Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Petr Vanek]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ihar Filipau  wrote:

>
> Hm. Why is the link to "documentfoundation.org"? It should be a FDO link.
>
> Try: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler


hmm, not sure what got me to documentfoundation.org through my search for this.
my bad. thank you
Petr
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Jason Crain]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:19:44AM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:33 PM, jose.ali...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
> > Please submit a bug in GNOME's bugzilla product:evince. Although I think
> > it's very unlikely to be implemented (not enough devs working on evince
> > atm)
>
> actually i did before and I will try again but debian bugtracker
> didn't like me today, see below or perhaps something went wrong on my
> side, Anyways, will retry :)

GNOME's bugzilla is at https://bugzilla.gnome.org.  For feature requests
like this I recommend submitting it to GNOME instead of Debian because
it's not something that can just be fixed in the Debian packaging.

And yes, Debian's bug tracker is tricky.  It's what happens when you
base a bug tracker completely on email.

> > from: Albert Astals Cid
> > What do you mean it doesn't allow you to enter any bug?
>
> I made an account today but there wasn't poppler category on
> bugs.freedesktop.org (there were other categories), i tried to
> force-feed it via
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler but
> it said "Sorry, either the product poppler does not exist or you
> aren't authorized to enter a bug into it. "

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/ is for LibreOffice.  There is a
poppler product listed on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/.
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Ihar Filipau]

On 2/24/17, Petr Vanek  wrote:
>> from: Albert Astals Cid
>> What do you mean it doesn't allow you to enter any bug?
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> I made an account today but there wasn't poppler category on
> bugs.freedesktop.org (there were other categories), i tried to
> force-feed it via
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler but
> it said "Sorry, either the product poppler does not exist or you
> aren't authorized to enter a bug into it. "
>

Hm. Why is the link to "documentfoundation.org"? It should be a FDO link.

Try: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[jose.ali...@gmail.com]

Hi again,


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Petr Vanek  wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:33 PM, jose.ali...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > Please submit a bug in GNOME's bugzilla product:evince. Although I think
> > it's very unlikely to be implemented (not enough devs working on
> evince
> > atm)
> >
> Hi José,
>
> actually i did before and I will try again but debian bugtracker
> didn't like me today, see below or perhaps something went wrong on my
> side, Anyways, will retry :)
>
> Your message didn't have a Package: line at the very first line of the
> mail body (part of the pseudo-header), or didn't have a Package: line
> at all. Unfortunatly, this means that your message has been ignored
> completely.
>
> Without this information we are unable to categorise or otherwise deal
> with your problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to
> sub...@bugs.debian.org and tell us which package the
> report is for. For help, check out
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.
>
reporting a bug in debian will get you nowhere. You should use
https://bugzilla.gnome.org



>
> > from: Albert Astals Cid
> > What do you mean it doesn't allow you to enter any bug?
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> I made an account today but there wasn't poppler category on
> bugs.freedesktop.org (there were other categories), i tried to
> force-feed it via
>

In bugs.freedesktop.org you need to use the Product:poppler


> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler but
> it said "Sorry, either the product poppler does not exist or you
> aren't authorized to enter a bug into it. "
>
This also will get you nowhere with poppler

Cheers,

José



>
>
> cheers
>
> Petr
>
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Petr Vanek]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:33 PM, jose.ali...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Please submit a bug in GNOME's bugzilla product:evince. Although I think
> it's very unlikely to be implemented (not enough devs working on evince
> atm)
>
Hi José,

actually i did before and I will try again but debian bugtracker
didn't like me today, see below or perhaps something went wrong on my
side, Anyways, will retry :)

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the very first line of the
mail body (part of the pseudo-header), or didn't have a Package: line
at all. Unfortunatly, this means that your message has been ignored
completely.

Without this information we are unable to categorise or otherwise deal
with your problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to
sub...@bugs.debian.org and tell us which package the
report is for. For help, check out
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.

> from: Albert Astals Cid
> What do you mean it doesn't allow you to enter any bug?

Hi Albert,

I made an account today but there wasn't poppler category on
bugs.freedesktop.org (there were other categories), i tried to
force-feed it via
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler but
it said "Sorry, either the product poppler does not exist or you
aren't authorized to enter a bug into it. "


cheers

Petr
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Albert Astals Cid]

El dijous, 23 de febrer de 2017, a les 14:56:32 CET, Petr Vanek va escriure:
> Hi all,
> 
> thank you for all your hard work.
> 
> This link to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler
> doesn't allow me in any way to report bug, hope doing it here wont be
> considered any violation.

What do you mean it doesn't allow you to enter any bug?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> I have been using Evince for many years and never reported this, instead i
> keep using acroread for some pdfs, which is just silly. I believe Evince
> uses poppler as pdf parser, hence my message here.
> 
> For whatever reason, Evince doesn't make links clickable in my own created
> documents, see example here: http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous/out.pdf - the
> numbers in circles have hyperlinks underneath (you can actually select them
> as a text with a mouse). The links are small and several  of them, to fill
> the circle. This was created many moons ago by writing an extension to some
> 3D modeling software and works perfectly in Acroread. Any idea why poppler
> ignores these links?
> 
> thank you
> 
> Petr


___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[jose.ali...@gmail.com]

Hi Petr,

Please submit a bug in GNOME's bugzilla product:evince. Although I think
it's very unlikely to be implemented (not enough devs working on evince
atm)

Kind regards

José


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Petr Vanek  wrote:

> Thank you Alexander.
>
> I do not have access to create this as a "real Annotation" as it is in a
> context of 3D modeling software. I did this probably about ten years ago
> and actoread simply worked ever since day one. When observing more and more
> people moving to Linux within business office deployment and with the
> constant explaining why they need acroread i realized that it would be nice
> not to depend on Adobe abandon-ware (linux client receives no more
> updates), so this pushed me to file a report.
>
> Any chance to do auto-link in poppler? What would be the harm? Is it
> against the specs? Would it be computationally expensive?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Alexander Grahn  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:56:32PM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote:
>> >For whatever reason, Evince doesn't make links clickable in my own
>> created
>> >documents, see example here: http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous/out.pdf - the
>> >numbers in circles have hyperlinks underneath (you can actually select
>> them
>> >as a text with a mouse). The links are small and several  of them, to
>> fill
>> >the circle. This was created many moons ago by writing an extension to
>> some
>> >3D modeling software and works perfectly in Acroread. Any idea why
>> poppler
>> >ignores these links?
>>
>> These are not real links (PDF Annotations with subtype /Link) but
>> ordinary text in the content stream of the page.
>>
>> Acroread has a built-in "auto-link" feature that creates links from text
>> that
>> looks like an URL.
>>
>
>
> ___
> poppler mailing list
> poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>
>
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] C++11 in poppler: adding override

[Adam Reichold]

Hello,

Am 22.02.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> El dimecres, 22 de febrer de 2017, a les 18:37:16 CET, Carlos Garcia Campos 
> va 
> escriure:
> What classes/methods we have that we know for sure final and should never be 
> overriden?

Marking something final could also be understood as "I do not think that
anyone overrides this one. Compiler, please go and check that for me."
instead of "This one should never, under any circumstances be
overriden.". In that case, the answer would be that everything with a
vtable should be final (in the internal code base at least) until
someone finds a need to override it.

This way, final will become a local hint to the global structure of the
code instead of the deliberate design choice to seal a type or method
implementation for good. I guess it is a question of style preferences
as to which interpretation is chosen.

Best regards, Adam.

P.S.:

> If noone disagrees strongly on March 8 i'll commit a patch adding override
> to the functions that override to make sure we don't forget something
> when changing one of the lots of virtual functions we have around.

I am not sure if it is worth the hassle, but since all of this is about
catching things at compile time and has little value at runtime, one
could create a define POPPLER_OVERRIDE that becomes empty on older
compilers not supporting C++11, so that this would not decrease compiler
coverage at all.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Petr Vanek]

Thank you Alexander.

I do not have access to create this as a "real Annotation" as it is in a
context of 3D modeling software. I did this probably about ten years ago
and actoread simply worked ever since day one. When observing more and more
people moving to Linux within business office deployment and with the
constant explaining why they need acroread i realized that it would be nice
not to depend on Adobe abandon-ware (linux client receives no more
updates), so this pushed me to file a report.

Any chance to do auto-link in poppler? What would be the harm? Is it
against the specs? Would it be computationally expensive?


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Alexander Grahn  wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:56:32PM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote:
> >For whatever reason, Evince doesn't make links clickable in my own created
> >documents, see example here: http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous/out.pdf - the
> >numbers in circles have hyperlinks underneath (you can actually select
> them
> >as a text with a mouse). The links are small and several  of them, to fill
> >the circle. This was created many moons ago by writing an extension to
> some
> >3D modeling software and works perfectly in Acroread. Any idea why poppler
> >ignores these links?
>
> These are not real links (PDF Annotations with subtype /Link) but
> ordinary text in the content stream of the page.
>
> Acroread has a built-in "auto-link" feature that creates links from text
> that
> looks like an URL.
>
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

Re: [poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Alexander Grahn]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:56:32PM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote:
>For whatever reason, Evince doesn't make links clickable in my own created
>documents, see example here: http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous/out.pdf - the
>numbers in circles have hyperlinks underneath (you can actually select them
>as a text with a mouse). The links are small and several  of them, to fill
>the circle. This was created many moons ago by writing an extension to some
>3D modeling software and works perfectly in Acroread. Any idea why poppler
>ignores these links?

These are not real links (PDF Annotations with subtype /Link) but
ordinary text in the content stream of the page.

Acroread has a built-in "auto-link" feature that creates links from text that
looks like an URL.
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler

[poppler] hyperlinks not clickable

[Petr Vanek]

Hi all,

thank you for all your hard work.

This link to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=poppler
doesn't allow me in any way to report bug, hope doing it here wont be
considered any violation.

I have been using Evince for many years and never reported this, instead i
keep using acroread for some pdfs, which is just silly. I believe Evince
uses poppler as pdf parser, hence my message here.

For whatever reason, Evince doesn't make links clickable in my own created
documents, see example here: http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous/out.pdf - the
numbers in circles have hyperlinks underneath (you can actually select them
as a text with a mouse). The links are small and several  of them, to fill
the circle. This was created many moons ago by writing an extension to some
3D modeling software and works perfectly in Acroread. Any idea why poppler
ignores these links?

thank you

Petr
___
poppler mailing list
poppler@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler