gnome-terminal / gnome-pty-helper cpu usage

2008-06-16 Thread Luca Corti

Hello,

Just after starting gnome-terminal cpu usage goes up to ~100%. The 
offending process is gnome-pty-helper, which quickly starts eating cpu 
time. This is always reproducible for me, and I've been experiencing this 
behaviour for quite some time (I think this applied to 4.1/4.2/4.3 gnome 
packages too).


I'm running -current amd64 with GENERIC.MP on a dual core Thinkpad T60 with 
the latest userland and gnome packages.


Is this a known bug? I am willing to test.

ciao

Luca



Re: gnome-terminal / gnome-pty-helper cpu usage

2008-06-16 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:29:51AM +0200, Luca Corti wrote:
 Hello,
hey!

 Just after starting gnome-terminal cpu usage goes up to ~100%. The 
 offending process is gnome-pty-helper, which quickly starts eating cpu 
 time. This is always reproducible for me, and I've been experiencing this 
 behaviour for quite some time (I think this applied to 4.1/4.2/4.3 gnome 
 packages too).

 I'm running -current amd64 with GENERIC.MP on a dual core Thinkpad T60 with 
 the latest userland and gnome packages.

 Is this a known bug? I am willing to test.
yep...this is a known bug for running gnome on amd64 :(

according to dlg who also spent some time on this issue, it's some
syscall going crazy. if you have the time to dig into this, please don't
hesitate and debug devel/vte (where gnome-pty-helper comes from),

 ciao

 Luca
cheers,
jasper


-- 
Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the
  texture of the situation at hand
-- Francisco Varela



Re: UPDATE: cln-1.2.2

2008-06-16 Thread Steven Mestdagh
Paul Irofti [2008-06-16, 01:34:57]:
 Attached is a patch for updating cln to the latest version. There were
 some fixes in the main tree for sparc64, if anyone cares to test this on
 that arch please do so and remember to uncomment the NOT_FOR_ARCHS line.
 
 Otherwise you can't update this package, you'll first have to remove the
 old one and then install the new one. Like Gaim used to do a while back
 if I remember correctly. Not sure if there's a fix for this, nor if a
 +DISPLAY file would be necessary. Please advise.
 
 Another change is my mail address, I'll have a few more updates for the
 ports I'm maintaining and I'll change my mail within the update. For the
 rest of the ports I'll send a common patch. Hope that's okay.

sure, we can change your address right away.
 
 Tested on i386. My amd64 is broken at the moment and until I'll have the
 time and the cash to fix the hardware it will remain that way. So
 please test.

tests passed on amd64 here. can't test sparc64 any time soon, maybe someone
else could?



Random Opera Freezes, still?

2008-06-16 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
Hey all,

I remember that a while back there were some issues with Opera randomly 
freezing. I believe that it could have been related to threads spawned 
or something of that sort. I am following -current and checked out the 
Opera 9.50 port. It seems to have the same issue of being very 
unstable and freezing. I am on an GENERIC.MP kernel. 

I also found some old stuff relating to Opera and Redhat 6.2 that 
mentioned a bug in glibc could be causing crashes in Opera on Linux. 
Could this be related at all?

Does anyone have suggestions for improving the stability of Opera? Can 
these suggestions be put into a document or something that is available 
to the user after installing Opera?

-- 
Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UPDATE: cln-1.2.2

2008-06-16 Thread Paul Irofti
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:37:55PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
 Paul Irofti [2008-06-16, 01:34:57]:
  Attached is a patch for updating cln to the latest version. There were
  some fixes in the main tree for sparc64, if anyone cares to test this on
  that arch please do so and remember to uncomment the NOT_FOR_ARCHS line.
  
  Otherwise you can't update this package, you'll first have to remove the
  old one and then install the new one. Like Gaim used to do a while back
  if I remember correctly. Not sure if there's a fix for this, nor if a
  +DISPLAY file would be necessary. Please advise.
  
  Another change is my mail address, I'll have a few more updates for the
  ports I'm maintaining and I'll change my mail within the update. For the
  rest of the ports I'll send a common patch. Hope that's okay.
 
 sure, we can change your address right away.
Thanks!

  
  Tested on i386. My amd64 is broken at the moment and until I'll have the
  time and the cash to fix the hardware it will remain that way. So
  please test.
 
 tests passed on amd64 here. can't test sparc64 any time soon, maybe someone
 else could?
 
amd64 checked! next sparc64... I'll ask on the IRC channel.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org



how to update to gnupg-1.4.9 ?

2008-06-16 Thread macintoshzoom
how to update to gnupg-1.4.9 ?
..
Can't remove gnupg-1.4.8 without also removing:
 sylpheed-2.4.5p0-gpgme gpgme-1.1.5 enigmail-0.95.5p0 kdewebdev-3.5.8p0
 p5-GnuPG-Interface-0.31p0 p5-GnuPG-0.09p0 kdeaddons-3.5.8p0
 kdesdk-3.5.8p0 kdepim-3.5.8p0 py-gnupg-0.3.2p1
...
Thanks



UPDATE: pgpdump

2008-06-16 Thread Gleydson Soares
0.20 - 0.26

- new HOMEPAGE address - modified MASTER_SITES
- modified patch/patch-configure
- fmt -w 72 pkg/DESCR
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/pgpdump/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 Makefile
--- Makefile15 Sep 2007 23:30:00 -  1.17
+++ Makefile16 Jun 2008 21:58:18 -
@@ -2,10 +2,10 @@
 
 COMMENT=   PGP packet visualizer
 
-DISTNAME=  pgpdump-0.20
-CATEGORIES=security
+DISTNAME=  pgpdump-0.26
+CATEGORIES=security
 
-HOMEPAGE=  http://pgp.iijlab.net/pgpdump.html
+HOMEPAGE=  http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/pgpdump/
 
 # BSD
 PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=  Yes
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP=  Yes
 WANTLIB=   c z
 
-MASTER_SITES=  ftp://pgp.iijlab.net/pub/pgp/tools/
+MASTER_SITES=  ${HOMEPAGE}
 
 CONFIGURE_STYLE=   gnu dest
 
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/pgpdump/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 distinfo
--- distinfo5 Apr 2007 17:26:09 -   1.7
+++ distinfo16 Jun 2008 21:58:39 -
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (pgpdump-0.20.tar.gz) = 7sL+ZqOC3UuMCBPjsxy5Kw==
-RMD160 (pgpdump-0.20.tar.gz) = m/gdGA04KEtipll2Mv4PjGAnWnk=
-SHA1 (pgpdump-0.20.tar.gz) = P+yertohowVbCfxvXmzNiHVZOc8=
-SHA256 (pgpdump-0.20.tar.gz) = eAFXtYziAg4bfvVdPIrnpGlCexN6rp1RO6CNdZdmU+Q=
-SIZE (pgpdump-0.20.tar.gz) = 52292
+MD5 (pgpdump-0.26.tar.gz) = pr7vDJTgU9lacKzEo55cSA==
+RMD160 (pgpdump-0.26.tar.gz) = o75jx6fHJG6UlU6UX3OruZkR51o=
+SHA1 (pgpdump-0.26.tar.gz) = N83OtqcikZ9zCB+g02TEfGowxl8=
+SHA256 (pgpdump-0.26.tar.gz) = a5TIZHzDFrZMarLiaCe/NTCooKHoCHambOvtTivpiV4=
+SIZE (pgpdump-0.26.tar.gz) = 55341
Index: patches/patch-Makefile_in
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/pgpdump/patches/patch-Makefile_in,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 patch-Makefile_in
--- patches/patch-Makefile_in   2 Nov 2003 02:28:25 -   1.4
+++ patches/patch-Makefile_in   16 Jun 2008 21:58:59 -
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 $OpenBSD: patch-Makefile_in,v 1.4 2003/11/02 02:28:25 margarida Exp $
 Makefile.in.orig   2002-06-27 08:28:34.0 +0200
-+++ Makefile.in2003-08-13 14:40:52.0 +0200
-@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ bindir = @bindir@
+--- Makefile.in.orig   Mon Jun 16 18:46:07 2008
 Makefile.inMon Jun 16 18:47:13 2008
+@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@
+ bindir = @bindir@
  mandir = @mandir@/man1
  LIBS = @LIBS@
- 
--CFLAGS = -O
+-CFLAGS  = @CFLAGS@ -O
++CFLAGS  = @CFLAGS@
+ LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
 +DESTDIR=
-+
-+CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@
+ 
  RM = rm -f
  INSTALL  = install -c -m
- 
Index: pkg/DESCR
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/pgpdump/pkg/DESCR,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 DESCR
--- pkg/DESCR   2 Nov 2003 02:28:25 -   1.3
+++ pkg/DESCR   16 Jun 2008 21:59:13 -
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer which displays the packet 
-format of OpenPGP (RFC 2440 + bis) and PGP version 2 (RFC 1991).
+pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer which displays the packet format of
+OpenPGP (RFC 2440 + bis) and PGP version 2 (RFC 1991).


Re: how to update to gnupg-1.4.9 ?

2008-06-16 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 02:43:50PM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote:
 how to update to gnupg-1.4.9 ?
 ..
 Can't remove gnupg-1.4.8 without also removing:
  sylpheed-2.4.5p0-gpgme gpgme-1.1.5 enigmail-0.95.5p0 kdewebdev-3.5.8p0
  p5-GnuPG-Interface-0.31p0 p5-GnuPG-0.09p0 kdeaddons-3.5.8p0
  kdesdk-3.5.8p0 kdepim-3.5.8p0 py-gnupg-0.3.2p1

  check pkg_add(1)

  f.-



Re: UPDATE: cln-1.2.2

2008-06-16 Thread Mike Erdely
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:37:55PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
 Paul Irofti [2008-06-16, 01:34:57]:
  Tested on i386. My amd64 is broken at the moment and until I'll have the
  time and the cash to fix the hardware it will remain that way. So
  please test.
 
 tests passed on amd64 here. can't test sparc64 any time soon, maybe someone
 else could?

I've been building on alpha and sparc64 for a few hours now...  Still 
building...
I'll write back when done.

Builds and passes regression tests on macppc.

-ME



Re: Random Opera Freezes, still?

2008-06-16 Thread Antti Harri

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:


Hey all,

I remember that a while back there were some issues with Opera randomly
freezing. I believe that it could have been related to threads spawned
or something of that sort. I am following -current and checked out the
Opera 9.50 port. It seems to have the same issue of being very
unstable and freezing. I am on an GENERIC.MP kernel.

I also found some old stuff relating to Opera and Redhat 6.2 that
mentioned a bug in glibc could be causing crashes in Opera on Linux.
Could this be related at all?

Does anyone have suggestions for improving the stability of Opera? Can
these suggestions be put into a document or something that is available
to the user after installing Opera?


I'm experiencing a lot of freezes too. With 9.2x it only freezed very
occasionally and pkill opera did the job. With 9.50p0 I need to kill
it with SIGKILL.

OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #907: Mon Jun  9 09:04:30 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC

opera-9.50p0fast and customizable WWW browser
(no flash plugin)

--
Antti Harri



Re: UPDATE: cln-1.2.2

2008-06-16 Thread Mike Erdely
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:01:11PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:37:55PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
  tests passed on amd64 here. can't test sparc64 any time soon, maybe someone
  else could?
 
 I've been building on alpha and sparc64 for a few hours now...  Still 
 building...
 I'll write back when done.

Sparc64 fails regression tests.  I did not look into it at all.
Log: http://erdelynet.com/downloads/cln_regress_sparc64.log

Alpha is... still... building...

-ME



gnu ghostscript port bug

2008-06-16 Thread Dongsheng Song
# cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu
# make install
...
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
*** Error code 77

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu (line 2114 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu (line 1417 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu (line 1937 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
# echo $CFLAGS

When I set CFLAGS for make, all is OK:

# CFLAGS=-I/usr/include make install

Dongsheng Song