Re: [SlimDevices: Plugins] Using PC vs NAT for Server
epoch1970 wrote: > Welcome to the forums. > You should have posted in "3rd party hardware" rather than here. This is > the forum to discuss server plugins. > > Anyways. > > These days, I think a lot of users have opted for a Raspberry Pi or > equivalent (+USB HDD) as their LMS platform. 24/7 availability, low > power consumption, good performance. > Running LMS on a NAS is usually more difficult than on a PC/server > because a NAS typically uses a closed OS, making LMS install or > maintenance more complex. > > HTH epoch, sorry my bad. Thanks for the comment. ---- bill77056's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64736 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104268 ___ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
[SlimDevices: Plugins] Using PC vs NAT for Server
Hi to All, A Qnap box was recently acquired and now Qnap, apparently, is not currently supporting Squeezebox. Most likely the Qnap will go back. I'm checking Synology's user forums for an alternate. The plan for the Qnap was to move the music library on to the LAN and stream with SBT. No interest in the Qnap's RAID capabilities. Perhaps a better product for the music project is a dedicated PC. Any comments appreciated especially about issues where the NAS would be superior. TIA Bill bill77056's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64736 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104268 ___ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
