Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-03-01 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 14:32 -0700, Stephen wrote:
 This is actually something i have been planning for a few weeks now...
 
 More incentive to set this up, but it will likely go on its on VM on
 my server than locally.
 
 Im not sure if i want to use DHCP on my server or DHCP on myGateway yet.
 

I have yet to see any appliance DHCP server approach the feature set you
get on a full ISC DHCP server including... dynamic dns, retention of
lease addresses (so they don't keep moving around), Windows specific
features, etc.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-03-01 Thread Eric Shubert
It seems to me that the gateway is a more logical place to put dhcp, 
thinking of your gateway as a network server (which provides network 
services).

To be honest though, I can't think of a reason why it would really 
matter one way or another.

Stephen wrote:
 This is actually something i have been planning for a few weeks now...
 
 More incentive to set this up, but it will likely go on its on VM on
 my server than locally.
 
 Im not sure if i want to use DHCP on my server or DHCP on myGateway yet.
 
 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

 Brian Cluff wrote:
 I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable.
 I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all.
 I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.

 Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever
 that people setup their own DNS servers.

 Brian Cluff

 On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver
 from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff


 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

 
 
 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-03-01 Thread Stephen
uptime etc... and the extra features is why im thinking about it.
however my gateway does dyndns, but im still wnating to replace it
with a real firewall and some of those features. but i dont have a
graceful replacement of the wireless part of it yet. so im kind of
stuck with it. (and i dont mind replacing it with tomato/DDwrt but i
want a backup plan first in case i brick it)

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 It seems to me that the gateway is a more logical place to put dhcp,
 thinking of your gateway as a network server (which provides network
 services).

 To be honest though, I can't think of a reason why it would really
 matter one way or another.

 Stephen wrote:
 This is actually something i have been planning for a few weeks now...

 More incentive to set this up, but it will likely go on its on VM on
 my server than locally.

 Im not sure if i want to use DHCP on my server or DHCP on myGateway yet.

 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

 Brian Cluff wrote:
 I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable.
 I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all.
 I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.

 Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever
 that people setup their own DNS servers.

 Brian Cluff

 On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver
 from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff


 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss






 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- 
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-03-01 Thread Eric Shubert
IPCop has worked well for me for a number of years. I started with an 
old 333MH celeron pc, added a couple nics, and was good to go. You 
wouldn't need that much power though. A plain ol' Pentium (win95 box) 
would do nicely. I run IPCop as a VM these days. I have my wireless 
router (wrt54G stock) attached to the orange (dmz) network, so wireless 
is isolated from my lan.

Stephen wrote:
 uptime etc... and the extra features is why im thinking about it.
 however my gateway does dyndns, but im still wnating to replace it
 with a real firewall and some of those features. but i dont have a
 graceful replacement of the wireless part of it yet. so im kind of
 stuck with it. (and i dont mind replacing it with tomato/DDwrt but i
 want a backup plan first in case i brick it)
 
 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 It seems to me that the gateway is a more logical place to put dhcp,
 thinking of your gateway as a network server (which provides network
 services).

 To be honest though, I can't think of a reason why it would really
 matter one way or another.

 Stephen wrote:
 This is actually something i have been planning for a few weeks now...

 More incentive to set this up, but it will likely go on its on VM on
 my server than locally.

 Im not sure if i want to use DHCP on my server or DHCP on myGateway yet.

 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

 Brian Cluff wrote:
 I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable.
 I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all.
 I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.

 Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever
 that people setup their own DNS servers.

 Brian Cluff

 On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver
 from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

 
 
 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-03-01 Thread Eric Shubert
VMware Server, CentOS 5.

Stephen wrote:
 Running as a vm, what platform do you run it on? (virtualbox, xen, vmware)
 
 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 IPCop has worked well for me for a number of years. I started with an
 old 333MH celeron pc, added a couple nics, and was good to go. You
 wouldn't need that much power though. A plain ol' Pentium (win95 box)
 would do nicely. I run IPCop as a VM these days. I have my wireless
 router (wrt54G stock) attached to the orange (dmz) network, so wireless
 is isolated from my lan.

 Stephen wrote:
 uptime etc... and the extra features is why im thinking about it.
 however my gateway does dyndns, but im still wnating to replace it
 with a real firewall and some of those features. but i dont have a
 graceful replacement of the wireless part of it yet. so im kind of
 stuck with it. (and i dont mind replacing it with tomato/DDwrt but i
 want a backup plan first in case i brick it)

 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 It seems to me that the gateway is a more logical place to put dhcp,
 thinking of your gateway as a network server (which provides network
 services).

 To be honest though, I can't think of a reason why it would really
 matter one way or another.

 Stephen wrote:
 This is actually something i have been planning for a few weeks now...

 More incentive to set this up, but it will likely go on its on VM on
 my server than locally.

 Im not sure if i want to use DHCP on my server or DHCP on myGateway yet.

 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

 Brian Cluff wrote:
 I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable.
 I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all.
 I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.

 Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever
 that people setup their own DNS servers.

 Brian Cluff

 On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back 
 the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that 
 nameserver
 from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

 
 
 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Steven A. DuChene

Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

-Original Message-
From: Brian Cluff br...@snaptek.com
Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the 
wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver 
from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.

Brian Cluff


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Brian Cluff
I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable. 
I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all. 
I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.

Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever 
that people setup their own DNS servers.

Brian Cluff

On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:

 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver
from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.

 Brian Cluff


 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just 
need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when 
you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is 
directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets 
your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a 
router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your 
computer isn't sitting on a public address.

I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't 
really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

Brian Cluff wrote:
 I've always found that cox's DNS server have been less that desirable. 
 I was actually surprised to find that I was using their dns at all. 
 I've usually setup my own, to get around their DNS problems.
 
 Now with cox hijacking all the typos, I would recommend more than ever 
 that people setup their own DNS servers.
 
 Brian Cluff
 
 On 02/28/2010 07:53 AM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluffbr...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion listplug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver
 from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 10:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just 
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when 
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is 
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets 
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a 
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your 
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.
 
 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't 
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)

in the configuration of your network adaptor, you can turn off DHCP
client changes to /etc/resolv.conf

PEERDNS = no

various ways to accomplish this depending upon whether you are using
NetworkManager or not, which distro, etc.

I thought ipcop provided dns forwarding to the DNS servers set up within
ipcop and didn't actually provide any DNS resolution by itself so if you
use DHCP on ipcop on a Cox connection, you are back on Cox's name
servers.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote:
 On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 10:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just 
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when 
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is 
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets 
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a 
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your 
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't 
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)
 
 in the configuration of your network adaptor, you can turn off DHCP
 client changes to /etc/resolv.conf
 
 PEERDNS = no
 
 various ways to accomplish this depending upon whether you are using
 NetworkManager or not, which distro, etc.

Sweet.

 I thought ipcop provided dns forwarding to the DNS servers set up within
 ipcop and didn't actually provide any DNS resolution by itself so if you
 use DHCP on ipcop on a Cox connection, you are back on Cox's name
 servers.
 
 Craig
 

That occurred to me after I posted the message. You're right. IPCop 
alone wouldn't typically fix the problem. I guess I'm not seeing the 
problem because I'm on DSL. ;)

For those on cox, might I suggest using opendns resolvers?
208.67.222.220
208.67.222.222
You'll need to do the PEERDNS = no thing to keep your settings from 
getting wiped out.

Thanks Craig. :)

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Good question. Did the sequence field perhaps not get updated on the 
authoritative DNS record?

Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, I am using cox but I guess the bigger question is WHY
 is cox reporting an incorrect IP for the plug web server?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Cluff br...@snaptek.com
 Sent: Feb 28, 2010 1:56 AM
 To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

 It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the 
 wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver 
from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.
 Brian Cluff


 ---

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Joseph Sinclair
Pretty much all DNS servers forward requests upstream.  The critical 
configuration is what is upstream.
If you want true results, the safest is to set the root nameserver anycasts as 
the upstream, but that's not nice, as it adds unwarranted load to the root 
servers, which are a limited global resource.

You can connect any system (DNS in IpCop, NAT router, local DNS server, or just 
the resolv.conf) to a variety of DNS services.  The tricky part is finding a 
reliable and trustworthy resolver besides the root nodes.

Most people connect to their ISP because DHCP sets it up.  If you're willing to 
type it in, though, there are several anycast DNS services available.
Google, for instance, runs a lighting fast public DNS at 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 
anycast that returns absolutely compliant results (including NXDOMAIN for 
failed lookups, instead of false results).

There are many other open resolvers.  Most do the same redirect-failure-to-ads 
trick that Cox is doing now, however.


Craig White wrote:
 On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 10:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
 Running your own caching resolver is pretty trivial on RHEL/Fedora. Just 
 need to install the caching-nameserver package (which pulls in deps when 
 you use yum to install it). You then need to have:
 nameserver 127.0.0.1
 first in your /etc/resolv.conf file so it gets used. If your computer is 
 directly attached to the cox modem, that'll be a pain as dhcp resets 
 your resolv.conf file. If you're using cox, you really should have a 
 router with nat between your computer and the cox modem though, so your 
 computer isn't sitting on a public address.

 I don't know off hand how to set up a local resolver on Ubuntu. I don't 
 really need one myself because my IPCop is my resolver. ;)
 
 in the configuration of your network adaptor, you can turn off DHCP
 client changes to /etc/resolv.conf
 
 PEERDNS = no
 
 various ways to accomplish this depending upon whether you are using
 NetworkManager or not, which distro, etc.
 
 I thought ipcop provided dns forwarding to the DNS servers set up within
 ipcop and didn't actually provide any DNS resolution by itself so if you
 use DHCP on ipcop on a Cox connection, you are back on Cox's name
 servers.
 
 Craig
 
 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Joseph Sinclair
Eric Shubert wrote:
 Craig White wrote:
 On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 10:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
 For those on cox, might I suggest using opendns resolvers?
 208.67.222.220
 208.67.222.222
 You'll need to do the PEERDNS = no thing to keep your settings from 
 getting wiped out.
 
 Thanks Craig. :)
 

OpenDNS is also redirecting failures to their ad servers now, which makes them 
the same as COX.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Joseph Sinclair wrote:
 Pretty much all DNS servers forward requests upstream.  The critical 
 configuration is what is upstream.
 If you want true results, the safest is to set the root nameserver anycasts 
 as the upstream, but that's not nice, as it adds unwarranted load to the root 
 servers, which are a limited global resource.
 
 You can connect any system (DNS in IpCop, NAT router, local DNS server, or 
 just the resolv.conf) to a variety of DNS services.  The tricky part is 
 finding a reliable and trustworthy resolver besides the root nodes.
 
 Most people connect to their ISP because DHCP sets it up.  If you're willing 
 to type it in, though, there are several anycast DNS services available.
 Google, for instance, runs a lighting fast public DNS at 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 
 anycast that returns absolutely compliant results (including NXDOMAIN for 
 failed lookups, instead of false results).
 
 There are many other open resolvers.  Most do the same 
 redirect-failure-to-ads trick that Cox is doing now, however.
 
 
Thanks for the explanation, Joseph.

Could you elaborate about the redirect-failure-to-ads trick? I don't 
know what you mean by that.

Also, do you happen to know if Qwest is also doing this?

Thanks again.
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Joseph Sinclair
Eric Shubert wrote:
 
 Could you elaborate about the redirect-failure-to-ads trick? I don't 
 know what you mean by that.
 
 Also, do you happen to know if Qwest is also doing this?
 
 Thanks again.

Most ISP and commercial DNS providers, when a domain name isn't found, do not 
return the mandated a NXDOMAIN response.
Instead they return the IP address of a server that just dumps a page full of 
ads based on the (presumably mistyped) domain name.
The immediate problem is that a completely innocent typo can then result in ads 
for almost anything (which can be *really* bad if a kid is doing the typing).

It's a dirty trick to try to turn DNS into a profit center, and I find it 
completely despicable.
DNS has to trustworthy or the whole trust model of the net fails, and any 
service that's willing to change NXDOMAIN responses for profit could just as 
easily start redirecting other traffic for even more profit (imagine if 
www.gnu.org got redirected to a MS anti-FOSS site when accessed from a Windows 
machine).

I don't know if QWest is doing that, but I would be mildly surprised if they 
aren't.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Brian Cluff
On 02/28/2010 02:27 PM, Joseph Sinclair wrote:
 Most ISP and commercial DNS providers, when a domain name isn't found, do not 
 return the mandated a NXDOMAIN response.
 Instead they return the IP address of a server that just dumps a page full of 
 ads based on the (presumably mistyped) domain name.
 The immediate problem is that a completely innocent typo can then result in 
 ads for almost anything (which can be *really* bad if a kid is doing the 
 typing).

 It's a dirty trick to try to turn DNS into a profit center, and I find it 
 completely despicable.


There is also the completely annoying side effect that your simple typo, 
that is probably only off by one letter, that could previously be easily 
corrected, now has to be completely re-typed from scratch.   For that 
reason alone, I would like to strangle the guy at cox who's bright idea 
it was to hijack typos.   It now means that when I'm trying to get 
someone to type in an address over the phone and they miss type it, we 
get to start completely over again... Yeay!.   It was already super fun 
getting them to not automatically add WWW to the beginning of the address.

Brian Cluff
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Brian Cluff
Your browser should be giving you an address not found message.  If bing 
is factoring into it, then your dns is being hijacked, or you have some 
sort of plugin that is redirecting your results.


Attached is what I get when I try putting in something with a bad address.

Brian Cluff

On 02/28/2010 03:24 PM, Steve Phariss wrote:

Who does cox redirect to?  I get the bing search page, and if it is not
found (i.e. truely a bad search) then BING gives me a not found page


On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Joseph Sinclair
plug-discuss...@stcaz.net mailto:plug-discuss...@stcaz.net wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:
 
  Could you elaborate about the redirect-failure-to-ads trick? I don't
  know what you mean by that.
 
  Also, do you happen to know if Qwest is also doing this?
 
  Thanks again.

Most ISP and commercial DNS providers, when a domain name isn't
found, do not return the mandated a NXDOMAIN response.
Instead they return the IP address of a server that just dumps a
page full of ads based on the (presumably mistyped) domain name.
The immediate problem is that a completely innocent typo can then
result in ads for almost anything (which can be *really* bad if a
kid is doing the typing).

It's a dirty trick to try to turn DNS into a profit center, and I
find it completely despicable.
DNS has to trustworthy or the whole trust model of the net fails,
and any service that's willing to change NXDOMAIN responses for
profit could just as easily start redirecting other traffic for even
more profit (imagine if www.gnu.org http://www.gnu.org got
redirected to a MS anti-FOSS site when accessed from a Windows machine).

I don't know if QWest is doing that, but I would be mildly surprised
if they aren't.


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


attachment: coxcrap.png---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Steven A. DuChene
Yes, but you will notice they call that an Enhanced Error Results Page
so that must be OK!  :-)


-Original Message-
From: Brian Cluff br...@snaptek.com
Sent: Feb 28, 2010 8:13 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

Your browser should be giving you an address not found message.  If bing 
is factoring into it, then your dns is being hijacked, or you have some 
sort of plugin that is redirecting your results.

Attached is what I get when I try putting in something with a bad address.

Brian Cluff

On 02/28/2010 03:24 PM, Steve Phariss wrote:
 Who does cox redirect to?  I get the bing search page, and if it is not
 found (i.e. truely a bad search) then BING gives me a not found page


 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Joseph Sinclair
 plug-discuss...@stcaz.net mailto:plug-discuss...@stcaz.net wrote:

 Eric Shubert wrote:
  
   Could you elaborate about the redirect-failure-to-ads trick? I don't
   know what you mean by that.
  
   Also, do you happen to know if Qwest is also doing this?
  
   Thanks again.

 Most ISP and commercial DNS providers, when a domain name isn't
 found, do not return the mandated a NXDOMAIN response.
 Instead they return the IP address of a server that just dumps a
 page full of ads based on the (presumably mistyped) domain name.
 The immediate problem is that a completely innocent typo can then
 result in ads for almost anything (which can be *really* bad if a
 kid is doing the typing).

 It's a dirty trick to try to turn DNS into a profit center, and I
 find it completely despicable.
 DNS has to trustworthy or the whole trust model of the net fails,
 and any service that's willing to change NXDOMAIN responses for
 profit could just as easily start redirecting other traffic for even
 more profit (imagine if www.gnu.org http://www.gnu.org got
 redirected to a MS anti-FOSS site when accessed from a Windows machine).

 I don't know if QWest is doing that, but I would be mildly surprised
 if they aren't.


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-28 Thread Brian Cluff
On 02/28/2010 09:26 PM, Steven A. DuChene wrote:
 Yes, but you will notice they call that an Enhanced Error Results Page
 so that must be OK!  :-)

A... hadn't noticed that wording... everything is OK now... 
everyone, false alarm!  False alarm everyone...  This is an enhanced 
error page.  I totally missed that before, which is probably forgivable 
since I was too busy feeling skull #@(%) by cox to notice that it was 
actually a good thing.  Glad you pointed that out.

I feel so much better now.

:)

Brian Cluff
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-27 Thread Steven A. DuChene
I have been trying to get to the web site this morning to find
more information about the install fest but the PLUG website
seems to be DOA.

-Original Message-

From: Dazed_75 

Sent: Feb 25, 2010 11:49 PM

To: Main PLUG discussion list 

Subject: Installfest this Saturday



We will be in room 204

http://plug.phoenix.az.us/ for details

-- 
Dazed_75 a.k.a. Larry

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, 
that I wish it always to be kept alive.

  - Thomas Jefferson


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-27 Thread Dazed_75
Are you using IE6?  Seems like a lot of web sites are seeming DOA to IE6
lately.  I've gone to the plug website several times per day the last three
days and from different computers with no problems including just now using
the link in your email from the part which quoted my previous reply.

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Steven A. DuChene 
linux-clust...@mindspring.com wrote:

 I have been trying to get to the web site this morning to find
 more information about the install fest but the PLUG website
 seems to be DOA.

 -Original Message-

 From: Dazed_75

 Sent: Feb 25, 2010 11:49 PM

 To: Main PLUG discussion list

 Subject: Installfest this Saturday



 We will be in room 204

 http://plug.phoenix.az.us/ for details

 --
 Dazed_75 a.k.a. Larry

 The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions,
 that I wish it always to be kept alive.

  - Thomas Jefferson


 ---
 PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
 http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- 
Dazed_75 a.k.a. Larry

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions,
that I wish it always to be kept alive.
 - Thomas Jefferson
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Re: Installfest this Saturday - PLUG website dead?

2010-02-27 Thread Brian Cluff
It looks like the cox name server at 68.105.29.12 is reporting back the 
wrong address for the plug server.  If you simply remove that nameserver 
from your resolv.conf, you should be able to get to the server again.

Brian Cluff


---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss