  It seems unlikely that the cables themselves didn't handle
 100BaseTX transmission okay.  Obviously there was some networking from
 the diskless client to the server at 100BaseTX, but somehow the switch
 broke DHCP.  Put the slow dumb hub back in, works just fine.  Trouble
 is, I want the higher speed because I'm extending with 802.11g outdoor
 access points.  I'm thinking of getting a cable joiner that also acts
 as a crossover device and using that instead of a hub or switch.

In my google search and a search of Netgear's web site I don't find a DSS5+5.
I do find a D-Link DSS5+5.

Also the link lights on the switch are for just one set of wires.  You
will need to check
the link status on both ends.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Robinson
On a hunch after verifying that it still works when I use a 10Mbit hub,
I replaced the hub with a crossover coupler.  That is, I used something
that is almost equivalent to a 100Mbit hub with 2 ports.  It isn't
working where I'm seeing the same symptoms.

What could be making this work at 10Mbit but not at 100Mbit?  The first
line in the first building is 100' of Cat5e UTP cable, the second line
is 90' of at least Cat5 STP cable.

I'll have to check the lights on both ends.  It just seems odd, I have 
a Netgear FA311 nic on both ends so they should be able to talk to each
other.

I have a new Netgear switch, but I don't want to open it unless I can't
get this working.

I wish I had some way of verifying that the line can operate at 
100 Mbps.

I'm wondering if the Cat5 STP cable is having problems.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Mike Connors
Michael Robinson wrote:
 I'm wondering if the Cat5 STP cable is having problems.
If I were working on this problem, the 1st thing I'd do is use the 
ethtool command
to look at the physical Ethernet statistics on both sides. If there's 
any problems at the physical layer
you'll see them reflected in error counters.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Robinson

On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 15:28 -0800, Mike Connors wrote:
 Michael Robinson wrote:
  I'm wondering if the Cat5 STP cable is having problems.
 If I were working on this problem, the 1st thing I'd do is use the 
 ethtool command
 to look at the physical Ethernet statistics on both sides. If there's 
 any problems at the physical layer
 you'll see them reflected in error counters.
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Trouble is, the other end doesn't boot if this doesn't work.  I was
seeing packet errors on the far end though before I tried to reformat
the etherboot disk.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread wes
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Michael Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.comwrote:


 On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 15:28 -0800, Mike Connors wrote:
  Michael Robinson wrote:
   I'm wondering if the Cat5 STP cable is having problems.
  If I were working on this problem, the 1st thing I'd do is use the
  ethtool command
  to look at the physical Ethernet statistics on both sides. If there's
  any problems at the physical layer
  you'll see them reflected in error counters.
  ___
  PLUG mailing list
  PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
  http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

 Trouble is, the other end doesn't boot if this doesn't work.  I was
 seeing packet errors on the far end though before I tried to reformat
 the etherboot disk.


So boot the other end, then switch the hardware.

-wes
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Troubleshooting DHCP...

2009-12-28 Thread Steve D...
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Michael Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:

 Trouble is, the other end doesn't boot if this doesn't work.  I was
 seeing packet errors on the far end though before I tried to reformat
 the etherboot disk.

  Can you boot that machine off a Live CD?  It would give you a lot
more tools to work with on that end.

Steve D...

-- 
Every perception is a gamble
Robert Anton Wilson
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Logitech MK700 Linux...

2009-12-28 Thread Paul
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 00:08 -0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
 I got a wireless desktop keyboard and mouse for Christmas.  I'm
 wondering if it is at all possible to map the special keys under
 Linux?  The scroll lock doesn't seem to work.  The keyboard is 
 designed for Windows XP and later, typical.  Logitech really
 should consider Linux support.

I did something similar recently. Started by using xev to get the
scancodes, then used xmodmap to set keysyms. These exist for all of the
multimedia keys on my keyboard (e.g. XF86Mail, note these are arbitrary,
yhou can bind any key to them so for instance I've got the calculator
key bound to XF86Terminal). I then use xbindkeys to launch applications
on key press. Within that I use another package called xte to simulate
mouse events. This enables me to have the volume knob act as a scroll
wheel (for use with Ardour) but you might find it useful for the various
rocker/scroll switches if they aren't doing anything.

Paul M 

 
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Scott Garman
# on Monday 28 December 2009 11:28:

 svn export.
 Ah!  Now that's stunningly obvious!
While it was a simple question, I don't think it was a stupid one. If
you don't know the term to describe something, that makes it a lot
harder to find your answer online.

I have to give svn learnability points for `svn help` listing all of the 
possible commands (unlike `git help` which barely scratches the surface 
of what you see in `git-^I`.)

--Eric
-- 
... unsustainable.  And that word means something -- it doesn't just 
mean we don't like it.
--Michael Pollan
---
http://scratchcomputing.com
---
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Subversion Question

2009-12-28 Thread Mike Connors
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
 I have to give svn learnability points for `svn help` listing all of the 
 possible commands (unlike `git help` which barely scratches the surface 
 of what you see in `git-^I`.)
And if that weren't enough, there's is this lil' gem also...

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn-book.html
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Question About Locales/Languages

2009-12-28 Thread Mike Connors
Mark Phillips wrote:
 Actually, I found the solution for gnome by looking through the menus,
 except it does not paint a nice keyboard layout on the screen. Add the
 keyboard-indicator to the gnome panel and then edit the keyboard preferences
 to add a German/Spanish keyboard layout. No cute flags, just letters (USA,
 EU, etc) and no keyboard layout on screen. But close.

   
I think once you have the keyboard layout set, you just need to use
the assistive technology to get an onscreen keyboard. KDE and GNOME both
support this.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Question About Locales/Languages

2009-12-28 Thread Scott Garman
Mark Phillips wrote:
 I forget to say I use gnome. There must be a better way than fooling with
 with the console to set this up?
 
 Actually, I found the solution for gnome by looking through the menus,
 except it does not paint a nice keyboard layout on the screen. Add the
 keyboard-indicator to the gnome panel and then edit the keyboard preferences
 to add a German/Spanish keyboard layout. No cute flags, just letters (USA,
 DEU, etc) and no keyboard layout on screen. But close.

If you add the Keyboard Indicator applet to the GNOME panel, you can 
right-click on it and select Show Current Layout. Is that what you're 
looking for?

Scott

-- 
Scott Garman
sgarman at zenlinux dot com
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] NFSROOT problems...

2009-12-28 Thread Michael Robinson
I'm trying to create a new kernel to boot from.  The old kernel has ACPI
support and it is locking up on boot.  I'm trying to compile a 2.6.27.39
kernel and the bzImage file is too big.  I need it to be 1.4 megs or
smaller where I'm 200k too big.  Is there any way around this limitation
that etherboot seems to impose?

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] NFSROOT problems...

2009-12-28 Thread drew wymore
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Michael Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com
 wrote:

 I'm trying to create a new kernel to boot from.  The old kernel has ACPI
 support and it is locking up on boot.  I'm trying to compile a 2.6.27.39
 kernel and the bzImage file is too big.  I need it to be 1.4 megs or
 smaller where I'm 200k too big.  Is there any way around this limitation
 that etherboot seems to impose?

 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Make everything but what is absolutely necessary modular?
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] A Question About Locales/Languages

2009-12-28 Thread John Jason Jordan
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:09:08 -0700
Mark Phillips m...@phillipsmarketing.biz dijo:

One of my daughter's has a Mac and it has a neat feature that allows
her to switch languages for her keyboard so she can type in Spanish in
openoffice. When she switches to Spanish, a nice keyboard map appears
on the screen so she can see where the special characters are located
(i.e. the n-tilde is right next to the L key). This does not switch
all the menus etc to Spanish. It just switches the keyboard to a
Spanish keyboard. The display of the Spanish keyboard on the screen is
really important.

Is there a way to configure Debian so there is a little country flag
in the tool bar so I can switch my keyboard from English to German and
get a small keyboard map for the German keys?

I'm not sure if we have what you need, but go here:

http://ipa4linguists.pbworks.com/FrontPage

And check out Mapping Your Keyboard. There is a Linux link to
Tavultesoft.

Some of the other pages may be useful as well, as there are lots of
other ways to enter non-US-English characters without remapping your
keyboard.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug