OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Technomage
I found this site 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement) to be 
rather illuminating,
especially with regard to free software.

However, this part scares me more than anything:



  United States

Knowledge Ecology International 
/wiki/Knowledge_Ecology_International also filed a Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) 
/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29 request in the 
United States but had their entire request denied, with the United State 
Trade Representative's FOIA office stating it was withheld for being 
material properly classified in the interest of national security. 
However, a recent leak has shown that the Obama administration intends 
to start an undisclosed internet chapter.^[41] #cite_note-HuffPo-40

^Comments?

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Ryan Rix
Hi,

The **ONLY** source of said leak so far has been one Micheal Geist, with 
absolutely no other sources. EVERYTHING links back to him. As such I have a 
very hard time not reading this without a grain of salt.

Ryan

Technomage wrote:
 I found this site
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement) to be
 rather illuminating,
 especially with regard to free software.
 
 However, this part scares me more than anything:
 
 
 
   United States
 
 Knowledge Ecology International
 /wiki/Knowledge_Ecology_International also filed a Freedom of
 Information Act (FOIA)
 /wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29 request in the
 United States but had their entire request denied, with the United State
 Trade Representative's FOIA office stating it was withheld for being
 material properly classified in the interest of national security.
 However, a recent leak has shown that the Obama administration intends
 to start an undisclosed internet chapter.^[41] #cite_note-HuffPo-40
 
 ^Comments?

-- 
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat Writer

Please refrain from mailing me directly in replies, I am subsribing 
via GMane NNTP. Thank you.

http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonale...@gmail.com  | MSN: phrkonale...@yahoo.com
AIM:  phrkonaleash| Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC:  phrkon...@irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
  countless other FOSS channels.


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


HackFest Schedule Changes to First Tuesday of Every Month 6:30PM - 8:30PM @ John C. Lincoln Cowden Center Rm #1AB

2009-11-10 Thread Lisa Kachold
The Phoenix Linux User Group Security Lab monthly presentation meetings have
moved to the first Tuesday of every month at 6:30PM until 8:30PM @ John C.
Lincoln Cowden Center Room #1AB

Here are the dates:
December 1, Tuesday
January 5, Tuesday
February 2, Tuesday
March 2, Tuesday

*9202 N 2nd 
St*http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=sll=37.0625,-95.677068sspn=41.411029,74.794922ie=UTF8geocode=FeU8AAIdSulR-Qsplit=0[image:
unstarred]
Phoenix, AZ 85020

Campus Map: http://www.jcl.com/AssetMgmt/getDocument.aspx?assetid=2180

Map: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=engeocode=q=9202+N.+Second+St
.,+phoenix+azsll=37.0625,-95.677068sspn=41.411029,74.794922ie=UTF8z=16iwloc=addr

Website: http://plug.phoenix.az.us/node/2068

Buy hackfester Tees:
https://www.it-clowns.com/v/index.php?main_page=product_infocPath=2products_id=5
-- 
Skype: (623)239-3392
ATT: (503)754-4452
www.it-clowns.com
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Lisa Kachold
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Technomage technomage.ha...@gmail.comwrote:

 I found this site
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement) to be
 rather illuminating,
 especially with regard to free software.

 However, this part scares me more than anything:
 


  United States

 Knowledge Ecology International
 /wiki/Knowledge_Ecology_International also filed a Freedom of
 Information Act (FOIA)
 /wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29 request in the
 United States but had their entire request denied, with the United State
 Trade Representative's FOIA office stating it was withheld for being
 material properly classified in the interest of national security.
 However, a recent leak has shown that the Obama administration intends
 to start an undisclosed internet chapter.^[41] #cite_note-HuffPo-40

 ^Comments?


Feifdom, serfdom, freedumnever trust words with a dum on the end.
The only freedom we have is through responsibility.  -John Trudel
-- 
Skype: (623)239-3392
ATT: (503)754-4452
www.it-clowns.com
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Help, my Xserver just died!

2009-11-10 Thread Mark Phillips
I performed an apt-get update/upgrade on my Debian testing machine, and now
my X server is dead. This is the error I got:

X.Org X Server 1.6.5
Release Date: 2009-10-11
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.30.8-dsa-ia32 i686 Debian
Current Operating System: Linux beagle 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 26
01:16:22 UTC 2009 i686
Build Date: 13 October 2009  11:25:51AM
xorg-server 2:1.6.5-1 (bui...@murphy.debian.org)
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Tue Nov 10 11:35:36 2009
/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libpciaccess.so.0: undefined
symbol: gzopen64

I googled the last line and did not find anything relevant or any solution.

Has anyone seen this problem before, and hopefully, a solution?

Thanks!

Mark
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Help, my Xserver just died!

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Cope
is your machine a 64bit machine? gzopen64 makes it sound like a 64bit
binary...

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mark Phillips
m...@phillipsmarketing.bizwrote:

 I performed an apt-get update/upgrade on my Debian testing machine, and now
 my X server is dead. This is the error I got:

 X.Org X Server 1.6.5
 Release Date: 2009-10-11
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.30.8-dsa-ia32 i686 Debian
 Current Operating System: Linux beagle 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 26
 01:16:22 UTC 2009 i686
 Build Date: 13 October 2009  11:25:51AM
 xorg-server 2:1.6.5-1 (bui...@murphy.debian.org)
 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
 to make sure that you have the latest version.
 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
 (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Tue Nov 10 11:35:36 2009
 /usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libpciaccess.so.0: undefined
 symbol: gzopen64

 I googled the last line and did not find anything relevant or any solution.

 Has anyone seen this problem before, and hopefully, a solution?

 Thanks!

 Mark

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- 
Eric Cope
http://cope-et-al.com
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Help, my Xserver just died!

2009-11-10 Thread JD Austin
Try apt-cache search gzopen to see if you can resolve the dependency.  You
may need to add a repository.
JD

On Nov 10, 2009 12:10 PM, Eric Cope eric.c...@gmail.com wrote:

is your machine a 64bit machine? gzopen64 makes it sound like a 64bit
binary...

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mark Phillips m...@phillipsmarketing.biz
wrote:

   I performed an apt-get update/upgrade on my Debian testing machine, and
 now my X server is dead
 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- 
Eric Cope
http://cope-et-al.com

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Help, my Xserver just died!

2009-11-10 Thread Mark Phillips
Eric,

No, just an old Pentium 32 bit machine. That is what is so strange.

However, I did manage to solve it by further digging on the ubuntu forums...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxml2/+bug/151045. I am not
running ubuntu, just debian.

The problem is with libz.so. In /usr/local/lib I have:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff  13 2007-11-01 17:39 /usr/local/lib/libz.so -
libz.so.1.2.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff  13 2007-11-01 17:39 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 -
libz.so.1.2.3
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 85K 2007-11-01 17:39 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.3

In /usr/lib I have:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 2009-08-13 16:37 /usr/lib/libz.so -
libz.so.1.2.3.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  15 2009-08-13 16:37 /usr/lib/libz.so.1 -
libz.so.1.2.3.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 80K 2009-08-04 11:54 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3

A newer version of libz is in /usr/lib as is in /usr/local/lib. I changed
/usr/local/lib to be:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff  24 2009-11-10 12:33 /usr/local/lib/libz.so -
/usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff  24 2009-11-10 12:34 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 -
/usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 85K 2007-11-01 17:39 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.3

and rebooted. X came up with no problems and gdm is puring along. I will see
what happens with the next update, but I will probably just cop
libz.so.1.2.3.3 over the libz.so.1.2.3 and put the links back.

Any ideas on how to figure out where the libz.so.1.2.3 got into
/usr/local/lib?

Mark

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Eric Cope eric.c...@gmail.com wrote:

 is your machine a 64bit machine? gzopen64 makes it sound like a 64bit
 binary...

 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mark Phillips 
 m...@phillipsmarketing.biz wrote:

 I performed an apt-get update/upgrade on my Debian testing machine, and
 now my X server is dead. This is the error I got:

 X.Org X Server 1.6.5
 Release Date: 2009-10-11
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.30.8-dsa-ia32 i686 Debian
 Current Operating System: Linux beagle 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 26
 01:16:22 UTC 2009 i686
 Build Date: 13 October 2009  11:25:51AM
 xorg-server 2:1.6.5-1 (bui...@murphy.debian.org)
 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
 to make sure that you have the latest version.
 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
 (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Tue Nov 10 11:35:36 2009
 /usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libpciaccess.so.0: undefined
 symbol: gzopen64

 I googled the last line and did not find anything relevant or any
 solution.

 Has anyone seen this problem before, and hopefully, a solution?

 Thanks!

 Mark

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




 --
 Eric Cope
 http://cope-et-al.com

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

OT: nano nitpick (triple negative) (was: Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software)

2009-11-10 Thread Mike Schwartz
OK,
[0] hard time,
times
[1] not reading
is -- so far -- a double negative.

I have no problem (ain't got no un-problem) with lots
of negatives, but I just think you meant the meaning,
that goes with an EVEN number of them here.

So, I think it should be
 with a grain of salt.
instead of
[2]  without a grain of salt.
because IMHO, [2] makes it a triple negative which -- has
the meaning 180 degrees from what it should be.

Don't get me wrong -- a quadruple negative would be fine here.
Just not an ODD number of negatives, since that has
the meaning off by a power of minus one
from what it should be.
Just my 0.02 (or, micro 2.0E+4),
-- 
Mike Schwartz
Glendale  AZ
schwa...@acm.org
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Ryan Rix phrkonale...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 The **ONLY** source of said leak so far has been one Micheal Geist, with
 absolutely no other sources. EVERYTHING links back to him. As such I have a
 very hard time not reading this without a grain of salt.

 Ryan

 Technomage wrote:
  I found this site
  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement) to be
  rather illuminating,
  especially with regard to free software.
 
  However, this part scares me more than anything:
  
 [...]
 
  ^Comments?

 --
 Ryan Rix
 Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat Writer

 Please refrain from mailing me directly in replies, I am subsribing
 via GMane NNTP. Thank you.

 http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
 XMPP: phrkonale...@gmail.com  | MSN: phrkonale...@yahoo.com
 AIM:  phrkonaleash| Yahoo: phrkonaleash
 IRC:  phrkon...@irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
  countless other FOSS channels.


 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discusshttp://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: OT: nano nitpick (triple negative) (was: Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software)

2009-11-10 Thread Ryan Rix
Vim  Nano

Mike Schwartz wrote:

 OK,
 [0] hard time,
 times
 [1] not reading
 is -- so far -- a double negative.
 
 I have no problem (ain't got no un-problem) with lots
 of negatives, but I just think you meant the meaning,
 that goes with an EVEN number of them here.
 
 So, I think it should be
 with a grain of salt.
 instead of
 [2]  without a grain of salt.
 because IMHO, [2] makes it a triple negative which -- has
 the meaning 180 degrees from what it should be.
 
 Don't get me wrong -- a quadruple negative would be fine here.
 Just not an ODD number of negatives, since that has
 the meaning off by a power of minus one
 from what it should be.
 Just my 0.02 (or, micro 2.0E+4),

-- 
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat Writer

Please refrain from mailing me directly in replies, I am subsribing 
via GMane NNTP. Thank you.

http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonale...@gmail.com  | MSN: phrkonale...@yahoo.com
AIM:  phrkonaleash| Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC:  phrkon...@irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
  countless other FOSS channels.


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Technomage
Interesting.

btw, if you have such a hard time accepting this, I invite you to file 
your own FOIA paperwork
and see if you get the requested documents. IF you do, then we all win.


Ryan Rix wrote:
 Hi,

 The **ONLY** source of said leak so far has been one Micheal Geist, with 
 absolutely no other sources. EVERYTHING links back to him. As such I have a 
 very hard time not reading this without a grain of salt.

 Ryan

   

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Lisa Kachold
Right, I believe I got the typical response sometime after 2001.  I have the
form letter, if you would like to have me scan it in.

After many years working in IT for the U.S. Army, Veterans Administration,
U.S.Bank/KeyBank, Telecoms, Nike, ISP's and many ECommerce firms and
start-ups, I don't disagree with the process of keeping information private,
just the vague wording of the letter, but that subject is not exactly
on-topic.

A long political discussion need not begin:

#end

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Technomage technomage.ha...@gmail.comwrote:

 Interesting.

 btw, if you have such a hard time accepting this, I invite you to file
 your own FOIA paperwork
 and see if you get the requested documents. IF you do, then we all win.


 Ryan Rix wrote:
  Hi,
 
  The **ONLY** source of said leak so far has been one Micheal Geist, with
  absolutely no other sources. EVERYTHING links back to him. As such I have
 a
  very hard time not reading this without a grain of salt.
 
  Ryan
 
 

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- 
Skype: (623)239-3392
ATT: (503)754-4452
www.it-clowns.com
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Samba/Ubuntu in a windows network OR How to break your network in 3 easy steps....

2009-11-10 Thread Sean Parsons
I am actively trying to join a server running Ubuntu server 9.04 to my
windows Ad domain as a Samba file server. I was directed to several how tos
and after many hours of trying to figure things out, my windows AD/Kerberos
faulted and my network went down, and yes I have backups... I'll get it
fixed, but I'd like to figure out what went wrong, and how something like
this could happen.

 

My final goal is to replace all/most of my windows servers with Linux
equivalents, and although I'm competent in Windows, I am little better than
a newbie when it comes to Linux. I've reached the stage where I can really
break something if I try.. J

 

I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss my situation with someone who
has experience and can possibly identify what steps I need and what I should
avoid in the future... 

 

Thanks

 

Sean Parsons

 

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Samba/Ubuntu in a windows network OR How to break your network in 3 easy steps....

2009-11-10 Thread JD Austin
Install webmin; it has a nice web interface to administer Samba.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Sean Parsons s...@theparsonsfamily.comwrote:

  I am actively trying to join a server running Ubuntu server 9.04 to my
 windows Ad domain as a Samba file server. I was directed to several how tos
 and after many hours of trying to figure things out, my windows AD/Kerberos
 faulted and my network went down, and yes I have backups….. I’ll get it
 fixed, but I’d like to figure out what went wrong, and how something like
 this could happen.



 My final goal is to replace all/most of my windows servers with Linux
 equivalents, and although I’m competent in Windows, I am little better than
 a newbie when it comes to Linux. I’ve reached the stage where I can really
 break something if I try.. J



 I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss my situation with someone who
 has experience and can possibly identify what steps I need and what I should
 avoid in the future…..



 Thanks



 Sean Parsons



 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Samba/Ubuntu in a windows network OR How to break your network in 3 easy steps....

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Shubert
Sean Parsons wrote:
 I am actively trying to join a server running Ubuntu server 9.04 to my 
 windows Ad domain as a Samba file server. I was directed to several how 
 tos and after many hours of trying to figure things out, my windows 
 AD/Kerberos faulted and my network went down, and yes I have backups….. 
 I’ll get it fixed, but I’d like to figure out what went wrong, and how 
 something like this could happen.
 
 My final goal is to replace all/most of my windows servers with Linux 
 equivalents, and although I’m competent in Windows, I am little better 
 than a newbie when it comes to Linux. I’ve reached the stage where I can 
 really break something if I try.. J
 
 I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss my situation with someone 
 who has experience and can possibly identify what steps I need and what 
 I should avoid in the future…..
 
 Thanks
 
 Sean Parsons

I think I can help you out Sean. Feel free to contact me off list.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software

2009-11-10 Thread Technomage
Lisa,
My response was originally to Ryan regarding his initial response per my 
posting.

However, I can take your word for it that the FOIA response since sept 
2001 has been less than stellar.
Still, on an issue that affects even free and open software for 
governments to take something thats supposed to
be publically debated and accessible and make it a metter of national 
security makes me wonder what they
are really up to.

Clearly, the current administration is showing an aptitude for these 
kinds of secrecy games not seen since the
height of the cold war. There is something very wrong in the halls of 
power and it directly affects us all
in one form or another.

Lisa Kachold wrote:
 Right, I believe I got the typical response sometime after 2001.  I have the
 form letter, if you would like to have me scan it in.

 After many years working in IT for the U.S. Army, Veterans Administration,
 U.S.Bank/KeyBank, Telecoms, Nike, ISP's and many ECommerce firms and
 start-ups, I don't disagree with the process of keeping information private,
 just the vague wording of the letter, but that subject is not exactly
 on-topic.

 A long political discussion need not begin:

 #end

   

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


anyone done a ubuntu 9.10 upgrade yet?

2009-11-10 Thread Jerry Davis
I have used linux for many years, and I have found that upgrades in place
rarely work in the past.

Has anyone done a upgrade in place using the Update Manager for ubuntu 9.10?
Did it work?

Or would it be better to just create a tarball of my home directory, save it
off, download and burn the iso, and just do a full install?

-- 
Hobbit Name: Pimpernel Loamsdown
Registered Linux User: 275424
K7AZJ
 
This email's Fortune: 
If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


RE: OT: nano nitpick (triple negative) (was: Re: OT, ACTA, Secrecy and free software)

2009-11-10 Thread Bob Elzer
I don't pay no never mind to those things.  :-)
 

-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Ryan Rix
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:20 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: OT: nano nitpick (triple negative) (was: Re: OT, ACTA,Secrecy
and free software)

Vim  Nano

Mike Schwartz wrote:

 OK,
 [0] hard time,
 times
 [1] not reading
 is -- so far -- a double negative.
 
 I have no problem (ain't got no un-problem) with lots of negatives, 
 but I just think you meant the meaning, that goes with an EVEN number 
 of them here.
 
 So, I think it should be
 with a grain of salt.
 instead of
 [2]  without a grain of salt.
 because IMHO, [2] makes it a triple negative which -- has the meaning 
 180 degrees from what it should be.
 
 Don't get me wrong -- a quadruple negative would be fine here.
 Just not an ODD number of negatives, since that has the meaning off 
 by a power of minus one
 from what it should be.
 Just my 0.02 (or, micro 2.0E+4),

--
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat Writer

Please refrain from mailing me directly in replies, I am subsribing via
GMane NNTP. Thank you.

http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonale...@gmail.com  | MSN: phrkonale...@yahoo.com
AIM:  phrkonaleash| Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC:  phrkon...@irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
  countless other FOSS channels.


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: anyone done a ubuntu 9.10 upgrade yet?

2009-11-10 Thread Joshua Zeidner
  I downloaded the ISO and it would even install on a Tpad R40.  -jmz

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Jerry Davis jdaw...@cox.net wrote:
 I have used linux for many years, and I have found that upgrades in place
 rarely work in the past.

 Has anyone done a upgrade in place using the Update Manager for ubuntu 9.10?
 Did it work?

 Or would it be better to just create a tarball of my home directory, save it
 off, download and burn the iso, and just do a full install?

 --
 Hobbit Name: Pimpernel Loamsdown
 Registered Linux User: 275424
 K7AZJ

 This email's Fortune:
 If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: anyone done a ubuntu 9.10 upgrade yet?

2009-11-10 Thread Andrew Farris
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:09 -0700, Jerry Davis wrote:
 I have used linux for many years, and I have found that upgrades in place
 rarely work in the past.

I've had the opposite experience, for the most part... my main desktop
has been upgrading in-place since ubuntu 6.10 

 Has anyone done a upgrade in place using the Update Manager for ubuntu 9.10?
 Did it work?

On 3 of the 4 computer's I've done so far, the upgrade was flawless,
aside from the new firefox icon not automatically appearing. Of the
successful ones, 2 were AMD/nVidia-based desktops, both relatively new,
custom builds w/ Gigabyte mobos, and 1 was a Dell Inspiron 1545 w/
integrated Intel graphics. 

The computer that misbehaved slightly was my main desktop (which usually
misbehaves)... a slightly older (about 4-5 years now), but still custom
built, AMD/ATI box on an MSI mobo, with lots of extra hardware (webcam,
dual-head video, SB Audio deluxe sound card, Logitech G15 keyboard...).
The fglrx modules failed to build for the new kernel and I had to remove
them manually and replace them with the FOSS Radeon driver (which has
gotten a lot better since I last used it, imho), and the
flashplugin-installer broke, and I'm w/o flash atm because I haven't
bothered to fix it yet. Additionally after the first reboot X failed to
start automatically, and I had to login/startx myself. After the second
reboot though, everything worked as expected...just had to redo my
speaker config because I chose to overwrite the old pulseaudio
daemon.conf file during the upgrade. Other than that though, everything
seems to be working just fine.

 Or would it be better to just create a tarball of my home directory, save it
 off, download and burn the iso, and just do a full install?

I always back up the really important stuff anyway, but it's probably
not entirely needed anymore, unless you really want to. If you're
unsure/nervous though, just back everything up anyway and try the
upgrade. if it works, keep it and no harm done...if the upgrade doesn't
work like you want for whatever reason, do a fresh install and start
over.

Alternatively, you can always try downloading the alternate CD, and
upgrading from that. I usually do that for my laptops since I'm using
them on the go, and downloading the whole upgrade takes a pretty long
time. I didn't this time, but the last time I did with my old laptop
(which is still on 8.04 for an LTS-to-LTS upgrade test) it worked fine.

Hope that helps :)


-- 
Andrew
_
Registered Linux User: 473690
Registered Ubuntu User: 22747

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: anyone done a ubuntu 9.10 upgrade yet?

2009-11-10 Thread Jim March
Ext4 is one of the best new features, now fully stable.  It's worth
the clean install to get.

Jim
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: anyone done a ubuntu 9.10 upgrade yet?

2009-11-10 Thread Andrew Farris
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:30 -0700, Joseph Sinclair wrote:
 This depends on what you want out of the upgrade:
 For most desktop use, upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 is pretty smooth and
 painless, although you'll be stuck with the stupid chooser login, all
 of the other GDM options are gone.
[snip]

There's actually a ton of new ways to configure the new GDM, there's
just not a GUI to do it while logged into a session yet.

To customize the GUI:
 1. log out
 2. ctrl+alt+F1 to a tty terminal
 3. login, then run the following 2 commands:
 1. export DISPLAY=:0.0
 2. sudo -u gdm gnome-control-center
 4. ctrl+alt+F7 back to the gdm login, and rejoice at the menu
available
 5. Configure away. you can change the fonts/wallpaper of the gdm
screen from 'Appearences', as well as the window borders,
colors, etc
 6. If you're like me and have dual-screens, you can go to 'Display'
and configure them so they don't just mirror each-other.
 7. You can even enable basic desktop effects using metacity's
compositing feature, if you want to by going back to the TTY1,
and typing in sudo -u gdm gconf-editor, and editing
the /apps/metacity/compositing key

[snip]
 After install, use sudo apt-get purge update-manager update-notifier
 update-manager-core update-notifier-common to get rid of the
 pop-under stupidity in update manager (introduced in 9.04 and still
 present in 9.10).  

or... you could restore the traditional notification functionality of
update-manager by doing:
gconftool -s --type bool /apps/update-notifier/auto_launch false
as prescribed here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904

I agree that the update-manager popping up to tell you about updates is
very annoying and distracting... theres ALWAYS better ways to give
information to your users than popups (though I'll admit, the new
notify-osd system is pretty slick). 

hope that proves useful to you!



-- 
Andrew
_
Registered Linux User: 473690
Registered Ubuntu User: 22747

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss