Re: Update preview: net/kismet
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 08:26:24AM +0200, Dawe wrote: > > This updates kismet to a completely new version (formerly known as > > `kismet-newcore'). Note that I only left one source type, `radiotap_bsd', > > and that it should work with just specifying the interface to a > > wireless capturing source. Available channels should be detected > > automatically. > > > > Please give it a try. > > Works for me on i386 with an ural device. > Unfortunately I don't have any gps hardware. If all else fails (and if the wether permits), I'll test gps functionality myself tomorrow when i'm back home. To all other testers: please also check wether the battery display works correctly; there have been some bugs in the past, iirc. Ciao, Kili
UPDATE: www/py-nevow
update to py-nevow 0.9.33
ok?
Eric.
diff -urN py-nevow.orig/Makefile py-nevow/Makefile
--- py-nevow.orig/Makefile Wed Mar 25 14:52:31 2009
+++ py-nevow/Makefile Fri Oct 16 10:22:44 2009
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
COMMENT= web application construction kit
-VERSION= 0.9.32
+VERSION= 0.9.33
DISTNAME= Nevow-${VERSION}
-PKGNAME= py-nevow-${VERSION}p0
+PKGNAME= py-nevow-${VERSION}
CATEGORIES=www
HOMEPAGE= http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/DivmodNevow
@@ -21,17 +21,23 @@
MODULES= lang/python
-BUILD_DEPENDS= :py-twisted-web-*:devel/py-twisted/web
-RUN_DEPENDS= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} \
+RUN_DEPENDS= :py-twisted-web-*:devel/py-twisted/web \
:py-epsilon-*:devel/py-epsilon
+BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} \
+ :py-twisted-lore-*:devel/py-twisted/lore
+
MODPY_EGG_VERSION= ${VERSION}
+MODPY_DISTUTILS_INSTALLARGS= --install-data=/usr/local/share/doc
+pre-configure:
+ cd ${WRKSRC}/doc/howto && lore -p *.xhtml */*.xhtml
+ mv ${WRKSRC}/doc/howto ${WRKSRC}/py-nevow
+
post-install:
+ ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/man/nevow-xmlgettext.1 ${PREFIX}/man/man1
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/examples/py-nevow
cp -r ${WRKSRC}/examples/* ${PREFIX}/share/examples/py-nevow
- ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/py-nevow
- cp -r ${WRKSRC}/doc/txt/* ${PREFIX}/share/doc/py-nevow
TRIALDIR= ${WRKDIR}/trial
do-regress: install
diff -urN py-nevow.orig/distinfo py-nevow/distinfo
--- py-nevow.orig/distinfo Mon Sep 1 21:11:04 2008
+++ py-nevow/distinfo Fri Oct 16 08:25:11 2009
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (Nevow-0.9.32.tar.gz) = XvkJ6kn+R0EMZxza8fSANA==
-RMD160 (Nevow-0.9.32.tar.gz) = WCwTQUAHCNO1pHGY2q+klMGVAa0=
-SHA1 (Nevow-0.9.32.tar.gz) = NFSY41atC3mcEPhBTI8k27v8NA8=
-SHA256 (Nevow-0.9.32.tar.gz) = zQTjc3c3yeijYdF4CfUJj+ImclQiaj9qqWeF3qgYCCY=
-SIZE (Nevow-0.9.32.tar.gz) = 540712
+MD5 (Nevow-0.9.33.tar.gz) = a8V5eATIzvp/RqKFHpsnbA==
+RMD160 (Nevow-0.9.33.tar.gz) = gjmwOGXeceAZF2l935BdE2LZW7Y=
+SHA1 (Nevow-0.9.33.tar.gz) = i8gi5Ss1OtPVhRTtPzmu7b5gsWQ=
+SHA256 (Nevow-0.9.33.tar.gz) = usTsF5YZi8OYTQx61mLEt9QkYCoQQTSwkBHLm2m7Kc4=
+SIZE (Nevow-0.9.33.tar.gz) = 554704
diff -urN py-nevow.orig/patches/patch-setup_py py-nevow/patches/patch-setup_py
--- py-nevow.orig/patches/patch-setup_pyThu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+++ py-nevow/patches/patch-setup_py Fri Oct 16 09:00:47 2009
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+--- setup.py.orig Fri Mar 13 18:59:06 2009
setup.py Fri Oct 16 09:00:39 2009
+@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ except ImportError:
+
+ import os
+ docs=[]
+-for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in os.walk("doc"):
++for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in os.walk("py-nevow"):
+ if ".svn" in dirnames:
+ del dirnames[dirnames.index(".svn")]
+ thesedocs = []
diff -urN py-nevow.orig/pkg/PLIST py-nevow/pkg/PLIST
--- py-nevow.orig/pkg/PLIST Mon Sep 1 21:11:04 2008
+++ py-nevow/pkg/PLIST Fri Oct 16 09:09:55 2009
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
@comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.3 2008/09/01 19:11:04 eric Exp $
bin/nevow-xmlgettext
bin/nit
-lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/PKG-INFO
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/Nevow-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/top_level.txt
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/formless/
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/formless/__init__.py
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/formless/__init__.pyc
@@ -26,6 +30,7 @@
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/formless/webform.py
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/formless/webform.pyc
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/Canvas.fla
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/Canvas.swf
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/__init__.py
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/__init__.pyc
@@ -45,6 +50,7 @@
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/athena_private/connection-status-down.png
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/blocks.py
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/blocks.pyc
+lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/canvas.as
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/canvas.py
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/canvas.pyc
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/compression.py
@@ -119,6 +125,8 @@
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/js/Nevow/TagLibrary/__init__.js
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/nevow/js/Nevow/Test/
lib/python${MODPY_VE
update: www/drupal/print-6.x-1.10
This fixes DRUPAL-SA-CONTRIB-2009-073 (6.x-1.9) as well as a bug
introduced with this fix.
I'm currently not able to test this no-brainer, so feedback of those who
can is welcomed.
Cheers,
Stephan
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/drupal6/printer-friendly/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 Makefile
--- Makefile3 Sep 2009 13:20:04 - 1.3
+++ Makefile16 Oct 2009 09:49:23 -
@@ -2,8 +2,9 @@
COMMENT = printer-friendly pages in drupal
-DISTNAME = print-6.x-1.8
-PKGNAME = drupal6-printer-friendly-1.8
+V =1.10
+DISTNAME = print-6.x-${V}
+PKGNAME = drupal6-printer-friendly-${V}
#DISTFILES = ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
# dompdf-0.5.1${EXTRACT_SUFX}:0
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/drupal6/printer-friendly/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 distinfo
--- distinfo3 Sep 2009 13:20:04 - 1.3
+++ distinfo16 Oct 2009 09:49:23 -
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.8.tar.gz) = slP+9TQqpC7c2eTd9kdePA==
-RMD160 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.8.tar.gz) = 4oqaNB3kbLY+n+7yoKSLSHc3ZmA=
-SHA1 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.8.tar.gz) = z9H5FsOYkkMgr07ZFL95nQ9kXpA=
-SHA256 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.8.tar.gz) =
2VFP400R5z5KD98kTQz6mXgePCXAyVndnY46+pspb4M=
-SIZE (drupal6/print-6.x-1.8.tar.gz) = 159471
+MD5 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.10.tar.gz) = k+8rhR3yy0cIL9YFownN6w==
+RMD160 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.10.tar.gz) = 3r+s645NCNkYTwjHK/6LB+GyGVs=
+SHA1 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.10.tar.gz) = x+oohHlJKrq3jGGwC1BKkr+q8tw=
+SHA256 (drupal6/print-6.x-1.10.tar.gz) =
dPClSthVGdkZImxEISpJ9Wck295pbO6g1U8FOcP/1rg=
+SIZE (drupal6/print-6.x-1.10.tar.gz) = 163040
UPDATE: audio/pms
Hi,
This updates the pms mpd client to 0.41.
Tested i386.
OK to commit?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett
diff -urNa -x CVS /usr/ports/audio/pms/Makefile pms/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/audio/pms/Makefile Sun May 31 03:51:02 2009
+++ pms/MakefileFri Oct 16 11:44:22 2009
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= curses based frontend for mpd
-DISTNAME= pms-0.40.6
+DISTNAME= pms-0.41
EXTRACT_SUFX = .tar.bz2
CATEGORIES=audio
diff -urNa -x CVS /usr/ports/audio/pms/distinfo pms/distinfo
--- /usr/ports/audio/pms/distinfo Sun May 31 03:51:02 2009
+++ pms/distinfoFri Oct 16 11:45:00 2009
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (pms-0.40.6.tar.bz2) = ez5Ss1jZgWxvbVq4eyasYg==
-RMD160 (pms-0.40.6.tar.bz2) = GPoA07s5jZdfcVL/DvZkFDFjTbs=
-SHA1 (pms-0.40.6.tar.bz2) = z9+BoYNTf3YhA1E1iY1c/x0qTG8=
-SHA256 (pms-0.40.6.tar.bz2) = ERhtRmJe14ggyJvM2ob58GZDG0/+7qptXnM01xZebZU=
-SIZE (pms-0.40.6.tar.bz2) = 170418
+MD5 (pms-0.41.tar.bz2) = bWcF82/OiYpOVRFJ73NGQQ==
+RMD160 (pms-0.41.tar.bz2) = H5WUdguGLtN/ZepmijjIXeQtH74=
+SHA1 (pms-0.41.tar.bz2) = s1MxSoEOFtwaCeD8gCuesCUDLNY=
+SHA256 (pms-0.41.tar.bz2) = j933+1PDPLwXU6hjgVia6YPY4KIdpo5UL5L3dxOQc60=
+SIZE (pms-0.41.tar.bz2) = 182193
diff -urNa -x CVS /usr/ports/audio/pms/patches/patch-src_config_cpp
pms/patches/patch-src_config_cpp
--- /usr/ports/audio/pms/patches/patch-src_config_cpp Sun May 31 03:51:02 2009
+++ pms/patches/patch-src_config_cppFri Oct 16 12:36:44 2009
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
$OpenBSD: patch-src_config_cpp,v 1.1.1.1 2009/05/31 02:51:02 landry Exp $
don't bail out when the default configuration file is not found,
defaults just works fine.
src/config.cpp.origSat May 30 18:30:57 2009
-+++ src/config.cpp Sat May 30 18:54:58 2009
-@@ -387,6 +387,8 @@ bool Configurator::source(string fn,
Error & err)
+--- src/config.cpp.origSun Aug 23 09:47:51 2009
src/config.cpp Fri Oct 16 11:45:38 2009
+@@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ bool Configurator::source(string fn,
Error & err)
if (fd == NULL)
{
+ if (fn.substr(fn.length() - 7,7) == ".pms/rc")
+ return true;
err.code = CERR_NO_FILE;
- err.str = "Could not open file.";
+ err.str = fn + ": could not open file.";
return false;
diff -urNa -x CVS /usr/ports/audio/pms/patches/patch-src_pms_cpp
pms/patches/patch-src_pms_cpp
--- /usr/ports/audio/pms/patches/patch-src_pms_cpp Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+++ pms/patches/patch-src_pms_cpp Fri Oct 16 12:36:44 2009
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+--- src/pms.cpp.orig Fri Oct 16 12:36:18 2009
src/pms.cppFri Oct 16 12:36:33 2009
+@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
+ */
+
+ #include "pms.h"
++#include
+
+ using namespace std;
+
GNOME 2.28
Hi. "It compiles, let's shipt it!". So, Jasper and I worked quite a lot at p2k9 to bring GNOME up to the latest version, i.e. 2.28.0. So far most of it works just fine, but we have aware of the following regressions so far: * shutdown/reboot won't work from the gnome panel (either I need to backport the gigantic differences from my former patch to the new version or we make policykit works -- what is in tree kind of work but is way too old) * at-spi-registryd and gnome-keyring-daemon core dumps on first start (there are respawned just fine so it is not so much of an issue, but still, we need to find out why) * some sound related applets/helpers are not provided anymore because our gstreamer version is frmo middle-age ; there are alternatives though * gnome-scan is broken ; upstream does not seem very active anymore There is still an issue with the sticky notes applet which we are looking into. Anyone wanting to see more details can refer to the commits logs. We would appreciate any OpenBSD GNOME user to report to Jasper and I any issue and/or regression one is seeing, but please make sure it is related to OpenBSD and not a GNOME generic issue. We take this opportunity to thank everyone that helped making p2k9 possible, it would have been *impossible* to put that much work in such a short time otherwise... Just so you know, Jasper and I will keep working and intensively testing this new version and we expect to have a fully debugged and fixed GNOME 2.28 within 3 to 4 weeks. Cheers! -- Antoine & Jasper
version of source file to diff against, when submitting a patch
[ Apologies if this is a duplicate posting: I'm having a couple of issues
with my gateway ]
Just fixed an issue in a port, and am preparing a patch to send to the
maintainer.
The relevant source file is already the subject of an existing patch in the
port distribution.
I'm a bit uncertain how to create my patch, in order to be maximally helpful
to the maintainer.
Options:
(a) diff {final version of source} versus {original unpatched version of
source}
(b) diff {final version of source} versus {source plus existing patch}
... or should I send an amended version of the existing patch, to also
include my changes?
I assume that diff -rupN is the preferred format - correct?
Anything else I should bear in mind? (I'm aready working from the HEAD
version on CVS)
Kind regards, MARTIN
version of source file to diff against, when submitting a patch
Just fixed an issue in a port, and am preparing a patch to send to the
maintainer.
The relevant source file is already the subject of an existing patch in the
port distribution.
I'm a bit uncertain how to create my patch, in order to be maximally helpful
to the maintainer.
Options:
(a) diff {final version of source} versus {original unpatched version of
source}
(b) diff {final version of source} versus {source plus existing patch}
... or should I send an amended version of the existing patch, to also
include my changes?
I assume that diff -rupN is the preferred format - correct?
Anything else I should bear in mind? (I'm aready working from the HEAD
version on CVS)
Kind regards, MARTIN
Aprenda inglês a partir!
a melhor instituição mundial de ensino Aprenda inglês a partir de sua casa com o curso NEW BBC ENGLISHMultimedia System método desenvolvido pela 60 milhões de alunos em 17 países 77 anos de experiência 87% de eficácia nos exames da Universidade de Cambridge Aproveite ascondições especiais de financiamento! INSCREVA-SE JÁ! NOTA INFORMATIVA: O presente email destina-se única e exclusivamente a informar potenciais utilizadores e não pode ser considerado SPAM. De acordo com a legislação internacional que regulamenta o correio electrónico, "o email não pode será ser considerado SPAM quando incluir uma forma do receptor ser removido da lista do emissor". Se pretender não receber mais estes emails clique AQUI.
Re: version of source file to diff against, when submitting a patch
Use "make update-patches" to create the port patches (that go under patches/) and use cvs diff -u to create the diff file the maintainer can use to patch his version to match yours. You may want to add more switches, but at least unified diff is preferred. -- Antti Harri
Re: Thank you for making p2k9 possible!
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 03:36:58AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote: > Its been a great hackathon and I'd like to thank both robert and theo > for creating this opportunity for all of us to meet and work together. > Also thanks to everybody that keeps donating and buying CDs which make > such things possible. Yet again thank you for a great time here in > Budapest. Cheers! Add my word to this... p2k9 was as awesome and productive like the previous hackathons ! Lots of cleanups, updates & QA was done, and quite a good amount of new ports were added... Thanks again to robert for hosting us!
Re: Update preview: net/kismet
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > If all else fails (and if the wether permits), I'll test gps > functionality myself tomorrow when i'm back home. > > To all other testers: please also check wether the battery display > works correctly; there have been some bugs in the past, iirc. > > Ciao, > Kili > > Works for me on amd64 with a run(4) device. gps picks up the current location. It is attached to a desktop, so no idea if it will update if it moves. dan
Re: Thank you for making p2k9 possible!
Sounds interesting. Can we wait on resulting materials? On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > Hello > > p2k9 (the ports hackathon in Budapest) is on since Friday. People > are working on different things like GNOME, GCC4, BluRay support or > even ACPI. > > I would like to thank everyone who donated money to the project because > the individual donors made it possible to organize this event. > So ... BIG THANKS GOES TO OUR USERS, to people supporting the project > even at these times. > > I'd also like to thank NIIF and Sun Microsystems Hungary for lending > us a nice hackroom and hardware for the hackathon. > >
Re: version of source file to diff against, when submitting a patch
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 02:12:21PM +0100, Junk wrote: > Just fixed an issue in a port, and am preparing a patch to send to the > maintainer. You send a diff against the *port*. > The relevant source file is already the subject of an existing patch in the > port distribution. > > I'm a bit uncertain how to create my patch, in order to be maximally > helpful to the maintainer. See bsd.port.mk(5), target `update-patches'. Ciao, Kili
Re: Thank you for making p2k9 possible!
You can see whats been happening if you are subscribed to the cvs src changes list. Offhand at least 30 new ports were added, more than 250 were updated, lots were tweaked, and the pkg_add code was worked on. Likely I missed a lot, too--I was mostly focused on the ports changes so more stuff was done than I saw. When you want to find out whats happened (happening) at a hackathon, watching the commits is the best way to see whats going on. --STeve Andre' On Friday 16 October 2009 17:37:18 Nick Rivera wrote: > Sounds interesting. > Can we wait on resulting materials? > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > > > Hello > > > > p2k9 (the ports hackathon in Budapest) is on since Friday. People > > are working on different things like GNOME, GCC4, BluRay support or > > even ACPI. > > > > I would like to thank everyone who donated money to the project because > > the individual donors made it possible to organize this event. > > So ... BIG THANKS GOES TO OUR USERS, to people supporting the project > > even at these times. > > > > I'd also like to thank NIIF and Sun Microsystems Hungary for lending > > us a nice hackroom and hardware for the hackathon.
