Re: [PLUG] systemd, an improvement? - argument for

2014-12-05 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 06:34:14PM -0800, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
 After reading http://boycottsystemd.org, I’m curious who thinks that systemd 
 is an improvement for servers, and if so why/how. Are people running CentOS 7 
 on servers yet?

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1149530#p1149530

You'll need to scroll down a page to the Benefits:  bit. Though the listing of 
arguments against has some funny bits.

Summary:
Hotplug capable
knowable system state
modular
allows dbus/udev to return to their original purpose
reduces number of explicit ordering dependencies
provides sandboxing features
systemd service files can be written without distribution implementation 
knowledge.
systemd is a cross-distro project, creation team had deep background
...


-- 
  Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
The difference betwee a million and a billion is the difference between 
a sip of wine and 30 seconds with your daughter, and a bottle of gin and a 
night with her.
~ XKCD http://xkcd.com/558/
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] systemd, an improvement? - argument for

2014-12-05 Thread Darren Couch
 They forked Debian because of systemd.., that should give anyone pause:
https://devuan.org

Also, there is the bit that systemd is lgpl.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us
wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 06:34:14PM -0800, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
  After reading http://boycottsystemd.org, I’m curious who thinks that
 systemd is an improvement for servers, and if so why/how. Are people
 running CentOS 7 on servers yet?

 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1149530#p1149530

 You'll need to scroll down a page to the Benefits:  bit. Though the
 listing of arguments against has some funny bits.

 Summary:
 Hotplug capable
 knowable system state
 modular
 allows dbus/udev to return to their original purpose
 reduces number of explicit ordering dependencies
 provides sandboxing features
 systemd service files can be written without distribution
 implementation knowledge.
 systemd is a cross-distro project, creation team had deep background
 ...


 --
   Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
 Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
 The difference betwee a million and a billion is the difference between
 a sip of wine and 30 seconds with your daughter, and a bottle of gin and a
 night with her.
 ~ XKCD http://xkcd.com/558/
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug




-- 
Darren R. Couch
dco...@gmail.com
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] systemd, an improvement?

2014-11-26 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Louis Kowolowski wrote:

After reading http://boycottsystemd.org, I’m curious who thinks that 
systemd is an improvement for servers, and if so why/how. Are people 
running CentOS 7 on servers yet?


I've got CentOS 7 and Fedora 19 on servers, so I've been working with 
systemd for a while.


It didn't take me all that long to revamp my cfengine rules to deal 
with systemd; the rulesets are similar:


  /sbin/service args = sendmail condrestart;

becomes

  /bin/systemctl args = restart sendmail.service;

I don't yet understand all the ins and outs of systemd. I have a good 
handle on the .service units, but the others (.mount, .path, .scope, 
.socket, .device, and even .target) are still works in progress.


The systemctl binary, while not intuitive at all, is easy to learn and 
provides a consistent interface to things. I do not miss init scripts 
at all. The boycott page conveniently overlooks all the init scripts 
that broke, badly, when Ubuntu decided to make /bin/sh a version of 
dash rather than bash. System V on modern Linux systems is very 
tool-dependent as well.


I'm not a fan of journald and I always setup rsyslog to ensure I 
have text log files, but that's the only long-term downside I've 
encountered so far.


One of my holiday projects is doing the systemd version of Linux From 
Scratch, just so I have a better basic understanding of its 
capabilities and competencies.


I like the possibilities of systemd, but I can see the downsides as 
well. At this point, I don't see any reason whatsoever to get all 
worked up about the change. It seems to work, which is all that I ask 
of it.


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] systemd, an improvement?

2014-11-25 Thread Louis Kowolowski
After reading http://boycottsystemd.org, I’m curious who thinks that systemd is 
an improvement for servers, and if so why/how. Are people running CentOS 7 on 
servers yet?

—   
Louis Kowolowskilou...@cryptomonkeys.org
Cryptomonkeys:   http://www.cryptomonkeys.com/

Making life more interesting for people since 1977



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug