Re: How to add an ssd drive?

2015-10-06 Thread Brian Cluff
If you just want to outright replace the existing drive, it super easy, 
just get a SATA SSD and the drive pops out the left side of the machine 
with just one screw.
If you would like to keep the 500Gig drive and use it for bulk storage 
as well as a smaller SSD for the system it is only slightly harder.
It also requires the removal of 1 screw.  Just take out the screw from 
the plate on the bottom and it will snap out.  Then there is a slot next 
to the RAM that the mSATA drive clicks into.  Just make sure that you 
move the antenna wires out of the way before you put the bottom plate 
back on and you are done.  I recommend using a piece of tape to hold the 
antenna wires in place.  If you find that there is a card in there 
already, it is probably a mobile Internet card which my guess is that 
you will probably not be using.  Just pull the antenna wires off it and 
remove it.


The T420 can hold a total of 4 hard drive.  1 SATA in the HD slot. 1 
mSATA, 1 regular SATA in the DVD drive bay, that requires the purchase 
of a tray, and 1 SSD in the express card slot.  Technically you could 
count a large SD card as a 5th drive if you really wanted.  Pretty good 
expandability for such a small computer.


Brian Cluff

On 10/06/2015 05:34 PM, j...@actionline.com wrote:

Brian Cluff last wrote:

You'll enjoy that Laptop a lot. I just picked up a T420 myself
a few weeks ago and everything works perfect right out of the box.
I did add 8 gigs of ram for a total of 12 and installed a 240Gig
mSATA SSD ... an addition to the 320 Gig spinning drive that
I put /home on, and that made a huge difference in the speed
of all the apps loading.

How difficult is it to add an SSD?

I really don't need the 500-gig HD that is in this T420
that I just bought. On my old net-top system, df shows this:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5   15307020  6231552   8307468  43% /
udev 10207084   1020704   1% /dev
tmpfs 412276 1060411216   1% /run
none51200  5120   0% /run/lock
none 103068021072   1009608   3% /run/shm
/dev/sda6   71559236 26600696  41374540  40% /home

Instead of flushing the 500-gig HD, could I just install
a 64-gig or 128-gig SSD and install Linux on that and leave
the 500-gig unused? I don't need to bother with dual boot.

I looked on Amazon and saw these:

Transcend 64GB SATA III 6Gb/s MSA370 mSATA Solid State Drive
(TS64GMSA370) by Transcend $39.99 Prime

MyDigitalSSD 128GB 50mm Bullet Proof 4 BP4 50mm mSATA
Solid State Drive SSD SATA III 6G - MDMS-BP4-120
by MyDigitalSSD $55.00 Prime or $44.95 used (3 offers)

Also, what is the best way to install Linux Mint 17.2?

I downloaded linuxmint-17.2-mate-32bit.iso but the size
is 1,572,864,000 so I can't burn that onto a dvd to
install it.



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: How to add an ssd drive?

2015-10-06 Thread Rusty Ramser
"How difficult is it to add an SSD?"
No difference at all to installing to a HDD, in my experience.

"Instead of flushing the 500-gig HD, could I just install a 64-gig or
128-gig SSD and install Linux on that and leave the 500-gig unused?"
Shouldn't be any issue at all to do that.  Do you have a system that can
accept two HDDs (or SSDs), and you plan to keep both of them
installed/inserted at the same time?  Probably the easiest thing to do is
remove the HDD and put the SSD into that bay.  Get the system installed onto
the SSD without the HDD installed.  If you need/want to put that HDD back in
the system, use the secondary bay and leave your newly installed SSD in the
original/primary bay.

"Also, what is the best way to install Linux Mint 17.2?"
Burn the ISO to a USB drive; it's the only way to fly.  (Many laptops don't
even have a CD/DVD drive installed these days.)


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of
j...@actionline.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 20:35
To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
Subject: How to add an ssd drive? 

Brian Cluff last wrote:
> You'll enjoy that Laptop a lot. I just picked up a T420 myself a few 
> weeks ago and everything works perfect right out of the box.
> I did add 8 gigs of ram for a total of 12 and installed a 240Gig mSATA 
> SSD ... an addition to the 320 Gig spinning drive that I put /home on, 
> and that made a huge difference in the speed of all the apps loading.

How difficult is it to add an SSD?

I really don't need the 500-gig HD that is in this T420 that I just bought.
On my old net-top system, df shows this:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5   15307020  6231552   8307468  43% /
udev 10207084   1020704   1% /dev
tmpfs 412276 1060411216   1% /run
none51200  5120   0% /run/lock
none 103068021072   1009608   3% /run/shm
/dev/sda6   71559236 26600696  41374540  40% /home

Instead of flushing the 500-gig HD, could I just install a 64-gig or 128-gig
SSD and install Linux on that and leave the 500-gig unused? I don't need to
bother with dual boot.

I looked on Amazon and saw these:

Transcend 64GB SATA III 6Gb/s MSA370 mSATA Solid State Drive
(TS64GMSA370) by Transcend $39.99 Prime

MyDigitalSSD 128GB 50mm Bullet Proof 4 BP4 50mm mSATA Solid State Drive SSD
SATA III 6G - MDMS-BP4-120 by MyDigitalSSD $55.00 Prime or $44.95 used (3
offers)

Also, what is the best way to install Linux Mint 17.2?

I downloaded linuxmint-17.2-mate-32bit.iso but the size is 1,572,864,000 so
I can't burn that onto a dvd to install it.



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: How to add an ssd drive?

2015-10-06 Thread Stephen Partington
Looks like what I want to do for my wife's laptop
On Oct 6, 2015 5:41 PM,  wrote:

> Brian Cluff last wrote:
> > You'll enjoy that Laptop a lot. I just picked up a T420 myself
> > a few weeks ago and everything works perfect right out of the box.
> > I did add 8 gigs of ram for a total of 12 and installed a 240Gig
> > mSATA SSD ... an addition to the 320 Gig spinning drive that
> > I put /home on, and that made a huge difference in the speed
> > of all the apps loading.
>
> How difficult is it to add an SSD?
>
> I really don't need the 500-gig HD that is in this T420
> that I just bought. On my old net-top system, df shows this:
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda5   15307020  6231552   8307468  43% /
> udev 10207084   1020704   1% /dev
> tmpfs 412276 1060411216   1% /run
> none51200  5120   0% /run/lock
> none 103068021072   1009608   3% /run/shm
> /dev/sda6   71559236 26600696  41374540  40% /home
>
> Instead of flushing the 500-gig HD, could I just install
> a 64-gig or 128-gig SSD and install Linux on that and leave
> the 500-gig unused? I don't need to bother with dual boot.
>
> I looked on Amazon and saw these:
>
> Transcend 64GB SATA III 6Gb/s MSA370 mSATA Solid State Drive
> (TS64GMSA370) by Transcend $39.99 Prime
>
> MyDigitalSSD 128GB 50mm Bullet Proof 4 BP4 50mm mSATA
> Solid State Drive SSD SATA III 6G - MDMS-BP4-120
> by MyDigitalSSD $55.00 Prime or $44.95 used (3 offers)
>
> Also, what is the best way to install Linux Mint 17.2?
>
> I downloaded linuxmint-17.2-mate-32bit.iso but the size
> is 1,572,864,000 so I can't burn that onto a dvd to
> install it.
>
>
>
> ---
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Keith Smith


Thanks Rusty for all your help!!



On 2015-10-06 09:57, Rusty Ramser wrote:

"Thank you for your help!!"
No worries, mate.  If I'm actually providing any help :) you're quite
welcome.


It sounds like to me you're wanting to use name-based virtual hosts on
Apache.  Like thus:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html

If you will have one public IP address for your multiple domains (aka, 
web

sites), then you will need an entry in an external DNS hoster for each.
Each domain DNS record will point to the same public IP address (your 
single

web server).  And then it will be up to your Apache server to see
www.wheresmycar.net, www.dogsmakingfaces.com, and 
www.localbeerspecials.com
serve up the appropriate web site.  (Note:  I'm just guessing that 
those are

the three web sites you're using; don't know for sure.)

Your web server's non-routable internal IP address shouldn't really 
ever
come into play during normal usage scenarios.  Sure, if you enter the 
IP
locally on your system you'll get the default page, but that's not 
really
what external users will ever do.  Once you have external DNS host 
records
set up for each domain, you should be able to test the name-based 
Apache

functionality.  Or, if you want to do that locally before advertising
external DNS addresses you should be able to make some temporary 
/etc/hosts
entries on your web server which all point to its non-routable IP, just 
as a

test.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:27
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thank you for your help!!

Cox provides the public / routable  IP  which is set on my router / 
modem.


I have a web server that servers several websites.  I use NAT for port
forwarding to that one box.

Without a DNS server, either local or external, how will Apache know 
which

site to server up?  If I put the IP in my browser I get the default
"website" which is no website at all - it is the default welcome page.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:10
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I'm not sure that's a valid assumption, regarding needing a DNS server 
even
with that functionality.  Maybe it is in your specific use, but it 
doesn't

strike me as a guaranteed necessity.

The learning aspect of it, however, is something I can't debate.  If 
that's

part of your goals, then by all means run wild with it.  :)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:03
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I assume I need a DNS server since the box is a web server and will be
hosting a couple websites and there will be email as well.  And part of 
the

reason I am doing this is to learn.



-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to 
look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information 
(from

Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web 
traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on 
your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't 
just

point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 
443,

53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable 
IP?


Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing

How to add an ssd drive?

2015-10-06 Thread joe
Brian Cluff last wrote:
> You'll enjoy that Laptop a lot. I just picked up a T420 myself
> a few weeks ago and everything works perfect right out of the box.
> I did add 8 gigs of ram for a total of 12 and installed a 240Gig
> mSATA SSD ... an addition to the 320 Gig spinning drive that
> I put /home on, and that made a huge difference in the speed
> of all the apps loading.

How difficult is it to add an SSD?

I really don't need the 500-gig HD that is in this T420
that I just bought. On my old net-top system, df shows this:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5   15307020  6231552   8307468  43% /
udev 10207084   1020704   1% /dev
tmpfs 412276 1060411216   1% /run
none51200  5120   0% /run/lock
none 103068021072   1009608   3% /run/shm
/dev/sda6   71559236 26600696  41374540  40% /home

Instead of flushing the 500-gig HD, could I just install
a 64-gig or 128-gig SSD and install Linux on that and leave
the 500-gig unused? I don't need to bother with dual boot.

I looked on Amazon and saw these:

Transcend 64GB SATA III 6Gb/s MSA370 mSATA Solid State Drive
(TS64GMSA370) by Transcend $39.99 Prime

MyDigitalSSD 128GB 50mm Bullet Proof 4 BP4 50mm mSATA
Solid State Drive SSD SATA III 6G - MDMS-BP4-120
by MyDigitalSSD $55.00 Prime or $44.95 used (3 offers)

Also, what is the best way to install Linux Mint 17.2?

I downloaded linuxmint-17.2-mate-32bit.iso but the size
is 1,572,864,000 so I can't burn that onto a dvd to
install it.



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: What is your system advice? Solved.

2015-10-06 Thread Brian Cluff
You'll enjoy that Laptop a lot.  I just picked up a T420 myself a few 
weeks ago and everything works perfect right out of the box.  I did add 
8 gigs of ram for a total of 12Gig and installed a 240Gig mSATA SSD that 
I installed the system on and that's an addition to the 320 Gig spinning 
drive that I put /home on, and that made a huge difference in the speed 
of all the apps loading.


It's nice having a laptop that doesn't weigh a million pounds.  I picked 
it up so that I would have something light(er) to take to SCaLE, but I 
have to admit that I'm hauling it all over the place because of it's 
size (compared to the monsters that I usually use).


Brian Cluff

On 10/06/2015 04:02 PM, j...@actionline.com wrote:

Thanks again for all the helpful input in response to my
recent question: "What is your advice to update my system?"

After much research, I finally decided that, for my needs, the best
option was a used T420 Thinkpad. I've had excellent results with IBM
Thinkpads and never had one fail. Now they are all Lenovo, of course; and
I found one from a private party on Craigslist for $200 that looks
absolutely brand new, like it has never been used, and with 8-Gb RAM.

Lots of them on ebay for as little as $99 with no OS and priced all over
the map up to $500 and even more.

Now just need to flush the 500-gig hard drive and install Linux Mint and
I should be good to go for the next 5 years or longer.



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: What is your system advice? Solved.

2015-10-06 Thread joe
Thanks again for all the helpful input in response to my
recent question: "What is your advice to update my system?"

After much research, I finally decided that, for my needs, the best
option was a used T420 Thinkpad. I've had excellent results with IBM
Thinkpads and never had one fail. Now they are all Lenovo, of course; and
I found one from a private party on Craigslist for $200 that looks
absolutely brand new, like it has never been used, and with 8-Gb RAM.

Lots of them on ebay for as little as $99 with no OS and priced all over
the map up to $500 and even more.

Now just need to flush the 500-gig hard drive and install Linux Mint and
I should be good to go for the next 5 years or longer.



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Rusty Ramser
"Thank you for your help!!"
No worries, mate.  If I'm actually providing any help :) you're quite
welcome.


It sounds like to me you're wanting to use name-based virtual hosts on
Apache.  Like thus:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html

If you will have one public IP address for your multiple domains (aka, web
sites), then you will need an entry in an external DNS hoster for each.
Each domain DNS record will point to the same public IP address (your single
web server).  And then it will be up to your Apache server to see
www.wheresmycar.net, www.dogsmakingfaces.com, and www.localbeerspecials.com
serve up the appropriate web site.  (Note:  I'm just guessing that those are
the three web sites you're using; don't know for sure.)

Your web server's non-routable internal IP address shouldn't really ever
come into play during normal usage scenarios.  Sure, if you enter the IP
locally on your system you'll get the default page, but that's not really
what external users will ever do.  Once you have external DNS host records
set up for each domain, you should be able to test the name-based Apache
functionality.  Or, if you want to do that locally before advertising
external DNS addresses you should be able to make some temporary /etc/hosts
entries on your web server which all point to its non-routable IP, just as a
test.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:27
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thank you for your help!!

Cox provides the public / routable  IP  which is set on my router / modem.

I have a web server that servers several websites.  I use NAT for port
forwarding to that one box.

Without a DNS server, either local or external, how will Apache know which
site to server up?  If I put the IP in my browser I get the default
"website" which is no website at all - it is the default welcome page.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:10
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I'm not sure that's a valid assumption, regarding needing a DNS server even
with that functionality.  Maybe it is in your specific use, but it doesn't
strike me as a guaranteed necessity.

The learning aspect of it, however, is something I can't debate.  If that's
part of your goals, then by all means run wild with it.  :)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:03
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I assume I need a DNS server since the box is a web server and will be
hosting a couple websites and there will be email as well.  And part of the
reason I am doing this is to learn.



-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

>From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information (from
Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't just
point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 443,
53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable IP?

Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 10.x.x.x,
192.168.x

RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Keith Smith



Thank you for your help!!

Cox provides the public / routable  IP  which is set on my router / 
modem.


I have a web server that servers several websites.  I use NAT for port 
forwarding to that one box.


Without a DNS server, either local or external, how will Apache know 
which site to server up?  If I put the IP in my browser I get the 
default "website" which is no website at all - it is the default welcome 
page.





On 2015-10-06 09:10, Rusty Ramser wrote:
I'm not sure that's a valid assumption, regarding needing a DNS server 
even
with that functionality.  Maybe it is in your specific use, but it 
doesn't

strike me as a guaranteed necessity.

The learning aspect of it, however, is something I can't debate.  If 
that's

part of your goals, then by all means run wild with it.  :)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:03
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I assume I need a DNS server since the box is a web server and will be
hosting a couple websites and there will be email as well.  And part of 
the

reason I am doing this is to learn.



-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to 
look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information 
(from

Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web 
traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on 
your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't 
just

point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 
443,

53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable 
IP?


Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  
For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 
10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems 
need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, 
you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously 
Cox (or

any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then 
there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an 
"environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web 
server

doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox 
configures the

IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To 
subscribe,

unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


--
Keith Smith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change yo

RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Rusty Ramser
I'm not sure that's a valid assumption, regarding needing a DNS server even
with that functionality.  Maybe it is in your specific use, but it doesn't
strike me as a guaranteed necessity.

The learning aspect of it, however, is something I can't debate.  If that's
part of your goals, then by all means run wild with it.  :)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 12:03
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

I assume I need a DNS server since the box is a web server and will be
hosting a couple websites and there will be email as well.  And part of the
reason I am doing this is to learn.



-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

>From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information (from
Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't just
point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 443,
53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable IP?

Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously Cox (or
any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an "environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web server
doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox configures the
IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Keith Smith

On 2015-10-06 08:52, Rusty Ramser wrote:

From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to 
look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information 
(from

Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web 
traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on 
your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't 
just

point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)




I assume I need a DNS server since the box is a web server and will be 
hosting a couple websites and there will be email as well.  And part of 
the reason I am doing this is to learn.




Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 
443,

53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable 
IP?


Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty 
Ramser

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  
For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 
10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems 
need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, 
you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously 
Cox (or

any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then 
there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an 
"environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web 
server

doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox 
configures the

IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To 
subscribe,

unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


--
Keith Smith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Rusty Ramser
>From the scenario you describe, no, I don't see that creating your own
reverse lookup zone would be necessary.

Your web server has no other internal systems in your environment to look
up.  And for external reverse lookups using the public information (from
Cox, Google, OpenDNS, or whatever your preference) should be fine.  I
wouldn't create something that would just require extra
management/maintenance when there's no real use case for it.

(Actually, for just a single box that is only accepting NATed web traffic,
I'm not even sure I understand the need for a forward lookup zone on your
server.  Is there some reason that its client DNS configuration can't just
point to your preferred DNS provider?  Do you really need a DNS server
functioning on the box?)

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:14
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 443,
53... etc.

So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable IP?

Thanks!!
Keith


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Ramser
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:05
To: 'Main PLUG discussion list' 
Subject: RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously Cox (or
any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an "environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web server
doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup


Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox configures the
IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Keith Smith


Thanks Rusty.

It is one box.  It is on a non-routable IP.  I use NAT for ports 80, 
443, 53... etc.


So are you saying I need to make a reverse lookup for the non-routable 
IP?


Thanks!!
Keith


On 2015-10-06 08:04, Rusty Ramser wrote:

Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  
For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 
10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems 
need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, 
you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously 
Cox (or

any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then 
there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an 
"environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web 
server

doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith 
Smith

Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup



Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox 
configures the

IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To 
subscribe,

unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


--
Keith Smith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Rusty Ramser
Hi, Keith.

Will your environment be needing to do internal lookups based upon IP?  For
instance, are you using a non-routable set of IP addresses (e.g., 10.x.x.x,
192.168.x.x) for your environment behind NAT, and will those systems need to
perform name resolution of each other based upon IP?  If so, yes, you'll
want to have your own internal reverse lookup zone because obviously Cox (or
any other public DNS provider) will not have that information.

If you really don't need any internal reverse name resolution, then there
may be no need to create a zone.  For instance, there isn't an "environment"
of servers you have, it's just this single web server.  And the web server
doesn't have any internal network it sits on, it's just got a public,
routable IP address.

Cheers.


-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Keith Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:11
To: Main PLUG discussion list 
Subject: Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup



Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox configures the
IP reverse lookup.

Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Bind9 / Cox reverse lookup

2015-10-06 Thread Keith Smith



Hi,

I'm configuring Bind9 on my web server connected to Cox.  Cox configures 
the IP reverse lookup.


Do I still need to create a reverse zone file?

The reverse zone file is to lookup the host by IP correct?

Thank you for your help!!

Keith
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss