Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-24 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:


Maybe you can speed things up by pdf2txt and identify the lines of interest
in awk.


Thomas,

  Almost every page is different. All have headers, data for a variable
number of hours (some with flags in the left margin, most without), and some
have summaries at the bottom. Then there are the days with missing data. And
some days have data in a specific column (but not on all data rows) while
other days are blank in that column.

  And, this is a one-time process. It's to get the data from the source
documents into a format suitable for import into a database and statistical
analyses.

THanks,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Tomas Kuchta
Maybe you can speed things up by pdf2txt and identify the lines of interest
in awk.



On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 4:43 PM Rich Shepard  wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
>
> > Depending on your awk script and/or your data - this can have significant
> > runtime impact, beside nicer coding style.
>
> Tomas,
>
>It takes me 5-10 minutes to highlight data in the PDF file and paste it
> into a text file. When done the shell script, calling two sed and six awk
> scripts runs in less than a second. The prompt returns almost immediately.
>
> Rich
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Russell Senior
Making the code more complex than necessary leads to long latencies as you
query the plug list.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 16:45 Rich Shepard  wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
>
> > Depending on your awk script and/or your data - this can have significant
> > runtime impact, beside nicer coding style.
>
> Tomas,
>
>It takes me 5-10 minutes to highlight data in the PDF file and paste it
> into a text file. When done the shell script, calling two sed and six awk
> scripts runs in less than a second. The prompt returns almost immediately.
>
> Rich
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:


Depending on your awk script and/or your data - this can have significant
runtime impact, beside nicer coding style.


Tomas,

  It takes me 5-10 minutes to highlight data in the PDF file and paste it
into a text file. When done the shell script, calling two sed and six awk
scripts runs in less than a second. The prompt returns almost immediately.

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Tomas Kuchta
I hope that I am not beating dead horse with this.

There is also performance problem with using case/switch statement like
this - the whole code block gets evaluated/run for every record/line.

If you use it the way suggested, the code block is only run for the correct
record/lines. You can optimize it further if you keep simple comparison
such as NF==35 condition before regexp comparison/search.

Depending on your awk script and/or your data - this can have significant
runtime impact, beside nicer coding style.

Tomas

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 3:21 PM Rich Shepard  wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
>
> > Do not use switch/case - just use NF==35 {print "I see 35 columns on this
> > line"}
> > ... type of a code.
> >
> > If you need more than that you can do something like this:
> > NF==35 && $2<5 {print "I see 35 columns on this line and column 2 is less
> > than 5"}
> >
> > I guess that is what Russell was saying too.
>
> Tomas,
>
>It turns out that the switch/case statement works when the whole thing
> is
> enclosed in curly braces because it's all part of the action response. So
> it
> would look like this:
>
> { switch (NF) {
>case 1:
>  ...
>case 2:
>  ...
>}
> }
>
>But, using the number of fields as the pattern does make it easier to
> read:
>
> NF == 36 { print  }
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Tomas Kuchta wrote:


Do not use switch/case - just use NF==35 {print "I see 35 columns on this
line"}
... type of a code.

If you need more than that you can do something like this:
NF==35 && $2<5 {print "I see 35 columns on this line and column 2 is less
than 5"}

I guess that is what Russell was saying too.


Tomas,

  It turns out that the switch/case statement works when the whole thing is
enclosed in curly braces because it's all part of the action response. So it
would look like this:

{ switch (NF) {
  case 1:
...
  case 2:
...
  }
}

  But, using the number of fields as the pattern does make it easier to
read:

NF == 36 { print  }

Thanks,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Tomas Kuchta
Do not use switch/case - just use NF==35 {print "I see 35 columns on this
line"}
... type of a code.

If you need more than that you can do something like this:
NF==35 && $2<5 {print "I see 35 columns on this line and column 2 is less
than 5"}

I guess that is what Russell was saying too.

Tomas

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 12:30 PM Russell Senior 
wrote:

> Ah, gawk does have switch(), but not in compatibility mode.  Maybe you are
> in compatibility mode.  But in either case, I don't see the need here (see
> my "thirdly" suggestion, and ignore my NR == 37 typo).
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Russell Senior <
> russ...@personaltelco.net>
> wrote:
>
> > First off, I don't have your book and have no idea what you are trying to
> > do.
> >
> > Second, I think you want NF, not NR.
> >
> > Thirdly, I think you want to just write matching rules (mawk manpage
> > didn't mention switch), e.g.:
> >
> >   NF == 38 { print stuff }
> >   NR == 37 { print other stuff }
> >
> > Lastly, if the vertical bars are significant, you should maybe parse on
> > that character to harmonize the input to a subsequent stage ... but
> that's
> > just a guess, since I don't know wtf you are doing.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Rich Shepard  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>   gawk-4.1.3 is installed here. According to Arnold Robbins' 'Effective
> >> awk
> >> Programming, 4th Ed',  page 154, the syntax for the switch statement is
> >> used
> >> in this code:
> >>
> >> # Get line length (number of fields)
> >> switch (NR) {
> >> case 36: # No shifts present.
> >> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $18, $19, $20, $21,
> >> $22, $23, $24, $25, $29, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36 }
> >> break
> >> case 37: # 1 shift present.
> >> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $19, $20, $21, $22,
> >> $23, $24, $25, $26, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37 }
> >> break
> >> case 38: # 2 shifts present.
> >> { print $1, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20, $21, $22, $23,
> >> $24, $25, $26, $27, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37, $38 }
> >> break
> >> case ?:
> >> break
> >> }
> >>
> >>   Running this code on data results in syntax errors:
> >>
> >> $ gawk -f trim-fields.awk test.dat > out
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: switch (NR) {
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: ^ syntax error
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: case 36: # No shifts present.
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: ^ syntax error
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: case 37: # 1 shift present.
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: ^ syntax error
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: case 38: # 2 shifts present.
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: ^ syntax error
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: case ?:
> >> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: ^ syntax error
> >>
> >>   I'm sure it's a simple error on my part but I'm just not seeing the
> >> problem.
> >>
> >>   Test data set (test.dat) has lines with each length:
> >>
> >> 11/24/07 0400 12.12 |0400 2090 0.01| 12.10 12.10 12.04 12.08 12.12 12.12
> >> 12.10 12.06 1200 12.00 |1200 1930 0.01| 12.08 12.06 12.07 12.04 12.00
> 12.04
> >> 12.03 12.03 12.05 | 2000 2000 | 12.03 12.06 12.04 12.01 12.00 12.02
> 12.00
> >> 12.01
> >> 11/25/07  12.01 | 1950 0.01| 12.01 12.01 11.99 11.97 11.97 11.98
> >> 11.96 11.96 2400 11.87 |2400 1770 0.00| 11.97 11.95 11.95 11.95 11.93
> 11.91
> >> 11.93 11.93 11.95 | 1860 1860 | 11.96 11.97 11.93 11.93 11.91 11.89
> 11.89
> >> 11.90
> >> 11/26/07 1830 11.97 |1830 1890 | 11.87 11.87 11.90 11.90 11.89 11.86
> >> 11.87 11.81 0800 11.78 |0800 1680 0.00| 11.78 11.88 11.86 11.79 11.81
> 11.89
> >> 11.81 11.82 11.87 | 1770 1770 | 11.80 11.79 11.92 11.92 11.94 11.92
> 11.95
> >> 11.93
> >> 11/27/07 0230 12.05 |0230 1990 | 11.94 11.99 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04
> >> 12.04 12.03 2230 11.93 |2230 1840 | 12.03 12.02 12.02 11.98 11.95 11.97
> >> 11.96 11.95 11.98 | 1900 1900 | 11.94 11.94 11.94 11.96 11.97 11.97
> 11.94
> >> 11.93
> >> 11/28/07 2000 12.02 |2000 1950 | 11.94 11.92 11.91 11.92 11.90 11.88
> >> 11.88 11.86 1430 11.81 |1430 1710 | 11.85 11.85 11.86 11.86 11.85 11.82
> >> 11.82 11.83 11.89 | 1790 1790 | 11.86 11.86 11.87 11.90 12.02 12.00
> 11.90
> >> 11.91
> >>
> >>   I'm stuck (again) and I don't think this is a white space issue or an
> >> improper newline placement.
> >>
> >> Rich
> >> ___
> >> PLUG mailing list
> >> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> >> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> >>
> >
> >
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors [RESOLVED]

2018-07-23 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Russell Senior wrote:

Russell,


Second, I think you want NF, not NR.


  Yes. That is correct.


Thirdly, I think you want to just write matching rules (mawk manpage didn't
mention switch), e.g.:

 NF == 38 { print stuff }
 NR == 37 { print other stuff }


  Sigh. Yes, specifying the pattern followed by the action is the solution.
I moved this processing from a bash script using IF - ELIF - ELSE so the
switch statement seemed to be the right choice.

  Thanks for getting me back to the (g)awk solution.

Best regards,

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Russell Senior
Ah, gawk does have switch(), but not in compatibility mode.  Maybe you are
in compatibility mode.  But in either case, I don't see the need here (see
my "thirdly" suggestion, and ignore my NR == 37 typo).

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Russell Senior 
wrote:

> First off, I don't have your book and have no idea what you are trying to
> do.
>
> Second, I think you want NF, not NR.
>
> Thirdly, I think you want to just write matching rules (mawk manpage
> didn't mention switch), e.g.:
>
>   NF == 38 { print stuff }
>   NR == 37 { print other stuff }
>
> Lastly, if the vertical bars are significant, you should maybe parse on
> that character to harmonize the input to a subsequent stage ... but that's
> just a guess, since I don't know wtf you are doing.
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Rich Shepard 
> wrote:
>
>>   gawk-4.1.3 is installed here. According to Arnold Robbins' 'Effective
>> awk
>> Programming, 4th Ed',  page 154, the syntax for the switch statement is
>> used
>> in this code:
>>
>> # Get line length (number of fields)
>> switch (NR) {
>> case 36: # No shifts present.
>> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $18, $19, $20, $21,
>> $22, $23, $24, $25, $29, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36 }
>> break
>> case 37: # 1 shift present.
>> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $19, $20, $21, $22,
>> $23, $24, $25, $26, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37 }
>> break
>> case 38: # 2 shifts present.
>> { print $1, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20, $21, $22, $23,
>> $24, $25, $26, $27, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37, $38 }
>> break
>> case ?:
>> break
>> }
>>
>>   Running this code on data results in syntax errors:
>>
>> $ gawk -f trim-fields.awk test.dat > out
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: switch (NR) {
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: ^ syntax error
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: case 36: # No shifts present.
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: ^ syntax error
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: case 37: # 1 shift present.
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: ^ syntax error
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: case 38: # 2 shifts present.
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: ^ syntax error
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: case ?:
>> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: ^ syntax error
>>
>>   I'm sure it's a simple error on my part but I'm just not seeing the
>> problem.
>>
>>   Test data set (test.dat) has lines with each length:
>>
>> 11/24/07 0400 12.12 |0400 2090 0.01| 12.10 12.10 12.04 12.08 12.12 12.12
>> 12.10 12.06 1200 12.00 |1200 1930 0.01| 12.08 12.06 12.07 12.04 12.00 12.04
>> 12.03 12.03 12.05 | 2000 2000 | 12.03 12.06 12.04 12.01 12.00 12.02 12.00
>> 12.01
>> 11/25/07  12.01 | 1950 0.01| 12.01 12.01 11.99 11.97 11.97 11.98
>> 11.96 11.96 2400 11.87 |2400 1770 0.00| 11.97 11.95 11.95 11.95 11.93 11.91
>> 11.93 11.93 11.95 | 1860 1860 | 11.96 11.97 11.93 11.93 11.91 11.89 11.89
>> 11.90
>> 11/26/07 1830 11.97 |1830 1890 | 11.87 11.87 11.90 11.90 11.89 11.86
>> 11.87 11.81 0800 11.78 |0800 1680 0.00| 11.78 11.88 11.86 11.79 11.81 11.89
>> 11.81 11.82 11.87 | 1770 1770 | 11.80 11.79 11.92 11.92 11.94 11.92 11.95
>> 11.93
>> 11/27/07 0230 12.05 |0230 1990 | 11.94 11.99 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04
>> 12.04 12.03 2230 11.93 |2230 1840 | 12.03 12.02 12.02 11.98 11.95 11.97
>> 11.96 11.95 11.98 | 1900 1900 | 11.94 11.94 11.94 11.96 11.97 11.97 11.94
>> 11.93
>> 11/28/07 2000 12.02 |2000 1950 | 11.94 11.92 11.91 11.92 11.90 11.88
>> 11.88 11.86 1430 11.81 |1430 1710 | 11.85 11.85 11.86 11.86 11.85 11.82
>> 11.82 11.83 11.89 | 1790 1790 | 11.86 11.86 11.87 11.90 12.02 12.00 11.90
>> 11.91
>>
>>   I'm stuck (again) and I don't think this is a white space issue or an
>> improper newline placement.
>>
>> Rich
>> ___
>> PLUG mailing list
>> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
>> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>
>
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Russell Senior
First off, I don't have your book and have no idea what you are trying to
do.

Second, I think you want NF, not NR.

Thirdly, I think you want to just write matching rules (mawk manpage didn't
mention switch), e.g.:

  NF == 38 { print stuff }
  NR == 37 { print other stuff }

Lastly, if the vertical bars are significant, you should maybe parse on
that character to harmonize the input to a subsequent stage ... but that's
just a guess, since I don't know wtf you are doing.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Rich Shepard 
wrote:

>   gawk-4.1.3 is installed here. According to Arnold Robbins' 'Effective awk
> Programming, 4th Ed',  page 154, the syntax for the switch statement is
> used
> in this code:
>
> # Get line length (number of fields)
> switch (NR) {
> case 36: # No shifts present.
> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $18, $19, $20, $21,
> $22, $23, $24, $25, $29, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36 }
> break
> case 37: # 1 shift present.
> { print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $19, $20, $21, $22,
> $23, $24, $25, $26, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37 }
> break
> case 38: # 2 shifts present.
> { print $1, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20, $21, $22, $23,
> $24, $25, $26, $27, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37, $38 }
> break
> case ?:
> break
> }
>
>   Running this code on data results in syntax errors:
>
> $ gawk -f trim-fields.awk test.dat > out
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: switch (NR) {
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: ^ syntax error
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: case 36: # No shifts present.
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: ^ syntax error
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: case 37: # 1 shift present.
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: ^ syntax error
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: case 38: # 2 shifts present.
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: ^ syntax error
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: case ?:
> gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: ^ syntax error
>
>   I'm sure it's a simple error on my part but I'm just not seeing the
> problem.
>
>   Test data set (test.dat) has lines with each length:
>
> 11/24/07 0400 12.12 |0400 2090 0.01| 12.10 12.10 12.04 12.08 12.12 12.12
> 12.10 12.06 1200 12.00 |1200 1930 0.01| 12.08 12.06 12.07 12.04 12.00 12.04
> 12.03 12.03 12.05 | 2000 2000 | 12.03 12.06 12.04 12.01 12.00 12.02 12.00
> 12.01
> 11/25/07  12.01 | 1950 0.01| 12.01 12.01 11.99 11.97 11.97 11.98
> 11.96 11.96 2400 11.87 |2400 1770 0.00| 11.97 11.95 11.95 11.95 11.93 11.91
> 11.93 11.93 11.95 | 1860 1860 | 11.96 11.97 11.93 11.93 11.91 11.89 11.89
> 11.90
> 11/26/07 1830 11.97 |1830 1890 | 11.87 11.87 11.90 11.90 11.89 11.86 11.87
> 11.81 0800 11.78 |0800 1680 0.00| 11.78 11.88 11.86 11.79 11.81 11.89 11.81
> 11.82 11.87 | 1770 1770 | 11.80 11.79 11.92 11.92 11.94 11.92 11.95 11.93
> 11/27/07 0230 12.05 |0230 1990 | 11.94 11.99 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04
> 12.03 2230 11.93 |2230 1840 | 12.03 12.02 12.02 11.98 11.95 11.97 11.96
> 11.95 11.98 | 1900 1900 | 11.94 11.94 11.94 11.96 11.97 11.97 11.94 11.93
> 11/28/07 2000 12.02 |2000 1950 | 11.94 11.92 11.91 11.92 11.90 11.88 11.88
> 11.86 1430 11.81 |1430 1710 | 11.85 11.85 11.86 11.86 11.85 11.82 11.82
> 11.83 11.89 | 1790 1790 | 11.86 11.86 11.87 11.90 12.02 12.00 11.90 11.91
>
>   I'm stuck (again) and I don't think this is a white space issue or an
> improper newline placement.
>
> Rich
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] gawk switch statement syntax errors

2018-07-23 Thread Rich Shepard

  gawk-4.1.3 is installed here. According to Arnold Robbins' 'Effective awk
Programming, 4th Ed',  page 154, the syntax for the switch statement is used
in this code:

# Get line length (number of fields)
switch (NR) {
case 36: # No shifts present.
{ print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $18, $19, $20, $21, $22, 
$23, $24, $25, $29, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36 }
break
case 37: # 1 shift present.
{ print $1, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $19, $20, $21, $22, $23, 
$24, $25, $26, $30, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37 }
break
case 38: # 2 shifts present.
{ print $1, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20, $21, $22, $23, $24, 
$25, $26, $27, $31, $32, $33, $34, $35, $36, $37, $38 }
break
case ?:
break
}

  Running this code on data results in syntax errors:

$ gawk -f trim-fields.awk test.dat > out
gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: switch (NR) {
gawk: trim-fields.awk:13: ^ syntax error
gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: case 36: # No shifts present.
gawk: trim-fields.awk:14: ^ syntax error
gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: case 37: # 1 shift present.
gawk: trim-fields.awk:17: ^ syntax error
gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: case 38: # 2 shifts present.
gawk: trim-fields.awk:20: ^ syntax error
gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: case ?:
gawk: trim-fields.awk:23: ^ syntax error

  I'm sure it's a simple error on my part but I'm just not seeing the
problem.

  Test data set (test.dat) has lines with each length:

11/24/07 0400 12.12 |0400 2090 0.01| 12.10 12.10 12.04 12.08 12.12 12.12 12.10 
12.06 1200 12.00 |1200 1930 0.01| 12.08 12.06 12.07 12.04 12.00 12.04 12.03 
12.03 12.05 | 2000 2000 | 12.03 12.06 12.04 12.01 12.00 12.02 12.00 12.01
11/25/07  12.01 | 1950 0.01| 12.01 12.01 11.99 11.97 11.97 11.98 11.96 
11.96 2400 11.87 |2400 1770 0.00| 11.97 11.95 11.95 11.95 11.93 11.91 11.93 
11.93 11.95 | 1860 1860 | 11.96 11.97 11.93 11.93 11.91 11.89 11.89 11.90
11/26/07 1830 11.97 |1830 1890 | 11.87 11.87 11.90 11.90 11.89 11.86 11.87 
11.81 0800 11.78 |0800 1680 0.00| 11.78 11.88 11.86 11.79 11.81 11.89 11.81 
11.82 11.87 | 1770 1770 | 11.80 11.79 11.92 11.92 11.94 11.92 11.95 11.93
11/27/07 0230 12.05 |0230 1990 | 11.94 11.99 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04 
12.03 2230 11.93 |2230 1840 | 12.03 12.02 12.02 11.98 11.95 11.97 11.96 11.95 
11.98 | 1900 1900 | 11.94 11.94 11.94 11.96 11.97 11.97 11.94 11.93
11/28/07 2000 12.02 |2000 1950 | 11.94 11.92 11.91 11.92 11.90 11.88 11.88 
11.86 1430 11.81 |1430 1710 | 11.85 11.85 11.86 11.86 11.85 11.82 11.82 11.83 
11.89 | 1790 1790 | 11.86 11.86 11.87 11.90 12.02 12.00 11.90 11.91

  I'm stuck (again) and I don't think this is a white space issue or an
improper newline placement.

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug