Re: [political-research] Ratzinger, Pipes, Nazism and Zionism

2006-09-24 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis





As for Ratzinger's pretensions to being an intellectual and a 
devotee of reason -- what could be more absurd.  If Ratinzger truly 
respected reason, he would find it necessary as a matter of intellectual honesty 
to abandon all the superstitious mumbo jumbo and claptrap which has elevated him 
to his current position as a bogus authority on human and social affairs.  
I can't think of a single creative or useful insight that has come from the mind 
of Ratzinger.  Theology generally produces very little in the way of 
interesting knowledge.  Theology usually is a form of sterile 
wankery.  Smart people as a rule do not do theology -- they occupy their 
minds with more substantive matters.
 
 
VMANN:  david ray griffin does all right in 
theology, with reference to whiteheads process oriented worldview as well as to 
the political and "conspiratorial" realms.
vigilius haufniensis
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Intelligence
  
  
Social network
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [political-research] Ratzinger, Pipes, Nazism and Zionism

2006-09-24 Thread Sean McBride



David Ray Griffin was one of the foremost exceptions I had in mind when thinking about the depredations of theology. Theology can be occasionally interesting when it exhibits some kind of literary, poetic, imaginative or philosophical brilliance.  But folks with this kind of talent usually focus on writing literature, not theology, which tends to be a gaseous and bloated medium.  Theology is usually a weak form of imaginative literature which makes the preposterous claim of describing the real world -- in a word, wanking.  Ratzinger is a wanker par excellence -- try reading some of his sophistical babble for yourself.  He would be cut to shreds at any decent American university.  Why Europeans put up with him, I have not the slightest idea.  Apparently the neocons will have little trouble playing him like a cheap violin, since his Nazi instincts are so close to the surface of his personality.Vigilius
 Haufniensis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:As for Ratzinger's pretensions to being an intellectual and a devotee of reason -- what could be more absurd.  If Ratinzger truly respected reason, he would find it necessary as a matter of intellectual honesty to abandon all the superstitious mumbo jumbo and claptrap which has elevated him to his current position as a bogus authority on human and social affairs.  I can't think of a single creative or useful insight that has come from the mind of Ratzinger. 
 Theology generally produces very little in the way of interesting knowledge.  Theology usually is a form of sterile wankery.  Smart people as a rule do not do theology -- they occupy their minds with more substantive matters.        VMANN:  david ray griffin does all right in theology, with reference to whiteheads process oriented worldview as well as to the political and "conspiratorial" realms.  vigilius haufniensis  
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Intelligence
  
  
Social network
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___