CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2010/01/14 10:23:28 Modified files: infrastructure/db: systrace.filter Log message: Permit native-mincore, at least some GNU m4 programs and clisp hit this. ok sturm@ ajacoutot@
Re: Update for pjsua
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:34:34AM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: Arg, forgot to attach the patch. Sorry. It's getting late. a few months ago I ported the newest pjsua. Today my changes got included in the upstream svn repository. A patch against the current pjsua port is attached. I put the distfile on my own server. It has only 400 kb/s upstream, so I can not host the distfile on my server. Maybe it can be put on the OpenBSD server? The distfile is just the svn checkout with the portaudio library stripped from it, because the port uses the portaudio included with OpenBSD. I know deanna@ is more or less MIA, but did you sent her this first ? I did not get cvs to produce a proper diff that includes the deleted files. So sorry for the inconvenience with this broken diff. Suggestions on how to get a proper diff showing the deleted files are very welcome. rm patches/patch-foo cvs delete patches/patch-foo Landry
Re: Update for pjsua
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:40:12 +0100 Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:34:34AM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: Arg, forgot to attach the patch. Sorry. It's getting late. a few months ago I ported the newest pjsua. Today my changes got included in the upstream svn repository. A patch against the current pjsua port is attached. I put the distfile on my own server. It has only 400 kb/s upstream, so I can not host the distfile on my server. Maybe it can be put on the OpenBSD server? The distfile is just the svn checkout with the portaudio library stripped from it, because the port uses the portaudio included with OpenBSD. I know deanna@ is more or less MIA, but did you sent her this first ? Yes, someday in november of last year. No reply. I did not get cvs to produce a proper diff that includes the deleted files. So sorry for the inconvenience with this broken diff. Suggestions on how to get a proper diff showing the deleted files are very welcome. rm patches/patch-foo cvs delete patches/patch-foo Landry signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: ports softlock
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:04:37AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote: So none of the Tcl stuff from the past couple of months is going in? The approval group noted above doesn't give me the impression of being too excited about Tcl. Lack of time from my part as well. I have noticed your work, but as you can see, I have done about nothing in the ports tree proper over the past release, I've spent most of my time working on pkg_add instead. The current goal is to stabilize things and have a release. The sooner it's done, the better to start a new cycle, and for the Tcl stuff to go in. ;-) Any of p5-Catalyst-* updated to latest version? I'm working (and testing) on p5-Catalyst-Runtime 5.80018, p5-Catalyst-Devel etc... It will be great to find them into 4.7 -rel Any comments? (jim@ / simon@ ?) Saluti, Cesare.
Re: ports softlock
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Cesare Gargano wrote: Any of p5-Catalyst-* updated to latest version? I'm working (and testing) on p5-Catalyst-Runtime 5.80018, p5-Catalyst-Devel etc... It will be great to find them into 4.7 -rel Any comments? (jim@ / simon@ ?) Saluti, Cesare. Unless there's a showstopper in what currently is in-tree, don't expect miracles. I know, Catalyst is simple, nothing will break... well, multiply that by 7000 ports, and you have a size problem.
license for emulators/frodo?
from ${PREFIX}/share/doc/frodo/legalmush.html
The program Frodo, this manual and the source code may be freely
distributed as long as they remain unchanged (archiving and packing is
allowed) and all files are included. You must not make any profit by
selling Frodo, especially the price of a disk containing Frodo may not
exceed US$ 5,- (or equivalent amounts in other currencied). Please feel
free to distribute Frodo via bulletin board systems and networks and as
part of shareware/freeware CD-ROMS.
and again later
You are not allowed to use the source to create and distribute a
modified version of Frodo.
and this is in the Makfile for the port:
# FreeWare
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= Yes
the package is modified, and the cdroms are more than $5.
there's also an unlicensed file at ports/emulators/frodo/file/SID_openbsd.i.
PS what is the license on ports/audio/tracker/files/test.uu ?
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Re: license for emulators/frodo?
Yeah that better come out of the CDROM.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:49:53PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
from ${PREFIX}/share/doc/frodo/legalmush.html
The program Frodo, this manual and the source code may be freely
distributed as long as they remain unchanged (archiving and packing is
allowed) and all files are included. You must not make any profit by
selling Frodo, especially the price of a disk containing Frodo may not
exceed US$ 5,- (or equivalent amounts in other currencied). Please feel
free to distribute Frodo via bulletin board systems and networks and as
part of shareware/freeware CD-ROMS.
and again later
You are not allowed to use the source to create and distribute a
modified version of Frodo.
and this is in the Makfile for the port:
# FreeWare
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= Yes
the package is modified, and the cdroms are more than $5.
there's also an unlicensed file at ports/emulators/frodo/file/SID_openbsd.i.
PS what is the license on ports/audio/tracker/files/test.uu ?
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Re: license for emulators/frodo?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:06:48PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:49:53PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
from ${PREFIX}/share/doc/frodo/legalmush.html
The program Frodo, this manual and the source code may be freely
distributed as long as they remain unchanged (archiving and packing is
allowed) and all files are included. You must not make any profit by
selling Frodo, especially the price of a disk containing Frodo may not
exceed US$ 5,- (or equivalent amounts in other currencied). Please feel
free to distribute Frodo via bulletin board systems and networks and as
part of shareware/freeware CD-ROMS.
and again later
You are not allowed to use the source to create and distribute a
modified version of Frodo.
I'll have to dig out, I'm pretty certain I asked the author if he still cared
about it, I should have the email somewhere.
then he should change the license ...
and this is in the Makfile for the port:
# FreeWare
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes
PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= Yes
the package is modified, and the cdroms are more than $5.
there's also an unlicensed file at ports/emulators/frodo/file/SID_openbsd.i.
The SID_openbsd.i file is mine, obviously. It's not enough independent work
to warrant a licence, since it's just a small change from the sun version.
PS what is the license on ports/audio/tracker/files/test.uu ?
Doesn't actually matter for the package, since it's a test file, which is not
included anywhere. I have the CDs it's excerpted from, and it's also freely
available if you look around on the web...
I look in ports, where that file is distributed, and see no license
notification of any sort.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
ports/games/quake/files/snd_openbsd.c
GPL? was this missing from the quake distribution, or why does it have a copyright notice that it's from Id Software? -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
update: fossil-20100112141013
New fossil-20100112141013 update. Tested on amd64.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/fossil/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 Makefile
--- Makefile19 Dec 2009 00:23:33 - 1.6
+++ Makefile14 Jan 2010 23:56:51 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT = simple distributed software configuration management
-VERSION = 20091218002951
+VERSION = 20100112141013
DISTNAME = fossil-src-${VERSION}
PKGNAME = fossil-${VERSION}
CATEGORIES = devel www
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/fossil/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 distinfo
--- distinfo19 Dec 2009 00:23:33 - 1.4
+++ distinfo14 Jan 2010 23:56:51 -
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-MD5 (fossil-src-20091218002951.tar.gz) = 68dfspC8moVJvj28pkmWkg==
-RMD160 (fossil-src-20091218002951.tar.gz) = 82TNdk88VAOSqoBDNswbFKNjdVM=
-SHA1 (fossil-src-20091218002951.tar.gz) = dVgQFat1h/PZn4EblF+VJHpkUjs=
-SHA256 (fossil-src-20091218002951.tar.gz) =
bhdr7SED54mBwBr2gXS9AUN6Gzc8nVjEgMnfHqtW6aM=
-SIZE (fossil-src-20091218002951.tar.gz) = 1816585
+MD5 (fossil-src-20100112141013.tar.gz) = iAwd5+hXT3PGgEYEmqOsLg==
+RMD160 (fossil-src-20100112141013.tar.gz) = 3ZMx5rgWCLPsypFDhSas/MgmObg=
+SHA1 (fossil-src-20100112141013.tar.gz) = FOtzG92RM6SermD5qlwvTGhuYkw=
+SHA256 (fossil-src-20100112141013.tar.gz) =
x9bAtaB47WFxHxsByltpom30hxdLSAGCR/oPMw0fCzA=
+SIZE (fossil-src-20100112141013.tar.gz) = 1839077
Re: Problem building devel/p5-Test-Exception
On 2010/01/14 18:04, STeve Andre' wrote: This is on an i386-current machine compiled on Jan 13th, latest package src from obsd.cec.mtu.edu. What do you see if you update and install src/usr.sbin/pkg_add, then try again? During a bulk build this did not work; trying by hand got this vista /usr/ports/devel/p5-Test-Exception make clean ; make package === Cleaning for p5-Test-Exception-0.27 === Checking files for p5-Test-Exception-0.27 `/usr/ports/distfiles/Test-Exception-0.27.tar.gz' is up to date. (SHA256) Test-Exception-0.27.tar.gz: OK === p5-Test-Exception-0.27 depends on: p5-Sub-Uplevel-* - not found === Verifying install for p5-Sub-Uplevel-* in devel/p5-Sub-Uplevel `/usr/ports/bulk/i386/p5-Sub-Uplevel-0.22v0' is up to date. === Installing p5-Sub-Uplevel-0.22v0 from /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/ Collision: the following files already exist Can't call method value without a package or object reference at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/CollisionReport.pm line 32. *** Error code 22 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Sub-Uplevel (line 1478 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Sub-Uplevel (line 1968 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). *** Error code 1 --STeve Andre'
emulators/uae flavors
is there any reason to not enable SDL sound always and get rid of the flavor? reading the commit messages leads me to believe sound doesn't work in the non-flavored package. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
